Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. Sgueglia, A. Giorgio, A. Gaspardone, A. Babunashvili (2018)
Anatomic Basis and Physiological Rationale of Distal Radial Artery Access for Percutaneous Coronary and Endovascular Procedures.JACC. Cardiovascular interventions, 11 20
Stephan Achenbach, Helmut Baumgartner, J. Bax, V. Dean, Christi Deaton, Çetin Erol, R. Fagard, Roberto Ferrari, Arno Hoes, Paulus Kirchhof, Juhani Knuuti, Philippe Kolh, Patrizio Lancellotti, Petros Nihoyannopoulos, M. Piepoli, P. Ponikowski, M. Tendera, A. Torbicki, W. Wijns, Stephan Windecker, A. Anyanwu, Andreas Baumbach, F. Beygui, N. Bonaros, Dobromir Dobrev, Joel Dunning, Eric Eeckhout, Stephan Gielen, H. Luckraz, Heiko Mahrholdt, Gilles Montalescot, Domenico Paparella, Ardawan Rastan, Marcelo Sanmartin, S. Silber, J. Tamargo, J. Berg, Holger Thiele, R. Geuns, Hans-Otto Wagner, S. Wassmann, Olaf Wendler (2014)
ESC / EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization
M. Page, J. McKenzie, P. Bossuyt, I. Boutron, T. Hoffmann, C. Mulrow, Larissa Shamseer, J. Tetzlaff, E. Akl, S. Brennan, R. Chou, Julie Glanville, J. Grimshaw, A. Hrõbjartsson, M. Lalu, Tianjing Li, E. Loder, E. Mayo-Wilson, Steve McDonald, L. McGuinness, L. Stewart, James Thomas, A. Tricco, V. Welch, P. Whiting, D. Moher (2020)
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviewsSystematic Reviews, 10
F. Neumann, M. Sousa‐Uva, A. Ahlsson, F. Alfonso, A. Banning, U. Benedetto, R. Byrne, J. Collet, V. Falk, S. Head, P. Jüni, A. Kastrati, A. Koller, S. Kristensen, J. Niebauer, D. Richter, P. Seferovic, D. Sibbing, G. Stefanini, S. Windecker, Rashmi Yadav, M. Zembala (2018)
2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization.European heart journal, 40 2
Sgueglia (2022)
International hand function study following distal radial access: the RATATOUILLE study.Cardiovasc Interv, 15
A. Elbadawi, I. Elgendy, Xiao-ling Jia, Mohamed Hamed, Mina Shnoda, M. Eid, Faisal Rahman, Umair Khalid, D. Paniagua, H. Jneid (2022)
Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials Comparing Distal Transradial Versus Conventional Transradial Approach for Coronary Procedures.The American journal of cardiology
M. Koutouzis, E. Kontopodis, A. Tassopoulos, I. Tsiafoutis, Konstantina Katsanou, Aggeliki Rigatou, M. Didagelos, K. Andreou, E. Lazaris, N. Oikonomidis, C. Maniotis, A. Ziakas (2019)
Distal versus traditional radial approach for coronary angiography.Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions
(2022)
Distal versus conventional radial access for coronary angiography and intervention: the DISCO RADIAL trial.
P. Mason, Binita Shah, J. Tamis-Holland, J. Bittl, Mauricio Cohen, Jordan Safirstein, D. Drachman, J. Valle, Denise Rhodes, I. Gilchrist (2018)
An Update on Radial Artery Access and Best Practices for Transradial Coronary Angiography and Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart AssociationCirculation: Cardiovascular Interventions, 11
G. Sgueglia, A. Hassan, S. Harb, T. Ford, L. Koliastasis, A. Milkas, D. Zappi, Andrés Lecaro, Eugenio Ionescu, Stephen Rankin, C. Said, Bibi Kuiper, F. Kiemeneij (2022)
International Hand Function Study Following Distal Radial Access: The RATATOUILLE Study.JACC. Cardiovascular interventions
M. Rashid, C. Kwok, S. Pancholy, S. Chugh, S. Kedev, I. Bernat, K. Ratib, A. Large, D. Fraser, J. Nolan, M. Mamas (2016)
Radial Artery Occlusion After Transradial Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta‐AnalysisJournal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease, 5
R. Prasad, Pranay Pandrangi, Gautam Pandrangi, Heesoo Yoo, A. Salazar, Esosa Ukponmwan, Michael Kehdi, G. Abela (2021)
Meta-Analysis Comparing Distal Radial Artery Approach Versus Traditional for Coronary Procedures.The American journal of cardiology
V. Vefalı, E. Sarıçam (2020)
The comparison of traditional radial access and novel distal radial access for cardiac catheterization.Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions
Grigorios Tsigkas, A. Papageorgiou, A. Moulias, A. Kalogeropoulos, C. Papageorgopoulou, A. Apostolos, A. Papanikolaou, G. Vasilagkos, P. Davlouros (2021)
Distal or Traditional Transradial Access Site for Coronary Procedures: A Single-Center, Randomized Study.JACC. Cardiovascular interventions
G. Eid-Lidt, Agustín Rodríguez, Joaquín Castellanos, J. Pasos, Kathia López, J. Gaspar (2021)
Distal Radial Artery Approach to Prevent Radial Artery Occlusion Trial.JACC. Cardiovascular interventions, 14 4
S. Lucreziotti, S. Persampieri, Domitilla Gentile, L. Barbieri, Diego Salerno-Uriarte, Federica Valli, L. Sabatelli, G. Panzacchi, M. Centola, S. Carugo (2021)
Access-site hematoma in distal and conventional transradial access: a randomized trial.Minerva cardiology and angiology
Y. Sandoval, M. Bell, R. Gulati (2019)
Transradial Artery Access Complications.Circulation: Cadiovascular Interventions
Background: Distal trans-radial access (dTRA) is a novel technique of arterial cannulation in coronary interventions. The comparative efficacy of dTRA and conventional trans-radial access (TRA) in attenuating peri-procedural complications is unknown. Methods: Embase and PubMed/MEDLINE were searched from their inception until June 25, 2022, for randomized clinical trials. Outcomes included were radial artery occlusion (RAO), radial artery spasm, hemostasis time, access time, unsuccessful cannulation, crossover rate, and early discharge after trans-radial stenting of coronary arteries (EASY) type I-III hematomas. Statistical analysis was conducted using the random effects model to derive risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: A total of 6 randomized clinical trials comprising 3240 patients were included. Subjects were predominantly male (73%) and had a mean age of 66 years. The dTRA group had a lower risk of RAO [RR 0.43 (95% CI, 0.26-0.69); P = 0.0005; I2 = 0%] and had a shorter hemostasis time [MD −22.85 min (95% CI, −39.06 to −6.65); P = 0.006; I2 = 99%]. The dTRA group had a higher crossover rate [RR 3.04 (95% CI, 1.88-4.91); P = 0.00001; I2 = 56%] and a longer access time [MD 0.68 min (95% CI, 0.17-1.18); P = 0.009; I2 = 99%]. The TRA group had a lower rate of unsuccessful cannulation [RR 0.81 (95% CI, 0.70-0.95); P = 0.01; I2 = 92%]. There was no significant difference between the groups for radial artery spasm and EASY type I-III hematomas. Conclusion: dTRA is a safe alternative to conventional TRA for coronary interventions with a lower risk of RAO. Future trials are required to further compare both approaches.
Critical Pathways in Cardiology – Wolters Kluwer Health
Published: Dec 1, 2022
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.