Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Parker Parker (2002c)
Accountants split over reformsFinancial Times
G. Whittington (1993)
Corporate Governance and the Regulation of Financial ReportingAccounting and Business Research, 23
Parker Parker (2002a)
Taxpayer will not fund accountancy watchdogFinancial Times
Acher Acher (2000)
Professionals serve the publicAccountancy
Lyall Lyall, Perks Perks (1976)
Create a State Auditing Board?– YesAccountancy
Management Accounting
Parker Parker (2002b)
Accountants attacked over attempts to block reformFinancial Times
Bruce Bruce (2001)
Co‐operative spirit enjoys the OFT's stamp of approvalThe Times
Hatherly Hatherly (1989)
Mega‐firm mergers – can we Offaud themAccountancy
Jenkins Jenkins (2002)
Confidence ActFinancial Times
Sharman Sharman (2002)
Profession is complacentAccountancy Age
Ian Dewing, Peter Russell (2000)
CADBURY AND BEYOND: PERCEPTIONS ON ESTABLISHING A PERMANENT BODY FOR CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REGULATIONBritish Accounting Review, 32
D. Hatherly, J. Innes, T. Brown (1991)
The Expanded Audit Report—An Empirical InvestigationAccounting and Business Research, 21
Eaglesham Eaglesham, Parker Parker (2002)
Big Four may face watchdogsFinancial Times
Murphy Murphy (1991)
Time to rebuild the audit foundationsAccountancy
This paper considers the new system of regulation of the accountancy profession in the UK, based on the Accountancy Foundation. It explores how the system compares with: principles of regulation produced by the Better Regulation Task Force and National Consumer Council; stakeholder perceptions on the nature of an independent regulatory body for UK listed company audit; new and emerging developments arising from the review of competition in professions by the Office of Fair Trading; recommendations of the Company Law Review Steering Group and establishment of the Financial Services Authority; and, events set in train in the UK as a result of the collapse of Enron in the US. The paper concludes it is ironic that the new system, enthusiastically endorsed so recently by government, should be called into question so fundamentally, and so rapidly, by events outside its jurisdiction.
International Journal of Auditing – Wiley
Published: Nov 1, 2002
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.