Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
L. Bell (2015)
Code of ethics for nurses with interpretive statements.The Alabama nurse, 30 2
G. Alexander (2005)
A Guide to Reviewing ManuscriptsMaternal and Child Health Journal, 9
Joyce Griffin-Sobel (2004)
Tips for Reviewing ManuscriptsClinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 8
R. Foster (2002)
The fine art of critique.Journal for specialists in pediatric nursing : JSPN, 7 2
K. Heinrich (2008)
Best review practises: Support nurse authors with compassionate critique, 18
M. Wurzbach (2007)
Manuscript Reviewing: An Ethical Perspective, 17
J. Aucoin (2004)
Nursing: Scope and Standards of PracticeJournal of Radiology Nursing, 23
(2007)
Reviewing journal manuscripts
Martha Griffin (2004)
Teaching cognitive rehearsal as a shield for lateral violence: an intervention for newly licensed nurses.Journal of continuing education in nursing, 35 6
D. Benos, K. Kirk, J. Hall (2003)
How to review a paper.Advances in physiology education, 27 1-4
K. Oman (2009)
Peer review: the art of supporting colleagues and advancing our profession.Journal of emergency nursing: JEN : official publication of the Emergency Department Nurses Association, 35 4
M. Shattell, P. Chinn, Sandra Thomas, W. Cowling, APRN-BC (2010)
Authors' and editors' perspectives on peer review quality in three scholarly nursing journals.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing, 42 1
K. Hoyt, J. Proehl (2007)
Peer Review for Professional PublicationsAdvanced Emergency Nursing Journal, 29
Peer review is a standing tradition for the validation of scholarly work. Nursing journals that utilize peer review need expert reviewers to provide feedback to the editors to make publication decisions. The authors also benefit from the peer reviewers’ feedback. However, the tone and wording of the critique should be honest and compassionate. Authors need to be guided and encouraged to improve their writing. Peer reviewers have a unique position to provide for the sustained addition of scholarly works and develop the authors who provide this content to the profession of nursing. This article seeks to convey these themes to the reader. Key words: author, peer review, profession, reviewer EER REVIEW in scholarly nursing jour- publication decision regarding the submitted nals is a tradition used to provide feed- manuscript. Pback to both the author and editor. The author is to receive guidance to develop or re- fine the manuscript in preparation for publica- PEER REVIEW FOR NURSING PUBLICATIONS tion. The editor receives counsel to make ra- As with any novice, authors need support tional publication decisions. This article will and encouragement to develop confidence focus on how to frame and phrase feedback in their craft, a sense of group
Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal – Wolters Kluwer Health
Published: Oct 1, 2010
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.