Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(2007)
Assessment of the Harvest of Native Oysters (Ostrea angasi) from the Tasmanian Shellfish Fishery. Department of the Environment and Water Resources
P.C. Boxall, W.L. Adamowicz (2002)
Understanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: a latent class approachTransportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 23
R. Scarpa, J. Rose (2008)
Design Efficiency for Non-Market Valuation with Choice Modelling: How to Measure it, What to Report and WhyERN: Model Evaluation & Selection (Topic)
F. Carlsson, P. Martinsson (2003)
Design techniques for stated preference methods in health economics.Health economics, 12 4
R. Scarpa, S. Ferrini, K. Willis (2005)
Performance of Error Component Models for Status-Quo Effects in Choice Experiments
(2006)
Statistics -Tasmania
D. Hensher, W. Greene (2003)
The Mixed Logit model: The state of practiceTransportation, 30
(2006)
Indicators for the Condition of Estuaries and Coastal Waters
Z. Sándor, M. Wedel (2001)
Designing Conjoint Choice Experiments Using Managers' Prior BeliefsJournal of Marketing Research, 38
F. Rodríguez, F. Carlsson, P. Martinsson (2001)
Using Choice Experiments for Non-Market ValuationEconomic Issues Journal Articles, 8
E. Birol, K. Karousakis, P. Koundouri (2006)
Using a choice experiment to account for preference heterogeneity in wetland attributes: The case of Cheimaditida wetland in GreeceEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 60
W. Greene, D. Hensher, J. Rose (2006)
Accounting for heterogeneity in the variance of unobserved effects in mixed logit modelsTransportation Research Part B-methodological, 40
(2002)
George River Catchment: Plan for Rivercare Works for the Upper Catchment, North George and South George Rivers. George River Catchment Coordinator
E. Birol, K. Karousakis, P. Koundouri (2006)
Using a choice experiment to account for preference heterogeneity in wetland attributes: The case of Cheimaditida wetland in GreeceEcological Economics, 60
R. Espino, Juan Martín, C. Román (2008)
Analyzing the effect of preference heterogeneity on willingness to pay for improving service quality in an airline choice contextTransportation Research Part E-logistics and Transportation Review, 44
F. Carlsson, P. Martinsson (2003)
Design techniques for stated preference methods in health economicsResource and Energy Economics, 12
M. Czajkowski, N. Hanley (2009)
Using labels to investigate scope effects in stated preference methodsCoastal Management, 44
P. Boxall, W. Adamowicz (2002)
Understanding Heterogeneous Preferences in Random Utility Models: A Latent Class ApproachEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 23
(1999)
Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment
I.J. Bateman, R.T. Carson, B. Day, D. Dupont, J.J. Louviere, S. Morimoto, R. Scarpa, P. Wang (2008)
Choice Set Awareness and Ordering Effects in Discrete Choice ExperimentsEnvironmental and Resource Economics
J. Ladenburg, S. Olsen (2008)
Gender-specific starting point bias in choice experiments: Evidence from an empirical studyJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 56
N. Hanley, S. Colombo, D. Tinch, A. Black, Ashar Aftab (2006)
Estimating the benefits of water quality improvements under the Water Framework Directive: are benefits transferable?European Review of Agricultural Economics, 33
(2007)
Annual Waterways Monitoring Reports 2006: George Catchment, Department of Primary Industries
(2008)
State of the Region: Water Quality and Stream Condition in Northern Tasmania 2006
A. Cameron, P. Trivedi (2005)
Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications
F. Carlsson, P. Frykblom, Carolina Liljenstolpe (2003)
Valuing wetland attributes: an application of choice experimentsEcological Economics, 47
D. Campbell (2007)
Willingness to Pay for Rural Landscape Improvements: Combining Mixed Logit and Random-Effects ModelsJournal of Agricultural Economics, 58
R. Scarpa, T. Giudice (2011)
Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization Market Segmentation via Mixed Logit : Extra-Virgin Olive Oil in Urban Italy
David Revelt, K. Train (1998)
Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households' Choices of Appliance Efficiency LevelReview of Economics and Statistics, 80
(2000)
Estimating Community Values for Land and Water Degradation Impacts
Jeffrey Bennett, Rob Dumsday, Gary Howell, Chris Lloyd, Neil Sturgess, L. Raalte (2008)
The economic value of improved environmental health in Victorian riversAustralasian Journal of Environmental Management, 15
P. Scanes, G. Coade, M. Doherty, R. Hill (2007)
Evaluation of the utility of water quality based indicators of estuarine lagoon condition in NSW, AustraliaEstuarine Coastal and Shelf Science, 74
Mikołaj Czajkowski, N. Hanley (2009)
Using Labels to Investigate Scope Effects in Stated Preference MethodsEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 44
M. Kragt, J. Bennett (2008)
Developing a Questionnaire for Valuing Changes in Natural Resource Management in the George Catchment, TasmaniaThe research reports
(2003)
Draft Rivercare Plan Lower George River. Lower George Landcare Group
M. Kragt, J. Bennett (2009)
What'’s Appropriate? Investigating the Effects of Attribute Level Framing and Changing Cost Levels in Choice Experiments
M. Morrison, J. Bennett (2004)
Valuing New South Wales Rivers for Use in Benefit TransferWiley-Blackwell: Australian Journal of Agricultural & Resource Economics
M. Kragt, J. Bennett (2010)
The Impacts of Attribute Level Framing and Changing Cost Levels on Choice Experiments Value Estimates
J. Bennett, R. Blamey (2001)
