Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Kanbur, Hillel Rapoport (2005)
Migration selectivity and the evolution of spatial inequalityJournal of Economic Geography, 5
A. Venables (2003)
Spatial disparities in developing countries: cities, regions, and international tradeJournal of Economic Geography, 5
W. Frey, K. Liaw (2006)
Migration within the United States: Role of Race-EthnicityBrookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs, 2005
(2007)
The changing nature of wage inequality
K. Liaw, W. Frey (2007)
Multivariate explanation of the 1985–1990 and 1995–2000 destination choices of newly arrived immigrants in the United States: the beginning of a new trend?Population Space and Place, 13
W. Frey (2005)
Immigration and Domestic Migration in US Metro Areas: 2000 and 1990 Census Findings by Education and Race
J. Galbraith, J. Hale (2006)
American Inequality: From IT Bust to Big Government BoomThe Economists' Voice, 3
Christopher Henrie, D. Plane (2008)
Exodus from the California Core: Using Demographic Effectiveness and Migration Impact Measures to Examine Population Redistribution Within the Western United StatesPopulation Research and Policy Review, 27
(1991)
Increasing Returns and Economic Geography
Gary Burtless (2003)
Has Widening Inequality Promoted or Retarded US GrowthCanadian Public Policy-analyse De Politiques, 29
S. Gabriel, J. Shack-Marquez, W. Wascher (1993)
Does migration arbitrage regional labor market differentials?Regional science and urban economics, 23 2
Robert Walker, M. Ellis, R. Barff (1992)
Linked migration systems: immigration and internal labor flows in the United States.Economic geography, 68 3
Richard Wright, M. Ellis, M. Reibel (1997)
The linkage between immigration and internal migration in large metropolitan areas in the United States.Economic geography, 73 2
D. Plane, Jason Jurjevich (2009)
Ties That No Longer Bind? The Patterns and Repercussions of Age-Articulated MigrationThe Professional Geographer, 61
T. Piketty, Emmanuel Saez (2003)
Income inequality in the United States
S. Lee, C. Roseman (1999)
Migration Determinants and Employment Consequences of White and Black Families, 1985–1990*Economic Geography, 75
D. Plane (1999)
Geographical pattern analysis of income migration in the United States.International journal of population geography : IJPG, 5 3
D. Plane, Christopher Henrie, M. Perry (2005)
Migration up and down the urban hierarchy and across the life courseProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102
P. Pellegrini, S. Fotheringham (2002)
Modelling spatial choice: a review and synthesis in a migration contextProgress in Human Geography, 26
J. Chalmers, M. Greenwood (1985)
The regional labor market adjustment process: Determinants of changes in rates of labor force participation, unemployment, and migrationThe Annals of Regional Science, 19
Masahisa Fujita, P. Krugman, A. Venables (1999)
The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade, 1
K Newbold (1996)
Income, Self-Selection, and Return and Onward Interprovincial Migration in CanadaEnvironment and Planning A, 28
P. Boyle, T. Cooke, K. Halfacree, Darren Smith (2001)
A cross-national comparison of the impact of family migration on women’s employment statusDemography, 38
S. Withers (2004)
Center for Studies in Demography and Ecology Housing Costs and the Geography of Family Migration Outcomes
J. Shumway, Samuel Otterstrom (2001)
Spatial Patterns of Migration and Income Change in the Mountain West: The Dominance of Service-Based, Amenity-Rich CountiesThe Professional Geographer, 53
D. Plane, F. Heins (2003)
Age articulation of U.S. inter-metropolitan migration flowsThe Annals of Regional Science, 37
D. Ley, Judith Tutchener (2001)
Immigration, Globalisation and House Prices in Canada's Gateway CitiesHousing Studies, 16
K. Gotham (2006)
The Secondary Circuit of Capital Reconsidered: Globalization and the U.S. Real Estate Sector1American Journal of Sociology, 112
One of the most important concepts found in the migration literature is that it is a selective process, both in terms of who migrates and in the migrants' individual movement trajectories. The selectivity of migration means that the population structure at both origin and destination will change over time through migration, thus influencing the socio‐economic fabric of both sending and receiving regions. In this study we are primarily interested in the selectivity of migration relative to income and how migration affects the distribution of income across metropolitan areas in the U.S. We first cluster metropolitan areas by housing costs and then examine the flow of income migration relative to these costs using IRS county‐to‐county migration data for the years 1994/95 through 2003/04. Both total aggregate and per capita incomes by housing market clusters show some significant changes over the time frame used in this paper with moderate priced housing markets and non‐metropolitan areas the biggest gainers in aggregate income and some high priced housing markets and (once again) nonmetropolitan areas the biggest gainers in per capita income. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Population, Space and Place – Wiley
Published: Nov 1, 2010
Keywords: ; ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.