Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Sadeghi, A. Nemati, A. Ghavimi, M. Yari (2016)
Thermodynamic analysis and multi-objective optimization of various ORC (organic Rankine cycle) configurations using zeotropic mixturesEnergy, 109
R. Dipippo (2008)
Geothermal power plants : principles, applications, case studies and environmental impact
Sheng-jun Zhang, Huaixin Wang, G. Tao (2011)
Performance comparison and parametric optimization of subcritical Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) and transcritical power cycle system for low-temperature geothermal power generationApplied Energy, 88
G. Manente, A. Lazzaretto, Eleonora Bonamico (2017)
Design guidelines for the choice between single and dual pressure layouts in organic Rankine cycle (ORC) systemsEnergy, 123
P. Collings, Zhibin Yu, E. Wang (2016)
A dynamic organic Rankine cycle using a zeotropic mixture as the working fluid with composition tuning to match changing ambient conditionsApplied Energy, 171
(1962)
male, born in 1962 in Xi’an City
Kai-yong Hu, Jia-ling Zhu, Wei Zhang, Xinli Lu (2016)
A Selection Method for Power Generation Plants Used for Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS)Energies, 9
Jian Li, Z. Ge, Qiang Liu, Y. Duan, Zhen Yang (2018)
Thermo-economic performance analyses and comparison of two turbine layouts for organic Rankine cycles with dual-pressure evaporationEnergy Conversion and Management, 164
Shukun Wang, Chao Liu, Cheng Zhang, Xiaoxiao Xu, Qibin Li (2018)
Thermo-economic evaluations of dual pressure organic Rankine cycle (DPORC) driven by geothermal heat sourceJournal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy
Jianyong Wang, Jiangfeng Wang, Yiping Dai, Pan Zhao (2015)
Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of a flash-binary geothermal power generation systemGeothermics, 55
Renpeng Feng, Y. Zuo, Meihua Yang, Jiong Zhang, Z. Liu, Yong-shui Zhou, Qingqing Hao (2019)
Present Terrestrial Heat Flow Measurements of the Geothermal Fields in the Chagan Sag of the Yingen‐Ejinaqi Basin, Inner Mongolia, ChinaActa Geologica Sinica ‐ English Edition, 93
Y. Duan (2018)
Parametric Optimization And Thermodynamic Performance Comparison Of Single-Pressure And Dual-Pressure Evaporation Organic Rankine Cycles
Chaoshui Xu, P. Dowd, Z. Tian (2015)
A simplified coupled hydro-thermal model for enhanced geothermal systemsApplied Energy, 140
Jiaxi Xia, Jiangfeng Wang, Gang Zhang, Juwei Lou, Pan Zhao, Yiping Dai (2018)
Thermo-economic analysis and comparative study of transcritical power cycles using CO2-based mixtures as working fluidsApplied Thermal Engineering
Redakcija časopisa (2019)
Chemical Engineering Plant Cost Index, 31
Xinli Lu, Zhao Yangyang, Jia-ling Zhu, Wei Zhang (2018)
Optimization and applicability of compound power cycles for enhanced geothermal systemsApplied Energy
Jiangfeng Wang, Jianyong Wang, Pan Zhao, Yiping Dai (2016)
Thermodynamic analysis of a new combined cooling and power system using ammonia–water mixtureEnergy Conversion and Management, 117
Yajing Zhao, Jiangfeng Wang (2016)
Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a flash-binary geothermal power systemApplied Energy, 179
Tai-lu Li, Xiaoxia Hu, Jianqiang Wang, Xiang-fei Kong, Jian Liu, Jia-ling Zhu (2018)
Performance improvement of two-stage serial organic Rankine cycle (TSORC) driven by dual-level heat sources of geothermal energy coupled with solar energyGeothermics
Z. Guzović, Predrag Raskovic, Zoran Blatarić (2014)
The comparision of a basic and a dual-pressure ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle): Geothermal Power Plant Velika Ciglena case studyEnergy, 76
A. Mosaffa, N. Mokarram, L. Farshi (2017)
Thermo-economic analysis of combined different ORCs geothermal power plants and LNG cold energyGeothermics, 65
P. Olasolo, M. Juárez, M. Morales, Sebastiano D´Amico, I. Liarte (2016)
Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS): A reviewRenewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 56
Mingtao Wang, Yi-guang Chen, Qiyi Liu, Z. Yuanyuan (2018)
Thermodynamic and thermo-economic analysis of dual-pressure and single pressure evaporation organic Rankine cyclesEnergy Conversion and Management
Yang Du, Yi Yang, Dongshuai Hu, Muting Hao, Jiangfeng Wang, Yiping Dai (2018)
Off-design performance comparative analysis between basic and parallel dual-pressure organic Rankine cycles using radial inflow turbinesApplied Thermal Engineering
N. Jin, Xu Tianfu, Wang Fugang, Feng Bo, Bao Xinhua (2013)
Effectiveness of Using CO 2 as a Stimulation Agent for Enhanced Geothermal Systems ( EGS )
Arnaud Landelle, N. Tauveron, R. Revellin, P. Haberschill, S. Colasson (2017)
