Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Erica Waal, A. Whiten (2012)
Spontaneous Emergence, Imitation and Spread of Alternative Foraging Techniques among Groups of Vervet MonkeysPLoS ONE, 7
C. Catmur, H. Gillmeister, G. Bird, Roman Liepelt, M. Brass, C. Heyes (2008)
Through the looking glass: counter‐mirror activation following incompatible sensorimotor learningEuropean Journal of Neuroscience, 28
A. Mckyton, I. Ben-Zion, E. Zohary (2018)
Lack of Automatic Imitation in Newly Sighted IndividualsPsychological Science, 29
Eóin O'Sullivan, Simone Berg, C. Caldwell (2018)
Automatic imitation effects are influenced by experience of synchronous action in children.Journal of experimental child psychology, 171
Esta Berg (1948)
A simple objective technique for measuring flexibility in thinking.The Journal of general psychology, 39
E. Bonté, Timothy Flemming, J. Fagot (2011)
Executive control of perceptual features and abstract relations by baboons (Papio papio)Behavioural Brain Research, 222
J. Fagot, D. Paleressompoulle (2009)
Automatic testing of cognitive performance in baboons maintained in social groupsBehavior Research Methods, 41
Doreen Thompson, J. Russell (2004)
The ghost condition: imitation versus emulation in young children's observational learning.Developmental psychology, 40 5
R. Rumiati, A. Tessari (2002)
Imitation of novel and well-known actionsExperimental Brain Research, 142
C. Catmur, R. Mars, M. Rushworth, C. Heyes (2011)
Making Mirrors: Premotor Cortex Stimulation Enhances Mirror and Counter-mirror Motor FacilitationJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23
Clare Press, H. Gillmeister, C. Heyes (2007)
Sensorimotor experience enhances automatic imitation of robotic actionProceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274
C. Tennie, J. Call, M. Tomasello (2006)
Push or Pull: Imitation vs. Emulation in Great Apes and Human ChildrenEthology, 112
Elizabeth Ray, C. Heyes (2011)
Imitation in infancy: the wealth of the stimulus.Developmental science, 14 1
H. Gillmeister, C. Catmur, Roman Liepelt, M. Brass, C. Heyes (2008)
Experience-based priming of body parts: A study of action imitationBrain Research, 1217
B. Stürmer, G. Aschersleben, W. Prinz (2000)
Correspondence effects with manual gestures and postures: a study of imitation.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 26 6
W. Prinz (1997)
Perception and Action PlanningEuropean Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9
D. Bates, M. Machler, B. Bolker, Steven Walker (2014)
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4Journal of Statistical Software, 67
Lydia Hopper (2010)
‘Ghost’ experiments and the dissection of social learning in humans and animalsBiological Reviews, 85
B. Bertenthal, M. Longo, Adam Kosobud (2006)
Imitative response tendencies following observation of intransitive actions.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 32 2
Francys Subiaul (2010)
Dissecting the imitation faculty: The multiple imitation mechanisms (MIM) hypothesisBehavioural Processes, 83
E. Otte, U. Habel, M. Schulte-Rüther, K. Konrad, I. Koch (2011)
Interference in simultaneously perceiving and producing facial expressions—Evidence from electromyographyNeuropsychologia, 49
Alison Wiggett, M. Hudson, S. Tipper, P. Downing (2011)
Learning associations between action and perception: Effects of incompatible training on body part and spatial primingBrain and Cognition, 76
C. Catmur, Vincent Walsh, C. Heyes (2009)
Associative sequence learning: the role of experience in the development of imitation and the mirror systemPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364
Martin Eimer (1995)
Stimulus-response compatibility and automatic response activation: evidence from psychophysiological studies.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 21 4
Sukhvinder Obhi, J. Hogeveen (2010)
Incidental action observation modulates muscle activityExperimental Brain Research, 203
Chi-Tai Huang, T. Charman (2005)
Gradations of emulation learning in infants' imitation of actions on objects.Journal of experimental child psychology, 92 3
Y. Blandin, L. Proteau (2000)
On the Cognitive Basis of Observational Learning: Development of Mechanisms for the Detection and Correction of ErrorsQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53
L. Aplin, D. Farine, J. Morand‐Ferron, A. Cockburn, Alex Thornton, B. Sheldon (2014)
Experimentally induced innovations lead to persistent culture via conformity in wild birdsNature, 518
Harriet Over, M. Carpenter (2012)
Putting the social into social learning: explaining both selectivity and fidelity in children's copying behavior.Journal of comparative psychology, 126 2
Francys Subiaul, J. Cantlon, R. Holloway,, H. Terrace (2004)
Cognitive Imitation in Rhesus MacaquesScience, 305
Eóin O'Sullivan, N. Claidière, C. Caldwell (2017)
Action-Matching Biases in Monkeys (Sapajus spp.) in a Stimulus–Response Compatibility Task: Evaluating Experience-Dependent MalleabilityJournal of Comparative Psychology, 131
M. Brass, S. Zysset, D. Cramon (2001)
The Inhibition of Imitative Response TendenciesNeuroImage, 14
Emiel Cracco, L. Bardi, Charlotte Desmet, O. Genschow, D. Rigoni, Lize Coster, Ina Radkova, Eliane Deschrijver, M. Brass (2018)
Automatic Imitation: A Meta-AnalysisPsychological Bulletin, 144
A. Meltzoff, M. Moore (1997)
Explaining Facial Imitation: A Theoretical Model.Early development & parenting, 6 3-4
R. Byrne (2002)
Imitation of novel complex actions: What does the evidence from animals mean?Advances in The Study of Behavior, 31
