Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(2014)
Legitimation und Akzeptanz aus theologisch-ethischer Sicht
(2014)
Zur Kulturgeschichte eines christliche Kultes
(2014)
Menschsein im Spiegel des Neuen Testaments
Tr€ anen wegen eines Tieres? Zur Geschichte des Mitgef€ uhls in der christlichen Kultur
(2014)
Der andere in uns
Die Identit€ at des Menschen als Repr€ asentant Gottes in der Zeit
Domján Andrea, K. Péter, S. Judit (2014)
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki (WMA) - Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects, 24
(2013)
Xenotransplantation aus j€ udischer Perspektive
H. Joas (2015)
The Sacredness of the Person
(2014)
Alttestamentliche Zug€ange zum Menschen, zum Tier und zum Mensch-Tier-Verh€altnis
CCAR 5759-5767
bT Pesachim 25a-b; bT Sanhedrin 74a
(2014)
Xenotransplantation aus islamischer Perspektive
(2014)
Tr€anen wegen eines Tieres? Zur Geschichte des Mitgef€ uhls in der christlichen Kultur. In: zur debatte
Johannes Morsink (1999)
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Origins, Drafting, and IntentAmerican Journal of Legal History, 43
Background Unlike allotransplantation, reflections on xenotransplantation are infrequent in theological literature. However, xenotransplantation poses questions specifically concerning ethical and theological aspects that are imperative to address, such as personal identity between the poles of body, soul, and mind, the relationship between humans and animals, as well as challenges regarding specific issues of medical and social ethics. Method This study summarizes the lectures of the symposium on “Xenotransplantation—a challenge to theological ethics,” which took place in Munich from September 30 until October 2, 2013, and analyses the implications of xenotransplantation from the perspectives of Christian theological ethics, biblical theology, and systematic theology. Furthermore, the issue of xenotransplantation is addressed from the perspectives of Judaism and Islam. Beyond these theological deliberations, the metaphorical and religious meaning of the human heart, which may have an impact on the societal acceptability of xenotransplantation, as well as the Christian notion of compassion regarding animals, is analyzed from the perspective of historical sciences. Results and Conclusion According to the perspectives of Christianity, Judaism, and Islam, there are no specifically religious fundamental and generally binding reasons to prohibit xenotransplantation as a means of treating grave and life‐threatening organ insufficiencies.
Xenotransplantation – Wiley
Published: May 1, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.