Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
E. Anthony, M. Samples, Dylan Kervor, S. Ituarte, Christopher Lee, M. Austin (2010)
Coming back home: The reintegration of formerly incarcerated youth with service implicationsChildren and Youth Services Review, 32
Susan McCarter (2016)
Holistic Representation: A Randomized Pilot Study of Wraparound Services for First‐Time Juvenile Offenders to Improve Functioning, Decrease Motions for Review, and Lower RecidivismFamily Court Review, 54
L. Bromfield (2010)
Issues for the safety and wellbeing of children in families with multiple and complex problems: the co-occurrence of domestic violence, parental substance misuse, and mental health problems
Tina Maschi, S. Hatcher, C. Schwalbe, N. Rosato (2008)
Mapping the social service pathways of youth to and through the juvenile justice system: A comprehensive reviewChildren and Youth Services Review, 30
M. Pullmann, J. Kerbs, N. Koroloff, Ernie Veach-White, Rita Gaylor, Dede Sieler (2006)
Juvenile Offenders With Mental Health Needs: Reducing Recidivism Using WraparoundCrime & Delinquency, 52
Kelly Graves, James Frabutt, T. Shelton (2007)
Factors Associated With Mental Health and Juvenile Justice Involvement Among Children With Severe Emotional DisturbanceYouth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 5
Emmeline Chuang, R. Wells (2010)
The role of interagency collaboration in facilitating receipt of behavioral health services for youth involved with child welfare and juvenile justice.Children and youth services review, 32 12
Rosalyn Bertram, J. Suter, E. Bruns, Koren O’Rourke (2011)
Implementation Research and Wraparound Literature: Building a Research AgendaJournal of Child and Family Studies, 20
J. Howell, M. Kelly, James Palmer, Ronald Mangum (2004)
Integrating child welfare, juvenile justice, and other agencies in a continuum of services.Child welfare, 83 2
R. Homel, K. Freiberg, Sara Branch (2015)
CREATE-ing capacity to take developmental crime prevention to scale: A community-based approach within a national frameworkAustralian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 48
Sara Goodkind, Jeffrey Shook, Kevin Kim, R. Pohlig, D. Herring (2013)
From Child Welfare to Juvenile JusticeYouth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 11
E. Wright, Ryan Spohn, Joselyne Chenane, Nick Juliano (2017)
The Importance of Interagency Collaboration for Crossover YouthYouth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 15
(2008)
Pathways to detention in South Georgia: perceptions about the avenues to commitment, alternatives to detention, prevention, and gaps in resources
W. Haight, Laurel Bidwell, J. Marshall, Parmananda Khatiwoda (2014)
Implementing the Crossover Youth Practice Model in diverse contexts: child welfare and juvenile justice professionals' experiences of multisystem collaborationsChildren and Youth Services Review, 39
Maree Heffernan, C. Hall, A. Ingamells, W. Delaforce, B. Rich, N. Buys (2005)
Mapping Youth-At-Risk: GIS and its Potential as a Service Integration Tool
M. Halsey (2006)
Negotiating conditional releasePunishment & Society, 8
Catia Malvaso, P. Delfabbro, A. Day (2017)
The child protection and juvenile justice nexus in Australia: A longitudinal examination of the relationship between maltreatment and offending.Child abuse & neglect, 64
Michelle Carney, F. Buttell (2003)
Reducing Juvenile Recidivism: Evaluating the Wraparound Services ModelResearch on Social Work Practice, 13
Philip Mendes, Susan Baidawi (2012)
Pathways Into Youth Justice: Strengthening Policy and Program Supports for Young People in the Youth Justice System Who Are Transitioning From Out-of-Home CareChildren Australia, 37
Kelly Richards (2011)
What makes juvenile offenders different from adult offendersTrends and issues in crime and criminal justice
L. Dowse, E. Baldry, P. Snoyman (2009)
Disabling criminology: conceptualising the intersections of critical disability studies and critical criminology for people with mental health and cognitive disabilities in the criminal justice systemAustralian Journal of Human Rights, 15
M. McDonald, K. Rosier (2011)
Part A: What is it, what does it look like, when is it needed and what supports it?
Current policies suggest that collaborative approaches are core to working effectively with juvenile justice involved young people. However, there is little research examining the workings of multi‐agency and collaborative endeavours in this field, or the experiences of the human service workers facilitating these connections. This paper reports on qualitative research that resulted from the Juvenile Justice and Education Equity in the Hunter Region project. Thirty‐eight human service workers were interviewed about their perceptions of the workings, strengths and challenges of the service system that supports young people who come into contact with the Children's Court in the Lower and Upper Hunter regions of New South Wales. Data analysis revealed three key themes related to (1) service gaps, cycles and maelstrom; (2) pursuing authentic service engagement; and (3) insider–outsider dynamics in service provision. Findings are discussed in relation to emerging practice and research agendas.
Australian Journal of Social Issues – Wiley
Published: Sep 1, 2019
Keywords: ; ; ; ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.