Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Quero, J. Bau, Á. Guerrero, M. Breuer, A. Loof, H. Kontzog, F. Camps (2003)
Sex pheromone of the oak processionary moth Thaumetopoea processionea. Identification and biological activity.Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 51 10
(1987)
Monitoring pine beauty moth by means of pheromone traps : the effect of moth dispersal
(2002)
Eradication. Invasive Arthropods in Agriculture: Problems and Solutions (ed
R. Baker, D. Caffier, J. Choiseul, P. Clercq, E. Dormannsne-Simon, B. Gerowitt, O. Karadjova, G. Lövei, A. Lansink, D. Makowski, C. Manceau, L. Manici, D. Perdikis, A. Puglia, J. Schans, G. Schrader, R. Steffek, A. Strömberg, K. Tiilikkala, J. Lanteren, I. Vloutoglou (2009)
Evaluation of a pest risk analysis on Thaumetopoea processionea L., the oak processionary moth, prepared by the UK and extension of its scope to the EU territoryEFSA Journal, 7
Met Office Integrated Data Archive System (MIDAS) Land and Marine Surface Stations Data (1853-current)
David Williams, N. Straw, M. Townsend, A. Wilkinson, A. Mullins (2013)
Monitoring oak processionary moth Thaumetopoea processionea L. using pheromone traps: the influence of pheromone lure source, trap design and height above the ground on capture ratesAgricultural and Forest Entomology, 15
Harald Maier, W. Spiegel, T. Kinaciyan, H. Krehan, A. Cabaj, Axel Schopf, Herbert Hönigsmann (2003)
The oak processionary caterpillar as the cause of an epidemic airborne disease: survey and analysisBritish Journal of Dermatology, 149
P. Howse, I. Stevens, C. Jones (1997)
Insect Pheromones and their Use in Pest Management
A. Battisti, A Battisti, M. Avci, D.N. Avtzis, M.L. Ben Jamaa, L. Berardi, W. Berretima, M. Branco, G. Chakali, M.A. El Alaoui El Fels, B. Frórot, J.A. Hódar, I. Mălăncus, K. Ipekdal, S. Larsson, T. Manole, Z. Mendel, N. Meurisse, P. Mirchev, N. Nemer, M‐R. Paiva, J. Pino, A. Protasov, N. Rahim, J. Rousselet, H. Santos, D. Sauvard, A. Schopf, M. Simonato, A. Yart, M. I. Zamoum (2015)
Processionary Moths and Climate Change: An Update
H. Jactel, G. Birgersson, S. Andersson, F. Schlyter (2011)
Non-host volatiles mediate associational resistance to the pine processionary mothOecologia, 166
H. Jactel, P. Menassieu, F. Vétillard, B. Barthélémy, D. Piou, B. Frérot, J. Rousselet, F. Goussard, M. Branco, A. Battisti (2006)
Population monitoring of the pine processionary moth (Lepidoptera: Thaumetopoeidae) with pheromone-baited trapsForest Ecology and Management, 235
I. Tomlinson, C. Potter, Helen Bayliss (2015)
Managing tree pests and diseases in urban settings: the case of Oak Processionary Moth in London, 2006-2012Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14
R. Fisher, D. Binkley (2012)
Influence of Tree Species
H. Jans, A. Franssen (2008)
[The urticating hairs of the oak processionary caterpillar (Thaumetopoea processionea L.), a possible problem for animals?].Tijdschrift voor diergeneeskunde, 133 10
(2014)
Der Eichenprozessionsspinner in Deutschland. Historie -Biologie -Gefrahen -Bekämpfung
A. Battisti, M. Avcı, D. Avtzis, M. Jamâa, L. Berardi, Wahiba Berretima, M. Branco, G. Chakali, M. Fels, B. Frérot, J. Hódar, I. Ionescu-Mălăncuş, K. İpekdal, S. Larsson, T. Manole, Z. Mendel, N. Meurisse, P. Mirchev, N. Nemer, M. Paiva, J. Pino, A. Protasov, N. Rahim, J. Rousselet, H. Santos, D. Sauvard, A. Schopf, M. Simonato, A. Yart, M. Zamoum (2015)
Natural History of the Processionary Moths (Thaumetopoea spp.): New Insights in Relation to Climate Change
F. Thomas, R. Blank, G. Hartmann (2002)
Abiotic and biotic factors and their interactions as causes of oak decline in Central EuropeForest Pathology, 32
C. Bonsignore, F. Manti (2013)
Influence of habitat and climate on the capture of male pine processionary mothsBulletin of Insectology, 66
(2013)
Monitoring the oak processionary moth with pheromone traps. Forestry Commission Practice Note FCPN020
H. Stigter (1997)
THAUMETOPOEA PROCESSIONEA IN THE NETHERLANDS: PRESENT STATUS AND MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES (LEPIDOPTERA: NOTODONTIDAE)
(2019)
Oak Processionary Moth Operational Report 2018
J. Myers (2002)
Eradication: Is It Ecologically, Financially, Environmentally, and Realistically Possible?
M. Mindlin, O. Waroux, S. Case, B. Walsh (2012)
The arrival of oak processionary moth, a novel cause of itchy dermatitis, in the UK: experience, lessons and recommendations.Public health, 126 9
David Williams, Gillian Jonusas (2018)
The influence of tree species and edge effects on pheromone trap catches of oak processionary moth Thaumetopoea processionea (L.) in the U.K.Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 21
D.A. Barbour (1987)
Population Biology and Control of the Pine Beauty Moth
R. Team (2014)
R: A language and environment for statistical computing.MSOR connections, 1
P. Witzgall, P. Kirsch, A. Cork (2010)
Sex Pheromones and Their Impact on Pest ManagementJournal of Chemical Ecology, 36
P. Morewood, G. Gries, J. Líška, P. Kapitola, D. Häussler, K. Möller, H. Bogenschütz (2000)
Towards pheromone‐based monitoring of nun moth, Lymantria monacha (L.) (Lep., Lymantriidae) populationsJournal of Applied Entomology, 124
(2013)
Introduction to GenStat for Windows, 16th edn. VSN International, U.K
P. Tobin, Laura Blackburn (2007)
Slow the spread: a national program to manage the gypsy moth., 6
S. Dresner, K. Mcgeevor, J. Tomei (2007)
Public Understanding Synthesis Report: a report to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Oak processionary moth (OPM) was introduced into the U.K. in 2004–2005 and pheromone traps have been used to monitor its spread and provide an early warning of the colonization of new areas. The traps capture adult male OPM, although catches are highly variable and it has proved difficult to establish a relationship between the numbers of males caught and local population densities. Surveys carried out around 260 pheromone traps as part of the U.K. OPM control programme, however, reveal a consistent linear relationship between square‐root transformed adult males per trap and cube‐root (or log10) transformed numbers of larval nests (r2 = 0.47; P < 0.001) In 91% of cases where traps captured no adult males, there were no OPM nests within 250 m and, where nests were present, the numbers of nests were low. Traps that captured more than 10–20 males were associated with counts of ≥ 50 larval nests. Defoliation and risks to human health from OPM are more closely related to nest density (i.e. the numbers of nests per tree). Consequently, identifying trap catches that might initiate a management response also requires information on the number of oak trees in the surrounding area.
Agricultural and Forest Entomology – Wiley
Published: Nov 1, 2019
Keywords: ; ; ; ; ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.