Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Parker, S. Kuzulugil, Kirill Pereverzev, S. Mac, G. Lopes, Zain Shah, Ashini Weerasinghe, Daniel Rubinger, Adam Falconi, Ayse Bener, Bora Caglayan, Rohan Tangri, N. Mitsakakis (2021)
Does biomarker use in oncology improve clinical trial failure risk? A large‐scale analysisCancer Medicine, 10
J. Ross, E. Slodkowska, W. Symmans, L. Pusztai, P. Ravdin, G. Hortobagyi (2009)
The HER-2 receptor and breast cancer: ten years of targeted anti-HER-2 therapy and personalized medicine.The oncologist, 14 4
L. Khoja, M. Butler, S. Kang, S. Ebbinghaus, A. Joshua (2015)
PembrolizumabJournal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, 3
J. Jørgensen, H. Winther, J. Askaa, L. Andresen, D. Olsen, J. Mollerup (2021)
A Companion Diagnostic With Significant Clinical Impact in Treatment of Breast and Gastric CancerFrontiers in Oncology, 11
John Pfeifer, Robert Loberg, Catherine Lofton-Day, Barbara Zehnbauer (2021)
Reference Samples to Compare Next-Generation Sequencing Test Performance for Oncology Therapeutics and Diagnostics.American journal of clinical pathology
J. Jørgensen, Maria Hersom (2018)
Clinical and Regulatory Aspects of Companion Diagnostic Development in OncologyClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 103
S. Lincoln, T. Hambuch, J. Zook, S. Bristow, K. Hatchell, R. Truty, M. Kennemer, B. Shirts, A. Fellowes, S. Chowdhury, E. Klee, S. Mahamdallie, M. Cleveland, P. Vallone, Yan Ding, S. Seal, W. DeSilva, F. Tomson, Catherine Huang, R. Garlick, N. Rahman, M. Salit, S. Kingsmore, M. Ferber, S. Aradhya, R. Nussbaum (2020)
One in seven pathogenic variants can be challenging to detect by NGS: an analysis of 450,000 patients with implications for clinical sensitivity and genetic test implementationGenetics in Medicine, 23
A. Gongora, Leandro Oliveira, D. Jardim (2020)
Impact of the biomarker enrichment strategy in drug developmentExpert Review of Molecular Diagnostics, 20
Within hematology and oncology, companion diagnostics (CDxs) play an increasing role in securing an optimal therapy for individual patients, and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) consider this type of assay essential for the safe and effective use of a corresponding therapeutic product. Most CDxs are developed prospectively using the drug-diagnostic codevelopment model, which normally secures the simultaneous approval of both drugs and diagnostics. A CDx assay is an important treatment decision tool that needs to be available simultaneously with the drug. However, within the past few years, several targeted drugs and new indications have been approved by the FDA without a CDx, despite the use of a predictive biomarker assay for patient selection during clinical development. A missing analytical and clinically validated CDx assay could affect the correct use of these drugs and ultimately patient safety. An alternative to FDA-approved or FDA-cleared CDxs could be to use a laboratory-developed test, which will normally miss documentation on the clinical validity. On the basis of the information available from different publicly available FDA databases, this article briefly discusses the issue of missing CDx assays in relation to the approval of hematological and oncological drugs and new indications.
JCO: Precision Oncology – Wolters Kluwer Health
Published: Jun 16, 2022
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.