Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Gower (1971)
A General Coefficient of Similarity and Some of Its PropertiesBiometrics, 27
M. Brambilla, M. Gustin, C. Celada (2013)
Species appeal predicts conservation statusBiological Conservation, 160
E. Laliberté, P. Legendre (2010)
A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits.Ecology, 91 1
J. Settele, T. Shreeve, M. Konvička, H. Dyck (2009)
Ecology of butterflies in Europe
Tijl Essens, F. Langevelde, R. Vos, C. Swaay, M. WallisDeVries (2017)
Ecological determinants of butterfly vulnerability across the European continentJournal of Insect Conservation, 21
(2016)
traits) were tested using a permutation test (envfit . For illustration, traits were plotted posthoc to the conducted in R 3.3.1
(2012)
Rote Liste und Gesamtartenliste der Tagfalter ( Rhapalocera ) 425 ( Lepidoptera : Papilionoidea et Hesperioidea ) Deutschlands
J. Habel, D. Rödder, T. Schmitt, G. Nève (2011)
Global warming will affect the genetic diversity and uniqueness of Lycaena helle populationsGlobal Change Biology, 17
D. Maes, R. Verovnik, M. Wiemers, Dimitri Brosens, S. Beshkov, S. Bonelli, J. Buszko, Lisette Cantú‐Salazar, L. Cassar, S. Collins, V. Dincă, Milorad Djurić, G. Dušej, Hallvard Elven, F. Franeta, P. Garcia-Pereira, Yurii Geryak, P. Goffart, Á. Gór, U. Hiermann, H. Höttinger, P. Huemer, P. Jakšić, E. John, H. Kalivoda, Vassiliki Kati, Paul Kirkland, B. Komac, Á. Kőrösi, A. Kulak, M. Kuussaari, Lionel L’Hoste, S. Lelo, Xavier Mestdagh, N. Micevski, Iva Mihoci, S. Mihut, Yeray Monasterio-León, D. Morgun, M. Munguira, T. Murray, P. Nielsen, E. Ólafsson, Erki Õunap, Lazaros Pamperis, Alois Pavlíčko, L. Pettersson, S. Popov, Miloš Popović, J. Pöyry, M. Prentice, Lien Reyserhove, N. Ryrholm, Martina Šašić, N. Savenkov, J. Settele, M. Sielezniew, S. Sinev, C. Stefanescu, G. Švitra, T. Tammaru, Anu Tiitsaar, E. Tzirkalli, Olga Tzortzakaki, C. Swaay, A. Viborg, I. Wynhoff, K. Zografou, M. Warren (2019)
Integrating national Red Lists for prioritising conservation actions for European butterfliesJournal of Insect Conservation, 23
J. Oksanen, F. Blanchet, R. Kindt, P. Legendre, RG O'Hara, GL Simpson, P. Minchin, RB O’Hara (2007)
vegan : Community Ecology Package. R package version 1.8-5
J.C. Habel, T. Schmitt (2014)
Jewels in the mist – A synopsis on the highly endangered butterfly species the Violet Copper, Lycaena helle
(2014)
Why protecting relict populations. In Jewels in the mist – A synopsis on the highly endangered butterfly species the Violet Copper, Lycaena helle: 231–235
(1997)
Butterflies of Britain and Europe
Jeremy Thomas (2016)
Butterfly communities under threatScience, 353
(1991)
Die Schmetterlinge Baden-Württembergs. Band 1 and 2, E. 352
Christopher Johnson (1998)
Species extinction and the relationship between distribution and abundanceNature, 394
G. Delpon, Hélène Vogt-Schilb, F. Munoz, F. Richard, B. Schatz (2018)
Diachronic variations in the distribution of butterflies and dragonflies linked to recent habitat changes in Western EuropeInsect Conservation and Diversity, 12
G. Delpon, H. Vogt‐Schilb, F. Munoz, F. Richard, B. Schatz (2018)
Recent trends in the distribution of butterflies and dragonflies linked to recent habitat changes in Western Europe, 12
D. Maes, S. Collins, M. Munguira, Martina Šašić, J. Settele, C. Swaay, R. Verovnik, M. Warren, M. Wiemers, I. Wynhoff (2013)
Not the Right Time to Amend the Annexes of the European Habitats DirectiveConservation Letters, 6
