Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

What to Expect From the New ASCO/CAP Guideline Recommendations for Hormone Receptor Testing in Breast Cancer: A National Reference Laboratory Experience

What to Expect From the New ASCO/CAP Guideline Recommendations for Hormone Receptor Testing in... The new ASCO/CAP guidelines on hormone receptor testing in breast cancer recommends standard operating procedures (SOPs) established to confirm or adjudicate estrogen receptor (ER) results with weak or ≤10% staining, and the status of internal controls (ICs) reported for cases with 0% to 10% staining. The aim of this study is to determine the frequency of ER testing with weak or ≤10% staining that may require additional steps following SOPs and to identify any correlation between hormone receptor status of the tumor and the likelihood of finding IC. Breast cancer cases between January 2014 and April 2019 were included to identify negative, low-positive and weak-positive cases. The presence/absence of IC was correlated to tumor type. Following ASCO/CAP guidelines, 29.8% of cases (374/1261) will need additional steps to confirm/adjudicate results due to negative, low, or weak positive ER status. The probability of finding IC is ~50% lower in cases of ER and progesterone receptor (PgR) negative tumors. Repeat testing may be warranted in 13.1% (92/700) of all cases due to lack of IC. In conclusion, the new ASCO/CAP guidelines recommend laboratories to establish and follow SOP to confirm or adjudicate ER results for about 30% of the cases before reporting hormone receptors status. Over 40% of cases with <10% tumor ER positivity lacked IC that may need a comment per the guidelines indicating a repeat testing may be warranted. However, the presence/absence of IC may be related to the subtype of breast cancer and should not necessarily bring into question the validity of the test. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology Wolters Kluwer Health

What to Expect From the New ASCO/CAP Guideline Recommendations for Hormone Receptor Testing in Breast Cancer: A National Reference Laboratory Experience

Download PDF
6 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wolters-kluwer-health/what-to-expect-from-the-new-asco-cap-guideline-recommendations-for-anVho61t7n

References (26)

Publisher
Wolters Kluwer Health
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1541-2016
DOI
10.1097/PAI.0000000000000891
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The new ASCO/CAP guidelines on hormone receptor testing in breast cancer recommends standard operating procedures (SOPs) established to confirm or adjudicate estrogen receptor (ER) results with weak or ≤10% staining, and the status of internal controls (ICs) reported for cases with 0% to 10% staining. The aim of this study is to determine the frequency of ER testing with weak or ≤10% staining that may require additional steps following SOPs and to identify any correlation between hormone receptor status of the tumor and the likelihood of finding IC. Breast cancer cases between January 2014 and April 2019 were included to identify negative, low-positive and weak-positive cases. The presence/absence of IC was correlated to tumor type. Following ASCO/CAP guidelines, 29.8% of cases (374/1261) will need additional steps to confirm/adjudicate results due to negative, low, or weak positive ER status. The probability of finding IC is ~50% lower in cases of ER and progesterone receptor (PgR) negative tumors. Repeat testing may be warranted in 13.1% (92/700) of all cases due to lack of IC. In conclusion, the new ASCO/CAP guidelines recommend laboratories to establish and follow SOP to confirm or adjudicate ER results for about 30% of the cases before reporting hormone receptors status. Over 40% of cases with <10% tumor ER positivity lacked IC that may need a comment per the guidelines indicating a repeat testing may be warranted. However, the presence/absence of IC may be related to the subtype of breast cancer and should not necessarily bring into question the validity of the test.

Journal

Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology – Wolters Kluwer Health

Published: Dec 9, 2020

There are no references for this article.