Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Kriege, C. Brekelmans, C. Boetes, Peter Besnard, H. Zonderland, I. Obdeijn, R. Manoliu, T. Kok, H. Peterse, M. Tilanus-Linthorst, S. Muller, S. Meijer, J. Oosterwijk, L. Beex, R. Tollenaar, H. Koning, E. Rutgers, J. Klijn (2004)
Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition.The New England journal of medicine, 351 5
(2016)
Study on wide-beam-excitation-based high-frame-rate ultrasound imaging
R. Barr (2014)
Elastography in clinical practice.Radiologic clinics of North America, 52 6
K. Levental, Hongmei Yu, L. Kass, J. Lakins, M. Egeblad, J. Erler, S. Fong, K. Csiszȧr, A. Giaccia, W. Weninger, M. Yamauchi, D. Gasser, V. Weaver (2009)
Matrix Crosslinking Forces Tumor Progression by Enhancing Integrin SignalingCell, 139
M. Daugschies, K. Rohde, C. Glüer, R. Barkmann (2014)
The preliminary evaluation of a 1 MHz ultrasound probe for measuring the elastic anisotropy of human cortical bone.Ultrasonics, 54 1
Jianqiao Zhou, Zhifang Yang, W. Zhan, Yijie Dong, Chun Zhou (2016)
Anisotropic Properties of Breast Tissue Measured by Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Quantification.Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 42 10
J. Ophir, I. Céspedes, H. Ponnekanti, Y. Yazdi, X. Li (1991)
Elastography: A Quantitative Method for Imaging the Elasticity of Biological TissuesUltrasonic Imaging, 13
Su Lee, J. Chang, Won Kim, M. Bae, M. Seo, H. Koo, A. Chu, H. Gweon, N. Cho, W. Moon (2014)
Added value of shear-wave elastography for evaluation of breast masses detected with screening US imaging.Radiology, 273 1
F. Schaefer, A. Waldmann, A. Katalinic, C. Wefelnberg, M. Heller, W. Jonat, I. Schreer (2010)
Influence of additional breast ultrasound on cancer detection in a cohort study for quality assurance in breast diagnosis—analysis of 102,577 diagnostic proceduresEuropean Radiology, 20
Inger-Lise Nesvold, A. Dahl, E. Løkkevik, Anne Mengshoel, S. Fosså (2008)
Arm and shoulder morbidity in breast cancer patients after breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomyActa Oncologica, 47
M. Bai, L. Du, Ji-ying Gu, Fan Li, X. Jia (2012)
Virtual Touch Tissue Quantification Using Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse TechnologyJournal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 31
S. Jodele, L. Blavier, J. Yoon, Y. DeClerck (2006)
Modifying the soil to affect the seed: role of stromal-derived matrix metalloproteinases in cancer progressionCancer and Metastasis Reviews, 25
(2014)
Correlation between shear wave elasticity and collagen fiber in breast disease
A. Nowicki, Bernardeta Licznerska, P. Rhone (2015)
Evaluation of the quality of life of women treated due to breast cancer using amputation or breast conserving surgery in the early postoperative period.Polski przeglad chirurgiczny, 87 4
M. Lobo, F. Moreno, G. Souza, S. Verde, R. Moreira, A. Monteiro-Moreira (2017)
Label-Free Proteome Analysis of Plasma from Patients with Breast Cancer: Stage-Specific Protein ExpressionFrontiers in Oncology, 7
Juan Xie, Rong Wu, Hui-Xiong Xu, Minghua Yao, Guang Xu (2014)
Relationship between parameters from virtual touch tissue quantification (VTQ) imaging with clinicopathologic prognostic factors in women with invasive ductal breast cancer.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 7 10
(2017)
Progresses and research direction of imaging diagnosis of breast cancer
Wanqing Chen, R. Zheng, Siwei Zhang, H. Zeng, T. Zuo, C. Xia, Zhixun Yang, Jie He (2017)
Cancer incidence and mortality in China in 2013: an analysis based on urbanization levelChinese Journal of Cancer Research, 29
A. Athanasiou, A. Tardivon, L. Ollivier, F. Thibault, C. Khoury, S. Neuenschwander (2009)
How to optimize breast ultrasound.European journal of radiology, 69 1
Limin Chen, Jun He, Gang Liu, K. Shao, Minda Zhou, Beilei Li, Xiaofei Chen (2014)
Diagnostic performances of shear-wave elastography for identification of malignant breast lesions: a meta-analysisJapanese Journal of Radiology, 32
P. Dempsey (2005)
2–13 Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers With Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Ultrasound, Mammography, and Clinical Breast Examination
J. Swets (1988)
Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems.Science, 240 4857
J. Ophir, B. Garra, F. Kallel, E. Konofagou, T. Krouskop, R. Righetti, T. Varghese (2000)
Elastographic imaging.Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 26 Suppl 1
T. Kolb, J. Lichy, J. Newhouse (1998)
Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US--diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics.Radiology, 207 1
M. Maliszewska, M. Maciążek-Jurczyk, J. Pożycka, A. Szkudlarek, M. Chudzik, A. Sułkowska (2016)
Fluorometric Investigation on the Binding of Letrozole and Resveratrol with Serum Albumin.Protein and peptide letters, 23 10
Dominik Maślach, Michalina Krzyżak, A. Szpak, I. Bojar, M. Bielska-Lasota, A. Owoc (2013)
The breast-conserving surgery of women with breast cancer in Podlaskie Voivodeship (Poland). Population study.Annals of agricultural and environmental medicine : AAEM, 20 2
JAMA, 292
D. Cosgrove, W. Berg, C. Doré, D. Skyba, J. Henry, J. Gay, C. Cohen-Bacrie (2011)
Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducibleEuropean Radiology, 22
Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic value of Young's modulus (E) and shear modulus (G) in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast masses using sound touch elastography (STE) and to explore the relationship between G and E in breast lesions. Methods A total of 96 consecutive women with 110 pathologically confirmed breast masses were included. All masses were detected by conventional and STE ultrasound. Emean, Emax, Emin, ESD, Gmean, Gmax, Gmin, and GSD were determined and evaluated for evidence of significant differences between benign and malignant breast masses. Receiver operator characteristics were used to compare the diagnostic efficacy of E and G and to determine the G cutoff value that would aid in the differential diagnosis of breast cancer. Results Emean, Emax, ESD, Gmean, Gmax, and GSD in cases of malignant breast masses were significantly higher than those in cases of benign masses (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between Emin and Gmin (P = 0.565). In applying the Emean, Emax, ESD, Gmean, Gmax, and GSD to the receiver operator characteristics: (1) the area under the curve (AUC) of Gmean and Gmax is greater than the AUC of Emean and Emax, and the AUC of ESD is equal to the AUC of GSD. (2) The sensitivity and specificity were highest when the Gmean was 10.14 kPa. They were 84.1% and 80.3% respectively. (3) The sensitivity and specificity were highest when the Gmax was 52.20 kPa. They were 88.6% and 87.9% respectively. Conclusions These preliminary results of STE evaluation of breast masses suggest that the diagnostic value of G is greater than E. Furthermore, STE is a valuable tool in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions.
Ultrasound quarterly – Wolters Kluwer Health
Published: Jan 1, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.