Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J.G. Sutinen, P. Andersen (1985)
‘The economics of fisheries law enforcement’, vol
E. Bulte, G. Kooten (1999)
Economics of Antipoaching Enforcement and the Ivory Trade BanWiley-Blackwell: American Journal of Agricultural Economics
S.R. Milliman (1986)
‘Optimal fishery management in the presence of illegal activity’Land Economics, vol
M.Y. Said, R.N. Chunge, G.C. Craig, C.R. Thouless, R.F.W. Barnes, H.T. Dublin (1995)
African Elephant Database
M. Burton (1999)
An assessment of alternative methods of estimating the effect of the ivory trade ban on poaching effortEcological Economics, 30
M. Burton (1999)
‘An assessment of alternative methods of estimating the effect of the ivory ban on poaching effort’Journal of Economic Dynamics and Contrology, vol
P. Crabbe, N. Long (1993)
ENTRY DETERRENCE AND OVEREXPLOITATION OF THE FISHERYJournal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 17
(1986)
Optimal governing instrument, operation level
M. Kremer, C. Morcom (2000)
‘Elephants’Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol
Scott Milliman (1986)
Optimal fishery management in the presence of illegal activityJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 13
R. Alexander (2000)
Modelling species extinction: the case for non-consumptive valuesEcological Economics, 35
M. Coe (1992)
Elephants, Economics and IvoryJournal of Arid Environments, 22
(1999)
Economics of antipoaching enforcement
P. Crabbé, N.V. Long (1993)
‘Entry deterrence and overexploitation of the fishery’American Economic Review, vol
(2000)
World Resources 2000–2001
(1986)
Optimal governing instrument , operation level and enforcement in natural resource management : the case of the fishery
E.B. Barbier, C.B. Joanne, S. Timothy, W.P. David (1990)
Elephants, Economics and IvoryAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics
(1995)
African Elephant Database, International Union for the Conservation of
Markets for endangered species potentially generate incentives for both legal supply and poaching. To deter poaching, governments can spend on enforcement or increase legal harvesting to reduce the return from poaching. A leader–follower commitment game is developed to examine these choices in the presence of illegal harvesting and the resulting impacts on species stocks. In addition, current trade restrictions imposed under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora are examined. With Cournot conjectures among poachers, the model details the subgame perfect equilibrium interactions between poaching levels, enforcement and legal harvesting.
The Australian Journal of Agricultural Resource Economics – Wiley
Published: Dec 1, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.