Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

How to Phrase Feedback in Peer Reviews for Nurse Authors?

How to Phrase Feedback in Peer Reviews for Nurse Authors? Peer review is a standing tradition for the validation of scholarly work. Nursing journals that utilize peer review need expert reviewers to provide feedback to the editors to make publication decisions. The authors also benefit from the peer reviewers’ feedback. However, the tone and wording of the critique should be honest and compassionate. Authors need to be guided and encouraged to improve their writing. Peer reviewers have a unique position to provide for the sustained addition of scholarly works and develop the authors who provide this content to the profession of nursing. This article seeks to convey these themes to the reader. Key words: author, peer review, profession, reviewer EER REVIEW in scholarly nursing jour- publication decision regarding the submitted nals is a tradition used to provide feed- manuscript. Pback to both the author and editor. The author is to receive guidance to develop or re- fine the manuscript in preparation for publica- PEER REVIEW FOR NURSING PUBLICATIONS tion. The editor receives counsel to make ra- As with any novice, authors need support tional publication decisions. This article will and encouragement to develop confidence focus on how to frame and phrase feedback in their craft, a sense of group http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal Wolters Kluwer Health

How to Phrase Feedback in Peer Reviews for Nurse Authors?

Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal , Volume 32 (4) – Oct 1, 2010

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wolters-kluwer-health/how-to-phrase-feedback-in-peer-reviews-for-nurse-authors-quest-UwGYmq8700

References (13)

Copyright
© 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
ISSN
1931-4485
eISSN
1931-4493
DOI
10.1097/TME.0b013e3181f5819b
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Peer review is a standing tradition for the validation of scholarly work. Nursing journals that utilize peer review need expert reviewers to provide feedback to the editors to make publication decisions. The authors also benefit from the peer reviewers’ feedback. However, the tone and wording of the critique should be honest and compassionate. Authors need to be guided and encouraged to improve their writing. Peer reviewers have a unique position to provide for the sustained addition of scholarly works and develop the authors who provide this content to the profession of nursing. This article seeks to convey these themes to the reader. Key words: author, peer review, profession, reviewer EER REVIEW in scholarly nursing jour- publication decision regarding the submitted nals is a tradition used to provide feed- manuscript. Pback to both the author and editor. The author is to receive guidance to develop or re- fine the manuscript in preparation for publica- PEER REVIEW FOR NURSING PUBLICATIONS tion. The editor receives counsel to make ra- As with any novice, authors need support tional publication decisions. This article will and encouragement to develop confidence focus on how to frame and phrase feedback in their craft, a sense of group

Journal

Advanced Emergency Nursing JournalWolters Kluwer Health

Published: Oct 1, 2010

There are no references for this article.