Spialia therapne, Zerynthia cretica Ecological specialists 39 Aricia morronensis, Cupido decoloratus, Erebia aethiopella
J. Habel, Julia Braun, C. Fischer, W. Weisser, M. Gossner (2015)
Population restoration of the nocturnal bird Athene noctua in Western Europe: an example of evidence based species conservationBiodiversity and Conservation, 24
F. Dyke (2002)
Conservation biology : foundations, concepts, applications / by Fred Van Dyke, 2003
(2014)
FD: measuring functional diversity from multiple traits, and other tools for functional ecology. R package version 1.0–12
Jean-Michel Roberge, P. Angelstam (2004)
Usefulness of the Umbrella Species Concept as a Conservation ToolConservation Biology, 18
B. Schatz, P. Gauthier, M. Debussche, J. Thompson (2014)
A decision tool for listing species for protection on different geographic scales and administrative levelsJournal for Nature Conservation, 22
(1992)
Ecologische atlas van de dagvlinders van Noordwest-Europa
Mathieu Coureuil, Florence Miller, Hervé Lécuyer, S. Bourdoulous, Guillaume Duménil, Babette Weksler, Ignacio Romero, P. Couraud (2009)
Successful Conservation of a Threatened Maculinea ButterflyScience, 325
N. Myers, R. Mittermeier, C. Mittermeier, G. Fonseca, J. Kent (2000)
Biodiversity hotspots for conservation prioritiesNature, 403
M. Mckinney (1997)
Extinction Vulnerability and Selectivity: Combining Ecological and Paleontological ViewsAnnual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 28
J. Habel, A. Segerer, W. Ulrich, Olena Torchyk, W. Weisser, T. Schmitt (2016)
Butterfly community shifts over two centuriesConservation Biology, 30
Anni Arponen (2012)
Prioritizing species for conservation planningBiodiversity and Conservation, 21
R. Lambeck (1997)
Focal Species: A Multi‐Species Umbrella for Nature ConservationConservation Biology, 11
P. Gauthier, M. Debussche, J. Thompson (2010)
Regional priority setting for rare species based on a method combining three criteriaBiological Conservation, 143
Benoı̂t Fontaine, Philippe Bouchet, K. Achterberg, M. Alonso-Zarazaga, Rafael Araujo, M. Asche, Ulrike Aspöck, P. Audisio, Berend Aukema, Nicolas Bailly, Maria Balsamo, Peter Barnard, Carlo Belfiore, W. Bogdanowicz, Tom Bongers, Geoffrey Boxshall, Daniel Burckhardt, J. Camicas, Przemek Chylarecki, P. Crucitti, Louis Deharveng, Alain Dubois, Henrik Enghoff, A. Faubel, R. Fochetti, O. Gargominy, David Gibson, Ray Gibson, Maria López, D. Goujet, Mark Harvey, K. Heller, Peter Helsdingen, H. Hoch, Herman Jong, Yde Jong, O. Karsholt, Wouter Los, Lars Lundqvist, Wojciech Magowski, R. Manconi, Jochen Martens, J. Massard, Gaby Massard-Geimer, S. McInnes, Luis Mendes, Eberhard Mey, V. Michelsen, Alessandro Minelli, Claus Nielsen, J. Nafría, E. Nieukerken, John Noyes, Thomas Pape, Hans Pohl, W. Prins, M. Ramos, Claudia Ricci, C. Roselaar, Emilia Rota, A. Schmidt-Rhaesa, Hendrik Segers, R. Strassen, A. Szeptycki, J. Thibaud, Alain Thomas, Tarmo Timm, J. Tol, Wim Vervoort, Rainer Willmann (2007)
The European union’s 2010 target: Putting rare species in focusBiological Conservation, 139
G. Ebert, E. Rennwald (1991)
Die Schmetterlinge Baden‐Württembergs
J. Podani (1999)
Extending Gower's general coefficient of similarity to ordinal charactersTaxon, 48
Jean-Michel Roberge, P. Angelstam (2016)
Usefulness of the Umbrella Species Concept
P. Cardoso (2012)
Habitats Directive species lists: urgent need of revisionInsect Conservation and Diversity, 5
(1995)
Butterflies of the Asian part of Russia. A handbook
