Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Lisa Barrett, B. Mesquita, K. Ochsner, James Gross, Miriam Erez (2006)
Development in Societal Context An Interactionist Perspective on the Socioeconomic Context of Human Development
T. Heberlein (1988)
Improving interdisciplinary research: Integrating the social and natural sciencesSociety & Natural Resources, 1
C. Achterberg, Carla Miller (2004)
Is one theory better than another in nutrition education? A viewpoint: more is better.Journal of nutrition education and behavior, 36 1
K. Ochsner, Matthew Lieberman (2001)
The emergence of social cognitive neuroscience.The American psychologist, 56 9
Lele Lele, Norgaard Norgaard (2005)
Practicing interdisciplinarityBioscience, 55
J. Bruer (1997)
Education and the Brain: A Bridge Too FarEducational Researcher, 26
K. Bailey (2001)
Towards unifying science: Applying concepts across disciplinary boundariesSystems Research and Behavioral Science, 18
D. MacMynowski (2007)
Pausing at the Brink of Interdisciplinarity: Power and Knowledge at the Meeting of Social and Biophysical ScienceEcology and Society, 12
O. Svenson (1996)
Decision Making and the Search for Fundamental Psychological Regularities: What Can Be Learned from a Process Perspective?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65
O. Goodenough, M. Tucker (2010)
Law and Cognitive NeuroscienceAnnual Review of Law and Social Science, 6
U. Goswami (2006)
Neuroscience and education: from research to practice?Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7
G. Harrison (2008)
NEUROECONOMICS: A CRITICAL RECONSIDERATIONEconomics and Philosophy, 24
D. Pennington (2008)
Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration and LearningEcology and Society, 13
H. Bauer (1990)
Barriers Against Interdisciplinarity: Implications for Studies of Science, Technology, and Society (STSScience, Technology & Human Values, 15
M. Doucerain, L. Fellows (2012)
Eating Right: Linking Food‐Related Decision‐Making Concepts From Neuroscience, Psychology, and EducationMind, Brain, and Education, 6
T. Dalgleish, B. Dunn, D. Mobbs (2009)
Affective Neuroscience: Past, Present, and FutureEmotion Review, 1
R. Adolphs (2003)
Cognitive neuroscience: Cognitive neuroscience of human social behaviourNature Reviews Neuroscience, 4
L. Campbell (2005)
Overcoming Obstacles to Interdisciplinary ResearchConservation Biology, 19
B. Garland, P. Glimcher (2006)
Cognitive neuroscience and the lawCurrent Opinion in Neurobiology, 16
J. Sobal, C. Bisogni, M. Jastran (2014)
Food Choice Is Multifaceted, Contextual, Dynamic, Multilevel, Integrated, and DiverseMind, Brain, and Education, 8
G. Brewer (1999)
The challenges of interdisciplinarityPolicy Sciences, 32
D. Wear (1999)
Challenges to Interdisciplinary DiscourseEcosystems, 2
Lieberman Lieberman (2007)
Social cognitive neuroscience: A review of core processesAnnual Review of Psychology, 58
Loewenstein Loewenstein, Rick Rick, Cohen Cohen (2008)
NeuroeconomicsAnnual Review of Psychology, 59
R. Davidson, S. Sutton (1995)
Affective neuroscience: the emergence of a disciplineCurrent Opinion in Neurobiology, 5
J. Illes, M. Moser, Jennifer McCormick, E. Racine, S. Blakeslee, A. Caplan, E. Hayden, Jay Ingram, T. Lohwater, Peter McKnight, Christie Nicholson, A. Phillips, K. Sauvé, Elaine Snell, S. Weiss (2010)
Neurotalk: improving the communication of neuroscience researchNature Reviews Neuroscience, 11
This article is a response to Sobal, Bisogni, & Jastran's commentary (this issue) on Doucerain & Fellows (2012). We thank Sobal, Bisogni, & Jastran (this issue) for their detailed and constructive commentary and we welcome their willingness to engage in a dialogue on terms and concepts, one of the most important obstacles to interdisciplinary research (Bailey, ; Brewer, ). In their article, the commentators argue for reliance on the term food choice but note that “no one term is broad or open enough to capture the full range and scope of factors involved in eating” (Sobal, Bisogni, & Jastran, this issue, p. xx). We aspired to this broader meaning in introducing the term food‐related decision‐making instead of relying on one of the various existing narrower labels (Doucerain & Fellows, ). To us, the term food choice seemed to put too much of an emphasis on the eating episode (rather than the many other relevant preceding decision complexes), and in particular the aspect of what to eat (rather than the many other decision types). Food‐related decision‐making, in contrast, clearly extends beyond what to eat and implicitly acknowledges the importance of multiple decision complexes through its terminological connection with the
Mind, Brain, and Education – Wiley
Published: Mar 1, 2014
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.