Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Is less more in the surgical treatment of early-stage cervical cancer?

Is less more in the surgical treatment of early-stage cervical cancer? Purpose of reviewThis article discusses recent developments towards less radical surgical treatment for early-stage cervical cancer.Recent findingsSurgery is the standard treatment for early-stage cervical cancer. In the last decades, new treatment strategies have been developed aiming to reduce morbidity, without hampering oncological safety. We provide an update of the latest knowledge on safety and morbidity following less radical surgical procedures in early-stage cervical cancer. In cervical cancer with a tumour size of 2 cm or less, radical surgery (simple hysterectomy or fertility-sparing conisation) may be a well tolerated option. For patients with larger lesions (>2 cm) and wishing to preserve fertility, administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by less extensive surgery appears to be a feasible and well tolerated alternative to abdominal trachelectomy. With regard to lymph node assessment, increasing evidence shows the feasibility of the sentinel lymph node procedure instead of full pelvic lymphadenectomy. Prospective trials reporting on oncological safety are awaited.It is important to exercise caution when new surgical strategies are introduced. Despite promising retrospective data, prospective randomized studies may present unexpected results, for instance, minimally invasive radical hysterectomy showed inferior results compared to laparotomy.SummaryThere is a shift towards less radical treatment for early-stage cervical cancer. This review explores whether and when less is really more. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Current Opinion in Oncology Wolters Kluwer Health

Is less more in the surgical treatment of early-stage cervical cancer?

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wolters-kluwer-health/is-less-more-in-the-surgical-treatment-of-early-stage-cervical-cancer-2LCfHVKoT0

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Wolters Kluwer Health
Copyright
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1040-8746
eISSN
1531-703X
DOI
10.1097/cco.0000000000000863
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose of reviewThis article discusses recent developments towards less radical surgical treatment for early-stage cervical cancer.Recent findingsSurgery is the standard treatment for early-stage cervical cancer. In the last decades, new treatment strategies have been developed aiming to reduce morbidity, without hampering oncological safety. We provide an update of the latest knowledge on safety and morbidity following less radical surgical procedures in early-stage cervical cancer. In cervical cancer with a tumour size of 2 cm or less, radical surgery (simple hysterectomy or fertility-sparing conisation) may be a well tolerated option. For patients with larger lesions (>2 cm) and wishing to preserve fertility, administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by less extensive surgery appears to be a feasible and well tolerated alternative to abdominal trachelectomy. With regard to lymph node assessment, increasing evidence shows the feasibility of the sentinel lymph node procedure instead of full pelvic lymphadenectomy. Prospective trials reporting on oncological safety are awaited.It is important to exercise caution when new surgical strategies are introduced. Despite promising retrospective data, prospective randomized studies may present unexpected results, for instance, minimally invasive radical hysterectomy showed inferior results compared to laparotomy.SummaryThere is a shift towards less radical treatment for early-stage cervical cancer. This review explores whether and when less is really more.

Journal

Current Opinion in OncologyWolters Kluwer Health

Published: Sep 25, 2022

References