Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Synoptic Reporting: Evidence-Based Review and Future Directions

Synoptic Reporting: Evidence-Based Review and Future Directions review article Synoptic Reporting: Evidence-Based Review and Future Directions INTRODUCTION structured reporting. The final product includes discrete data embedded in laboratory informa- Synoptic reporting is a process for reporting tion systems (LISs) and structured messaging/ specific data elements in a specific format in 10,11 data exchange standards (level 6). surgical pathology reports. Previously, surgical Synoptic reporting has many different conno- pathology reports were free text, highly narrative, tations, which depend on the stakeholder. For and prone to omission of necessary data and 1 practicing pathologists, synoptic reporting refers inconsistencies in formatting. Synoptic report- to specific elements in the cancer protocols ing not only ensures that all reports contain all and a specific format required by the CAP LAP necessary data elements, but also is amenable checklist. For clinicians, synoptic reporting pro- to scalable data capture, interoperability, and 2 vides a checklist that ensures completeness of exchange. Efforts are ongoing to create national 3-7 reported data elements. For registrars, research- and international health care meaningful use ers, and data scientists, synoptic reporting standards by using cancer registries and health denotes a means to populate structured data- information exchanges for storing and accessing bases. Although substantial overlap exists, the data. Ideally, http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics Wolters Kluwer Health

Synoptic Reporting: Evidence-Based Review and Future Directions

Download PDF
9 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wolters-kluwer-health/synoptic-reporting-evidence-based-review-and-future-directions-JnQnaDsZxX
Publisher
Wolters Kluwer Health
Copyright
(C) 2018 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
ISSN
2473-4276
DOI
10.1200/CCI.17.00088
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

review article Synoptic Reporting: Evidence-Based Review and Future Directions INTRODUCTION structured reporting. The final product includes discrete data embedded in laboratory informa- Synoptic reporting is a process for reporting tion systems (LISs) and structured messaging/ specific data elements in a specific format in 10,11 data exchange standards (level 6). surgical pathology reports. Previously, surgical Synoptic reporting has many different conno- pathology reports were free text, highly narrative, tations, which depend on the stakeholder. For and prone to omission of necessary data and 1 practicing pathologists, synoptic reporting refers inconsistencies in formatting. Synoptic report- to specific elements in the cancer protocols ing not only ensures that all reports contain all and a specific format required by the CAP LAP necessary data elements, but also is amenable checklist. For clinicians, synoptic reporting pro- to scalable data capture, interoperability, and 2 vides a checklist that ensures completeness of exchange. Efforts are ongoing to create national 3-7 reported data elements. For registrars, research- and international health care meaningful use ers, and data scientists, synoptic reporting standards by using cancer registries and health denotes a means to populate structured data- information exchanges for storing and accessing bases. Although substantial overlap exists, the data. Ideally,

Journal

JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics – Wolters Kluwer Health

