Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Dunn, S. Steginga (2000)
Young women's experience of breast cancer: defining young and identifying concernsPsycho‐Oncology, 9
J. Ussher, L. Kirsten, P. Butow, M. Sandoval (2006)
What do cancer support groups provide which other supportive relationships do not? The experience of peer support groups for people with cancer.Social science & medicine, 62 10
J. Dunn, S. Steginga, S. Occhipinti, K. Wilson (1999)
Evaluation of a peer support program for women with breast cancer—lessons for practitionersJournal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 9
S. Sultan, D. Fisher, C. Voils, A. Kinney, R. Sandler, D. Provenzale (2004)
Impact of functional support on health‐related quality of life in patients with colorectal cancerCancer, 101
S. Steginga, J. Dunn (2001)
The young women's network: a case study in community developmentJournal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 11
L. Hoey, S. Ieropoli, V. White, M. Jefford (2008)
Systematic review of peer-support programs for people with cancer.Patient education and counseling, 70 3
F. Ashbury, C. Cameron, S. Mercer, M. Fitch, E. Nielsen (1998)
One-on-one peer support and quality of life for breast cancer patients.Patient education and counseling, 35 2
P. Vos, B. Garssen, A. Visser, H. Duivenvoorden, H. Haes (2004)
Psychosocial Intervention for Women with Primary, Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Comparison between Participants and Non-ParticipantsPsychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 73
C. Taylor (2001)
Patients' experiences of 'feeling on their own' following a diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a phenomenological approach.International journal of nursing studies, 38 6
J. Zabora, K. Brintzenhofeszoc, B. Curbow, C. Hooker, S. Piantadosi (2001)
The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer sitePsycho‐Oncology, 10
H. Halteren, G. Bongaerts, D. Wagener (2004)
Cancer and psychosocial distress: frequent companionsThe Lancet, 364
R. Gray, M. Fitch, C. Davis, C. Phillips (1997)
Interviews with men with Prostate Cancer about their Self-Help Group ExperienceJournal of Palliative Care, 13
B. Weber, B. Roberts, M. Resnick, G. Deimling, J. Zauszniewski, C. Musil, H. Yarandi (2004)
The effect of dyadic intervention on self‐efficacy, social support, and depression for men with prostate cancerPsycho‐Oncology, 13
S. Steginga, C. Pinnock, M. Gardner, J. Dunn, R. Gardiner (2002)
Peer support groups for prostate cancer in Australia: a snapshot in 2002, 26
J. Dunn, B. Lynch, M. Rinaldis, K. Pakenham, Lynne McPherson, N. Owen, B. Leggett, B. Newman, J. Aitken (2006)
Dimensions of quality of life and psychosocial variables most salient to colorectal cancer patientsPsycho‐Oncology, 15
Bret Shaw, F. McTavish, R. Hawkins, D. Gustafson, S. Pingree (2000)
Experiences of women with breast cancer: exchanging social support over the CHESS computer network.Journal of health communication, 5 2
O. Gilbar, Leora Basw (1992)
A Training Model of a Self-Help Group for Patients with Cancer of the ColonJournal of Psychosocial Oncology, 9
Andre Winzelberg, C. Classen, G. Alpers, Heidi Roberts, C. Koopman, Robert Adams, Heidemarie Ernst, P. Dev, C. Taylor (2003)
Evaluation of an internet support group for women with primary breast cancerCancer, 97
J. Dunn, B. Lynch, J. Aitken, B. Leggett, K. Pakenham, B. Newman (2003)
Quality of life and colorectal cancer: a reviewAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 27
J. Giese-Davis, Caroline Bliss-Isberg, K. Carson, Path Star, J. Donaghy, Matthew Cordova, N. Stevens, L. Wittenberg, C. Batten, D. Spiegel (2006)
The effect of peer counseling on quality of life following diagnosis of breast cancer: an observational studyPsycho‐Oncology, 15
J. Dunn, S. Steginga, Nicholas Rosoman, David Millichap (2003)
A Review of Peer Support in the Context of CancerJournal of Psychosocial Oncology, 21
C. Dennis (2003)
Peer support within a health care context: a concept analysis.International journal of nursing studies, 40 3
S. Steginga, C. Pinnock, M. Gardner, J. Dunn, R. Gardiner (2002)
Peer support groups for prostate cancer: a snapshot in 2002, 26
L. Carlson, L. Carlson, M. Angen, M. Angen, J. Cullum, E. Goodey, J. Koopmans, J. Koopmans, L. Lamont, J. MacRae, J. MacRae, M. Martín, Guy Pelletier, Guy Pelletier, J. Robinson, J. Robinson, J. Simpson, J. Simpson, M. Speca, M. Speca, L. Tillotson, B. Bultz, B. Bultz (2004)
High levels of untreated distress and fatigue in cancer patientsBritish Journal of Cancer, 90
H. Campbell, M. Phaneuf, K. Deane (2004)
Cancer peer support programs-do they work?Patient education and counseling, 55 1
IEROPOLI S.C., WHITE V.M., JEFFORD M. & AKKERMAN D. (2010) European Journal of Cancer Care What models of peer support do people with colorectal cancer prefer? While colorectal cancer is the most common cancer affecting both men and women in Australia, disease‐specific peer support services are lacking. This study examined the acceptability and preferred models of peer support among people with colorectal cancer. First, a mixed‐method study examined enablers and barriers to peer support participation and model preferences. Participants were recruited from metropolitan and regional areas of Victoria. Fifty‐three participants completed a questionnaire and four focus groups and 10 telephone interviews were conducted (n = 34). Participants demonstrated enthusiasm for peer support. Feeling unwell and worry about accessing toilet facilities were main barriers, while accessing information about treatment side effects and making treatment decisions were main positive features. Second, a pilot study determined the response to a face‐to‐face group and one‐on‐one telephone programme, the preferred models from study 1. In total, 34 support recipients recruited through clinicians, participated. Half elected to participate in the telephone programme and half in the group programme. Support recipients completed surveys before and after the programmes. Both models were acceptable to participants with high satisfaction rates reported (94–100%) and findings suggested that the two models catered to different peer support needs. Timing of referral and clinician promotion contributed to participation.
European Journal of Cancer Care – Wiley
Published: Jul 1, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.