Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Goodwin, Teck Yeo (2001)
Two factors affecting internal audit independence and objectivity: Evidence from SingaporeInternational Journal of Auditing, 5
K. Raghunandan, D. Rama, W. Read (2001)
Audit Committee Composition, “Gray Directors,” and Interaction with Internal AuditingAccounting Horizons, 15
Scarbrough Scarbrough, Rama Rama, Raghunandan Raghunandan (1998)
‘Audit committee composition and interaction with internal auditing: Canadian evidenceAccounting Horizons, 12
M. Bale, T. Dale (1998)
Public sector reform in New Zealand and its relevance to developing countriesWorld Bank Research Observer, 13
Lawrence Abbott, Susan Parker, Gary Peters (2002)
Audit Committee Characteristics and Financial Misstatement: A Study of the Efficacy of Certain Blue Ribbon Committee Recommendations
Lawrence Abbott, Susan Parker (2000)
Auditor Selection and Audit Committee CharacteristicsEar and Hearing, 19
Carcello Carcello, Hermanson Hermanson, Neal Neal, Riley Riley (2002)
‘Board characteristics and audit feesContemporary Accounting Research, 19
Allen Schick (1998)
Why Most Developing Countries Should Not Try New Zealand's ReformsWorld Bank Research Observer, 13
Joseph Carcello, D. Hermanson, T. Neal, Richard Riley (2000)
Board Characteristics and Audit FeesSEIN Corporate Governance & Accountability eJournal
W. G. III Bishop, Lapides Lapides, Rittenberg Rittenberg (2000)
‘The year of the audit committeeInternal Auditor, 57
McElveen McElveen (2002)
‘New rules, new challengesInternal Auditor, 6
Krishnamoorthy Krishnamoorthy, Wright Wright, Cohen Cohen (2002)
‘Auditors’ views on audit committees and financial reporting qualityCPA Journal, 72
This study examines the separate influence of independence and financial experience on audit committee relations with the internal audit function. Using data from Australia and New Zealand, the study focuses on audit committees and internal audit in both private and public sector entities. Data were collected by means of a questionnaire sent to chief internal auditors. The results suggest that independence and accounting experience have a complementary impact on audit committee relations with internal audit. Independence is more associated with issues of process while accounting experience is associated with the extent that the audit committee reviews the work of the internal audit function. There are also some differences based on country and sector. Overall, the findings have important implications for regulators in light of recent calls for audit committee members to have accounting expertise in addition to being independent.
International Journal of Auditing – Wiley
Published: Nov 1, 2003
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.