Experimental Investigation of a Transcritical Organic Rankine Cycle with Scroll Expander for Low—Temperature Waste Heat RecoveryEnergy Procedia, 129
Z. Ge, Jian Li, Qiang Liu, Y. Duan, Zhen Yang (2018)
Thermodynamic analysis of dual-loop organic Rankine cycle using zeotropic mixtures for internal combustion engine waste heat recoveryEnergy Conversion and Management
Bing Liu, Hui Zhao, He-ling Jin, Fahu Chen (2020)
Holocene Moisture Variation Recorded by Aeolian Sand‐Palaeosol Sequences of the Gonghe Basin, Northeastern Qinghai‐Tibetan Plateau, ChinaActa Geologica Sinica ‐ English Edition, 94
R. DiPippo, G. Smaldon (2012)
Geothermal Power Plants: Principles, Applications, Case Studies and Environmental Impact (Third Edition). Chapter 22 in Enhanced Geothermal Systems-projects and Plants
Zhixue Sun, X. Zhang, X. Yi, Jun Yao, Haoxuan Wang, S. Lv, Zhilei Sun, H. Yong, Mingyu Cai, Xiaoxue Huang (2017)
Numerical simulation of the heat extraction in EGS with thermal-hydraulic-mechanical coupling method based on discrete fractures modelEnergy, 120
Qiang Liu, Aijing Shen, Y. Duan (2015)
Parametric optimization and performance analyses of geothermal organic Rankine cycles using R600a/R601a mixtures as working fluidsApplied Energy, 148
Sandip Chhetri, R. Chicchi, Andrew Osborn (2013)
Experimental investigation
T. Adorno, R. Alexy, Juri Andruchowytsch, Friedrich Ani, Ingeborg Bachmann, Zsófia Bán, Polina Barskova, P. Basil, W. Bauer, U. Beck, Zoë Beck, Jurek Becker, J. Becker, Ulla Berkéwicz, T. Bernhard, Barbara Beuys, Marcel Beyer, Peter Bichsel, Ernst Bloch, Rainer Forst, Manfred Frank, G. Frankenberg, Max Frisch, V. Fritsch, Markus Gabriel, Gunther Geltinger, Andrej Georgi, Dagmar Gersdorff, Rainald Goetz, Johannes Groschupf, Durs Grünbein, H. Gumbrecht (2016)
for Selection
Jian Li, Qiang Liu, Z. Ge, Y. Duan, Zhen Yang (2017)
Thermodynamic performance analyses and optimization of subcritical and transcritical organic Rankine cycles using R1234ze(E) for 100–200 °C heat sourcesEnergy Conversion and Management, 149
Naser Shokati, F. Ranjbar, M. Yari (2015)
Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of basic, dual-pressure and dual-fluid ORCs and Kalina geothermal power plants: A comparative studyRenewable Energy, 83
Zhenhua Kang, Jia-ling Zhu, Xinli Lu, Tai-lu Li, Xiujie Wu (2015)
Parametric optimization and performance analysis of zeotropic mixtures for an organic Rankine cycle driven by low-medium temperature geothermal fluidsApplied Thermal Engineering, 89
S. Karimi, Sima Mansouri (2018)
A comparative profitability study of geothermal electricity production in developed and developing countries: Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of different ORC configurationsRenewable Energy, 115
S. Lecompte, S. Lemmens, A. Verbruggen, M. Broek, M. Paepe (2014)
Thermo-economic comparison of advanced organic rankine cyclesEnergy Procedia, 61
A. Hussain, Syed Arif, Muhammad Aslam (2017)
Emerging renewable and sustainable energy technologies: State of the artRenewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 71
E. Elíasson, S. Thórhallsson, B. Steingrimsson (2014)
GEOTHERMAL POWER PLANTS
Investigation of a triple‐pressure organic Rankine cycle (TPORC) using geothermal energy for power generation with the net power output of the TPORC analyzed by varying the evaporation pressures, pinch temperature differences (tpp) and degrees of superheat (tsup) aimed to find the optimum operation conditions of the system. The thermodynamic performance of the TPORC was compared with a dual‐pressure organic Rankine cycle (DPORC) and a single‐pressure ORC (SPORC) for geofluid temperatures ranging from 100°C to 200°C, with particular reference to the utilization of a hot dry rock (HDR) geothermal resource. Thermodynamic performances of the TPORC system using eight different organic working fluids have also been investigated in terms of the net power outputs. Results show that a higher geofluid mass flow rate can make a considerable contribution to shortening the payback period (PBP) as well as to decreasing the levelized electricity cost (LEC), especially when the geofluid temperature is low. For the temperature range investigated, the order from high to low based on thermodynamic and techno‐economic performances is found to be TPORC > DPORC > SPORC. In terms of using geothermal resources within the given temperatures range (100°C–200°C), the TPORC system can be a better choice for geothermal power generation so long as the wellhead geofluid temperature is between 140°C and 180°C.
Acta Geologica Sinica (English Edition) – Wiley
Published: Dec 1, 2021
Keywords: geothermal energy; techno‐economics; power generation systems; triple‐pressure organic Rankine cycle (TPORC); thermodynamic performance
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.