than just butterflies, not only in Europe, but also in other regions of the tropics
p<0.01) (Permutation test with 1000 permutations). The species have wide Palaearctic distributions, low level of
E. Balletto, S. Bonelli, D. Patricelli (2010)
European red List of Butterflies
R. Home, C. Keller, P. Nagel, N. Bauer, M. Hunziker (2009)
Selection criteria for flagship species by conservation organizationsEnvironmental Conservation, 36
S. Harrison, J. Viers, J. Thorne, J. Grace (2008)
Favorable environments and the persistence of naturally rare speciesConservation Letters, 1
Gregory Ames, W. Wall, Matthew Hohmann, J. Wright (2017)
Trait space of rare plants in a fire‐dependent ecosystemConservation Biology, 31
S. Kark, N. Levin, H. Grantham, H. Possingham (2009)
Between-country collaboration and consideration of costs increase conservation planning efficiency in the Mediterranean BasinProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106
LeeE. Frelich (2009)
Conservation BiologyThe Quarterly Review of Biology, 84
B. Melbourne, A. Hastings (2008)
Extinction risk depends strongly on factors contributing to stochasticityNature, 454
A. Hampe, R. Petit (2005)
Conserving biodiversity under climate change: the rear edge matters.Ecology letters, 8 5
R. Team (2014)
R: A language and environment for statistical computing.MSOR connections, 1
(2011)
Butterflies of Europe and the Mediterranean area
(2008)
Favourable environments and the
M. Wiemers, E. Balletto, V. Dincă, Z. Fric, G. Lamas, V. Lukhtanov, M. Munguira, Chris A. M. van Swaay, R. Vilà, A. Vliegenthart, N. Wahlberg, R. Verovnik (2018)
An updated checklist of the European Butterflies (Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea)ZooKeys
C. Swaay, D. Maes, S. Collins, M. Munguira, Martina Šašić, J. Settele, R. Verovnik, M. Warren, M. Wiemers, I. Wynhoff, Annabelle Cuttelod (2011)
Applying IUCN criteria to invertebrates: How red is the Red List of European butterflies?Biological Conservation, 144
A. Rodrigues, J. Pilgrim, John Lamoreux, M. Hoffmann, T. Brooks (2006)
The value of the IUCN Red List for conservation.Trends in ecology & evolution, 21 2
(2015)
Distribution atlas of European butterflies and skippers
Prioritizing species for nature conservation should follow objective ecologically and biogeographically meaningful selection criteria. In this study, we test an approach to prioritize butterfly species for nature conservation considering the following parameters: (1) geographical distribution and endemicity, (2) vulnerability and (3) ecological specialization. Following these criteria, we identified 51 species of conservation priority out of the 403 European species assessed, that is 12.7%. This list of species and those included in the annexes II and IV of the Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) had only four species in common. The species selected by both approaches differed significantly in their traits considering their distribution and ecological specialization with the annexes of the EU Habitats Directive including many species that are neither range‐restricted nor have their core distribution within Europe, and furthermore many not threatened ecological generalists. Our results suggest that species prioritization for nature conservation should follow objective criteria, such as distribution and ecological specialization.
Animal Conservation – Wiley
Published: Feb 1, 2020
Keywords: ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.