Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The past, present and future of population geography: reflections on Glenn Trewartha's address fifty years on

The past, present and future of population geography: reflections on Glenn Trewartha's address... On re‐reading Trewartha's address 50 years after it was written, I am prompted to reflect on both the historical and geographical situatedness of his conception of a disciplinary space for population geography, as well as on my own concerns about population geography in the early twenty‐first century. Trewartha's case for population geography, I suggest, reveals its cultural embeddedness within American geography of that time. However, it remains of more than historical interest since a similar case has yet to be articulated by the present generation of Anglo‐American population geographers. I argue that, despite evident successes, population geography is currently facing two problems relating to its identity. The first arises from its marginalised position within human geography; and the second is associated with what might be called an ‘imbalance’ in the subject matter of research, where migration studies have become increasingly dominant. Both problems raise questions about the geographical credentials of population geography, and I ask what the future research agenda should be. New research frontiers appear to be re‐mapping the spaces of knowledge in ways that could produce new configurations of the academy. In this context, the future of population geography seems uncertain. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Population, Space and Place Wiley

The past, present and future of population geography: reflections on Glenn Trewartha's address fifty years on

Population, Space and Place , Volume 10 (4) – Jul 1, 2004

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/the-past-present-and-future-of-population-geography-reflections-on-YAZbByAAK3

References (30)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
ISSN
1544-8444
eISSN
1544-8452
DOI
10.1002/psp.331
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

On re‐reading Trewartha's address 50 years after it was written, I am prompted to reflect on both the historical and geographical situatedness of his conception of a disciplinary space for population geography, as well as on my own concerns about population geography in the early twenty‐first century. Trewartha's case for population geography, I suggest, reveals its cultural embeddedness within American geography of that time. However, it remains of more than historical interest since a similar case has yet to be articulated by the present generation of Anglo‐American population geographers. I argue that, despite evident successes, population geography is currently facing two problems relating to its identity. The first arises from its marginalised position within human geography; and the second is associated with what might be called an ‘imbalance’ in the subject matter of research, where migration studies have become increasingly dominant. Both problems raise questions about the geographical credentials of population geography, and I ask what the future research agenda should be. New research frontiers appear to be re‐mapping the spaces of knowledge in ways that could produce new configurations of the academy. In this context, the future of population geography seems uncertain. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Journal

Population, Space and PlaceWiley

Published: Jul 1, 2004

Keywords: ; ; ; ;

There are no references for this article.