Clare Press, G. Bird, Rüdiger Flach, C. Heyes (2005)
Robotic movement elicits automatic imitation.Brain research. Cognitive brain research, 25 3
Emiel Cracco, Lize Coster, Michael Andres, M. Brass (2016)
Mirroring multiple agents: motor resonance during action observation is modulated by the number of agents.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 11 9
R. Mui, M. Haselgrove, J. Pearce, C. Heyes (2008)
Automatic imitation in budgerigarsProceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275
E. Renner, Donna Kean, M. Atkinson, C. Caldwell (2021)
The use of individual, social, and animated cue information by capuchin monkeys and children in a touchscreen taskScientific Reports, 11
F. Range, L. Huber, C. Heyes (2011)
Automatic imitation in dogsProceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278
R. Baayen (2008)
Analyzing linguistic data
P. Bergen, John Sutton (2018)
Sociocultural memory development research drives new directions in gadgetry scienceBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 42
C. Heyes, G. Bird, Helen Johnson, P. Haggard (2005)
Experience modulates automatic imitation.Brain research. Cognitive brain research, 22 2
A. Meltzoff, L. Murray, E. Simpson, M. Heimann, Emese Nagy, J. Nadel, Eric Pedersen, Rechele Brooks, D. Messinger, L. Pascalis, Francys Subiaul, A. Paukner, P. Ferrari (2018)
Re-examination of Oostenbroek et al. (2016): evidence for neonatal imitation of tongue protrusion.Developmental science, 21 4
Lorenzo Ferrucci, Simon Nougaret, E. Brunamonti, A. Genovesio (2019)
Effects of reward size and context on learning in macaque monkeysBehavioural brain research, 372
Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Role of the social actor during social interaction and learning in human-monkey paradigms
C. Heyes, Elizabeth Ray (2000)
What Is the Significance of Imitation in AnimalsAdvances in The Study of Behavior, 29
A. Meltzoff, M. Moore (1977)
Imitation of Facial and Manual Gestures by Human NeonatesScience, 198
Janine Oostenbroek, T. Suddendorf, Mark Nielsen, Jonathan Redshaw, Siobhan Kennedy-Costantini, Jacqueline Davis, Sally Clark, V. Slaughter (2016)
Comprehensive Longitudinal Study Challenges the Existence of Neonatal Imitation in HumansCurrent Biology, 26
J. Fischer, G. Kopp, Federica Pesco, A. Goffe, K. Hammerschmidt, Urs Kalbitzer, Matthias Klapproth, Peter Maciej, Ibrahima Ndao, Annika Patzelt, D. Zinner (2017)
Charting the neglected West: The social system of Guinea baboonsAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, 162
M. Brass, C. Heyes (2005)
Imitation: is cognitive neuroscience solving the correspondence problem?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9
Richard Ramsey (2018)
What are reaction time indices of automatic imitation measuring?Consciousness and Cognition, 65
L. Hopewell, L. Leaver, S. Lea, A. Wills (2010)
Grey squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis) show a feature-negative effect specific to social learningAnimal Cognition, 13
E. Renner, E. Patterson, Francys Subiaul (2020)
Specialization in the vicarious learning of novel arbitrary sequences in humans but not orangutansPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 375
C. Heyes (2011)
Automatic imitation.Psychological bulletin, 137 3
Emiel Cracco, M. Brass (2017)
Automatic Imitation of Multiple Agents: Simultaneous or Random Representation?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44
B. Voelkl, L. Huber (2000)
True imitation in marmosetsAnimal Behaviour, 60
Francys Subiaul (2016)
What’s Special about Human Imitation? A Comparison with Enculturated ApesBehavioral Sciences, 6
N. Bien, A. Roebroeck, R. Goebel, A. Sack (2008)
The brain's intention to imitate: The neurobiology of intentional versus automatic imitationBrain Stimulation, 1
What factors affect imitation performance? Varying theories of imitation stress the role of experience, but few studies have explicitly tested its role in imitative learning in non‐human primates. We tested several predictions regarding the role of experience, conspecific presence, and action compatibility using a stimulus–response compatibility protocol. Nineteen baboons separated into two experimental groups learned to respond by targeting on a touch screen the same stimulus as their neighbor (compatible) or the opposite stimulus (incompatible). They first performed the task with a conspecific demonstrator (social phase) and then a computer demonstrator (ghost phase). After reaching a predetermined success threshold, they were then tested in an opposite compatibility condition (i.e., reversal learning conditions). Seven baboons performed at least two reversals during the social phase, and we found no significant difference between the compatible and incompatible conditions, although we noticed slightly faster response times (RTs) in the compatible condition that disappeared after the first reversal. During the ghost phase, monkeys showed difficulties in learning the incompatible condition, and the compatible condition RTs tended to be slower than during the social phase. Together, these results suggest that (a) there is no strong movement compatibility effect in our task and that (b) the presence of a demonstrator plays a role in eliciting correct responses but is not essential as has been previously shown in human studies.
Cognitive Science - A Multidisciplinary Journal – Wiley
Published: Mar 1, 2022
Keywords: Automatic imitation; Social learning; Stimulus–response compatibility; Mirror neuron; Guinea baboon; Ghost demonstrator
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.