The choice modelling approach to environmental valuation
M. Kragt, J. Bennett (2008)
Designing choice experiments to Test for Anchoring and Framing EffectsThe research reports
(2005)
Environmental Management Goals for Tasmanian Surface Waters
R. Johnston, T. Grigalunas, J. Opaluch, M. Mazzotta, Jerry Diamantedes (2002)
Valuing Estuarine Resource Services Using Economic and Ecological Models: The Peconic Estuary System StudyCoastal Management, 30
(2005)
Water Resources Policy, Generic Principles for Water Management Planning
D. Hensher, J. Rose, W. Greene (2005)
Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer
I. Bateman, R. Carson, B. Day, D. Dupont, J. Louviere, S. Morimoto, R. Scarpa, Paul Wang (2008)
Choice set awareness and ordering effects in discrete choice experiments in discrete choice experiments
K. Train (2000)
Halton Sequences for Mixed Logit
B. Álvarez-Farizo, N. Hanley, Ramón Barberán, Angelina Lázaro (2007)
Choice modeling at the "market stall": Individual versus collective interest in environmental valuationEcological Economics, 60
Gregory Poe, Michael Welsh, E. Lossin (1994)
Implementing the Convolutions Approach: A Companion to "Measuring the Difference (X-Y) of Simulated Distributions: A Convolutions Approach"
J. Bennett, R. Dumsday, G. Howell, C. Lloyd, N. Sturgess, L. van Raalte (2008)
The economic value of improved environmental health in Victorian riversEcological Economics, 15
R. Scarpa, K. Willis, M. Acutt (2007)
Valuing externalities from water supply: Status quo, choice complexity and individual random effects in panel kernel logit analysis of choice experimentsJournal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50
K. Lancaster (1966)
A New Approach to Consumer TheoryJournal of Political Economy, 74
D. Hensher, J. Rose, W. Greene (2005)
Applied Choice Analysis: List of tables
P. Davies, Jessemy Long, Michael Brown, Helen Dunn, Danielle Heffer, Rod, Knight (2005)
The Tasmanian Conservation of Freshwater Ecosystem Values (CFEV) framework: developing a conservation and management system for rivers., 1
(2009)
Environmental Valuation Reference Inventory
F. Alpízar, F. Carlsson, P. Martinsson (2001)
Using choice experiments for non‐market valuationAustralasian Journal of Environmental Management, 8
J. Windle, J. Rolfe (2004)
Assessing values for estuary protection with Choice Modelling using different payment mechanisms
Gregory Poe, Michael Welsh, P. Champ (1997)
Measuring the Difference in Mean Willingness to Pay When Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Responses Are Not IndependentLand Economics, 73
D. Rigby, M. Burton (2005)
Preference Heterogeneity and GM Food in the UKEuropean Review of Agricultural Economics, 32
K. Train (2003)
Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation by Kenneth E. Train
I. Krinsky, A. Robb (1986)
On Approximating the Statistical Properties of ElasticitiesThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 68
W. Greene, D. Hensher (2007)
Heteroscedastic control for random coefficients and error components in mixed logitTransportation Research Part E-logistics and Transportation Review, 43
D. Campbell, W. Hutchinson, R. Scarpa (2008)
Incorporating Discontinuous Preferences into the Analysis of Discrete Choice ExperimentsEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 41
(2007)
Georges Catchment and Estuary Project Overview
(2007)
Statistics – Tasmania, 2007Ecological Economics
(2007)
Break O'Day NRM Survey 2006 -Summary of Results
J. Louviere, D. Hensher, J. Swait (2000)
Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications
(2006)
Australian Census 2006
N. Hanley, W. Adamowicz, R. Wright (2005)
Price vector effects in choice experiments: an empirical testResource and Energy Economics, 27
Gregory Poe, Kelly Giraud, J. Loomis (2005)
Computational Methods for Measuring the Difference of Empirical DistributionsEconometric Modeling: Agriculture
F. Carlsson, P. Frykblom, C. Liljenstolpe (2003)
Valuing wetland attributes: an application of choice experimentsEuropean Review of Agricultural Economics, 47
C. Mckenny, C. Shepherd, Aquatic Ecologists (1999)
Ecological flow requirements for the George River
Choice experiments (CE) have become widespread as an approach to environmental valuation in both Australia and overseas. However, there are few valuation studies that have addressed natural resource management (NRM) changes in Tasmania. Furthermore, few studies have focussed on the estimation of estuary values. The CE study described in this paper aims to analyse community preferences for NRM options in the George catchment, Tasmania. Catchment health attributes were: the length of native riverside vegetation; the number of rare native animal and plant species in the George catchment; and area of healthy seagrass beds in the Georges Bay, which was used as a measure of estuary condition. Mixed logit models with interactions between socio‐economic variables and the choice attributes were estimated to account for systematic and random taste heterogeneity across respondents. Results reveal considerable variation in preferences towards the attributes and show that value estimates are significantly impacted by the way in which we account for preference heterogeneity. Preference heterogeneity thus needs to be considered when estimating community willingness‐to‐pay for environmental changes. This study further shows little responsiveness to the presented changes in estuary seagrass area.
The Australian Journal of Agricultural Resource Economics – Wiley
Published: Apr 1, 2011
Keywords: ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.