Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Comparison Between Low (3:1) and High (6:1) Pitch for Routine Abdominal/Pelvic Imaging With Multislice Computed Tomography

Comparison Between Low (3:1) and High (6:1) Pitch for Routine Abdominal/Pelvic... The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of low helical pitch acquisition (3:1) and high helical pitch acquisition (6:1) for routine abdominal/pelvic imaging with multislice computed tomography (CT). http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography Wolters Kluwer Health

Comparison Between Low (3:1) and High (6:1) Pitch for Routine Abdominal/Pelvic Imaging With Multislice Computed Tomography

Download PDF
5 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wolters-kluwer-health/comparison-between-low-3-colon-1-and-high-6-colon-1-pitch-for-routine-0Tk4EFx2rC

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

ISSN
0363-8715
eISSN
1532-3145

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of low helical pitch acquisition (3:1) and high helical pitch acquisition (6:1) for routine abdominal/pelvic imaging with multislice computed tomography (CT).

Journal

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography – Wolters Kluwer Health

Published: Mar 1, 2003

There are no references for this article.