Published: Mar 7, 2018

References

  • Utility and applications of synoptic reporting in pathology
    Amin W; Sirintrapun SJ; Parwani AV
  • About HealthIT
    Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology
  • Welcome to the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR)
    International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting
  • Data set for reporting of endometrial carcinomas: Recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) between United Kingdom, United States, Canada, and Australasia
    McCluggage WG; Colgan T; Duggan M
  • Dataset for reporting of prostate carcinoma in radical prostatectomy specimens: Recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting
    Kench JG; Delahunt B; Griffiths DF
  • Data set for reporting of lung carcinomas: Recommendations from International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting
    Jones KD; Churg A; Henderson DW
  • ICCR Harmonisation Guidelines, 2016
    International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting
  • Cancer Protocol Templates, 2018
    College of American Pathologists
  • Commission on Laboratory Accreditation Laboratory Accreditation Program
    College of American Pathologists
  • Does standardised structured reporting contribute to quality in diagnostic pathology
    Ellis DW; Srigley J
  • Standardized synoptic cancer pathology reporting: A population-based approach
    Srigley JR; McGowan T; Maclean A
  • What impact has the introduction of a synoptic report for rectal cancer had on reporting outcomes for specialist gastrointestinal and nongastrointestinal pathologists
    Messenger DE; McLeod RS; Kirsch R
  • Interinstitutional assessment of colorectal carcinoma surgical pathology report adequacy
    Zarbo RJ
  • Adequacy of surgical pathology reporting of cancer: A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 86 institutions
    Idowu MO; Bekeris LG; Raab S
  • Lung carcinoma surgical pathology report adequacy: A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of over 8300 cases from 464 institutions
    Gephardt GN; Baker PB
  • Challenges and opportunities in the adoption of College of American Pathologists checklists in electronic format: Perspectives and experience of Reporting Pathology Protocols Project (RPP2) participant laboratories
    Hassell LA; Parwani AV; Weiss L
  • The impact of template format on the completeness of surgical pathology reports
    Renshaw SA; Mena-Allauca M; Touriz M
  • Standardized and structured histopathological evaluation of colorectal polyps: A practical checklist against the background of the new WHO classification [in German]
    Baretton GB; Tannapfel A; Schmitt W
  • Structured electronic template for histopathology reporting on colorectal carcinoma resections: Five-year follow-up shows sustainable long-term quality improvement
    Casati B; Bjugn R
  • Recent advances in standards for collaborative digital anatomic pathology
    Daniel C; Macary F; Rojo MG
  • The effect of four interventions on the informational content of histopathology reports of resected colorectal carcinomas
    Cross SS; Feeley KM; Angel CA
  • Clinically relevant breast cancer reporting: Using process measures to improve anatomic pathology reporting
    Hammond EH; Flinner RL
  • Synoptic reporting improves histopathological assessment of pancreatic resection specimens
    Gill AJ; Johns AL; Eckstein R
  • The advantage of using a synoptic pathology report format for cutaneous melanoma
    Karim RZ; van den Berg KS; Colman MH
  • Synoptic pathology reporting for thyroid cancer: A review and institutional experience
    Lam E; Vy N; Bajdik C
  • Usefulness of a synoptic data tool for reporting of head and neck neoplasms based on the College of American Pathologists cancer checklists
    Kang HP; Devine LJ; Piccoli AL
  • Formatting pathology reports: Applying four design principles to improve communication and patient safety
    Valenstein PN
  • Performance of a Web-based method for generating synoptic reports
    Renshaw MA; Renshaw SA; Mena-Allauca M
  • The cost of synoptic reporting
    Renshaw AA; Gould EW
  • Just say no to the use of no: Alternative terminology for improving anatomic pathology reports
    Renshaw MA; Gould EW; Renshaw A
  • Reflex test reminders in required cancer synoptic templates decrease order entry error: An analysis of mismatch repair immunohistochemical orders to screen for Lynch syndrome
    Kilgore MR; McIlwain CA; Schmidt RA
  • An enterprise approach for pathology reporting utilizing PDF functionality for the electronic medical record
    Zhao T; Stamelos EMS; Tsividakis G
  • How many variables can humans process
    Halford GS; Baker R; McCredden JE
  • GeneMed: An informatics hub for the coordination of next-generation sequencing studies that support precision oncology clinical trials
    Zhao Y; Polley EC; Li MC
  • A decision support framework for genomically informed investigational cancer therapy
    Meric-Bernstam F; Johnson A; Holla V
  • A visual analytics agenda
    Thomas JJ; Cook KA
  • VAC 2017 (8th workshop on Visual Analytics in Healthcare), 2017
    Visual Analytics in Healthcare
  • Reporting Gleason grade/score in synoptic reports of radical prostatectomies
    Renshaw AA; Mena-Allauca M; Gould EW
  • Comparison of accuracy and speed of information identification by nonpathologists in synoptic reports with different formats
    Renshaw AA; Gould EW
  • Renshaw AA, Mena-Allauca M, Gould EW
    Renshaw AA; Mena-Allauca M; Gould EW
  • F-shaped pattern of reading on the Web: Misunderstood, but still relevant (even on mobile), 2016
    Pernice K
  • College of American Pathologists Cancer Protocols: Optimizing format for accuracy and efficiency
    Strickland-Marmol LB; Muro-Cacho CA; Barnett SD
  • Consciousness and the prefrontal parietal network: Insights from attention, working memory, and chunking
    Bor D; Seth AK
  • Interlaboratory Comparision Program in Gynecologic Cytopathology (PAP) Year End Summary Report
    College of American Pathologists
  • Murdoch T, Detsky A
    Murdoch T; Detsky A
  • Understanding big data: The seven V's, 2017
    Dataconomy
  • Performance of a Web-based method for generating synoptic reports
    Renshaw MA; Renshaw SA; Mena-Allauca M
  • Visual analytics in healthcare-pportunities and research challenges
    Caban JJ; Gotz D
  • Electronic pathology reporting: Digitizing the College of American Pathologists Cancer Checklists
    de Baca ME; Madden JF; Kennedy M
  • Checklists, protocols, and the "gold standard" approach
    Washington MK; Baker TP; Simpson J
  • Cancer biomarkers: The role of structured data reporting
    Simpson RW; Berman MA; Foulis PR
  • Structured electronic health records
    Bjugn R; Casati B; Haugland HK
  • Electronic capture and communication of synoptic cancer data elements from pathology reports: Results of the Reporting Pathology Protocols 2 (RPP2) project
    Hassell L; Aldinger W; Moody C
  • Synoptic tool for reporting of hematological and lymphoid neoplasms based on World Health Organization classification and College of American Pathologists checklist
    Mohanty SK; Piccoli AL; Devine LJ
  • Health information systems
    Sirintrapun SJ; Artz DR
  • Current status of discrete data capture in synoptic surgical pathology and cancer reporting
    Williams CL; Bjugn R; Hassell L
  • Penetrance of colorectal cancer among MLH1/MSH2 carriers participating in the colorectal cancer familial registry in Ontario
    Choi YH; Cotterchio M; McKeown-Eyssen G
  • CAP eFRM electronic synoptic reporting software, 2017
    California Cancer Registry
  • AACR Project GENIE, 2017
    American Association for Cancer Research
  • CBioPortal for Cancer Genomics
    CBioPortal for Cancer Genomics
  • Translational bioinformatics and clinical research (biomedical) informatics
    Sirintrapun SJ; Zehir A; Syed A
  • Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal
    Gao J; Aksoy BA; Dogrusoz U
  • HL7 CDA Release 2 implementation guide: Reporting to public health cancer registries from ambulatory healthcare providers, release 1, DSTU release 1
    Health Level Seven International
  • Just-in-time coding of the problem list in a clinical environment
    Warren JJ; Collins J; Sorrentino C