Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Grainger, A. Rey, S. Dufau (2008)
Letter perception: from pixels to pandemoniumTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 12
T. Jordan, Sharon Thomas, G. Patching, K. Scott-Brown (2003)
Assessing the importance of letter pairs in initial, exterior, and interior positions in reading.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 29 5
S. Dehaene (2013)
The Massive Impact of Literacy on the Brain and its Consequences for Education
Kazuko Takano, Mitsuhiro Ito, K. Kobayashi, Natsumi Sonobe, Sadatoshi Kurosu, Yukiko Mori, S. Takeuchi, M. Uchiyama, M. Kanno, S. Niwa (2002)
Procedural memory in schizophrenia assessed using a mirror reading taskPsychiatry Research, 109
R. Rudel, H. Teuber (1963)
DISCRIMINATION OF DIRECTION OF LINE IN CHILDREN.Journal of comparative and physiological psychology, 56
R. Ilg, A. Wohlschläger, Christian Gaser, Yasmin Liebau, Ruth Dauner, A. Wöller, C. Zimmer, J. Zihl, M. Mühlau (2008)
Gray Matter Increase Induced by Practice Correlates with Task-Specific Activation: A Combined Functional and Morphometric Magnetic Resonance Imaging StudyThe Journal of Neuroscience, 28
T. Lachmann, C. Leeuwen (2007)
Paradoxical Enhancement of Letter Recognition in Developmental DyslexiaDevelopmental Neuropsychology, 31
M. Carreiras, J. Duñabeitia, Manuel Perea (2007)
READING WORDS, NUMB3R5 and $YMßOL$Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11
J. Adelman (2011)
Letters in time and retinotopic space.Psychological review, 118 4
Irina Sekerina, P. Brooks (2007)
Eye movements during spoken word recognition in Russian children.Journal of experimental child psychology, 98 1
Bruce McCandliss, L. Cohen, S. Dehaene (2003)
The visual word form area: expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrusTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 7
J. Duñabeitia, Alberto Avilés, O. Afonso, Christoph Scheepers, M. Carreiras (2009)
Qualitative differences in the representation of abstract versus concrete words: Evidence from the visual-world paradigmCognition, 110
D. Fiset, C. Blais, Catherine Éthier-Majcher, M. Arguin, D. Bub, F. Gosselin (2008)
Features for Identification of Uppercase and Lowercase LettersPsychological Science, 19
Manuel Perea, S. Lupker (2004)
Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions ☆Journal of Memory and Language, 51
Christoph Scheepers, Frank Keller, Mirella Lapata (2008)
Evidence for serial coercion: A time course analysis using the visual-world paradigmCognitive Psychology, 56
Jordan Jordan, Thomas Thomas, Patching Patching, Scott‐Brown Scott‐Brown (2003)
Assessing the importance of letter Pairs in initial, exterior, and interior positions in reading. A reply to InhoffJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29
Y. Benjamini (2010)
Discovering the false discovery rateJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 72
D. Fiset, C. Blais, Catherine Éthier-Majcher, M. Arguin, D. Bub, F. Gosselin (2008)
Features for uppercase and lowercase letter identification
J. Grainger (2008)
Cracking the orthographic code: An introductionLanguage and Cognitive Processes, 23
U. Maurer, Bruce McCandliss (2007)
The development of visual expertise for words: The contribution of electrophysiology
J. Bowers, G. Vigliocco, Richard Haan (1998)
Orthographic, phonological, and articulatory contributions to masked letter and word priming.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 24 6
F. Huettig, Joost Rommers, A. Meyer (2011)
Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: a review and critical evaluation.Acta psychologica, 137 2
T. Lachmann, T. Geyer (2003)
Letter Reversals in Dyslexia: Is the Case Really Closed? A Critical Review and ConclusionsPsychology Science, 45
Régine Kolinsky, Arlette Verhaeghe, Tânia Fernandes, Elias Mengarda, Loni Grimm-Cabral, J. Morais (2011)
Enantiomorphy through the looking glass: literacy effects on mirror-image discrimination.Journal of experimental psychology. General, 140 2
Coltheart Coltheart, Rastle Rastle, Perry Perry, Langdon Langdon, Ziegler Ziegler (2001)
The DRC model: A model of visual word recognition and reading aloudPsychological Review, 108
Manuel Perea, C. Moret-Tatay, Victoria Panadero (2011)
Suppression of mirror generalization for reversible letters: Evidence from masked primingJournal of Memory and Language, 65
(2000)
Evaluación de los Procesos Lectores (PROLEC). Madrid: TEA
M. Coltheart, K. Rastle, C. Perry, R. Langdon, J. Ziegler (2001)
DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.Psychological review, 108 1
F. Vega, B. Rodríguez, Elvira Hernández (1996)
PROLEC: batería de evaluación de los procesos lectores de los niños de Educación Primaria
F. Cuetos (1989)
Lectura y escritura de palabras a través de la ruta fonologicaInfancia Y Aprendizaje, 12
C. Davis, Manuel Perea (2005)
BuscaPalabras: A program for deriving orthographic and phonological neighborhood statistics and other psycholinguistic indices in SpanishBehavior Research Methods, 37
J. Duñabeitia, M. Carreiras (2011)
The relative position priming effect depends on whether letters are vowels or consonants.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 37 5
Megan Terepocki, Richard Kruk, D. Willows (2002)
The Incidence and Nature of Letter Orientation Errors in Reading DisabilityJournal of Learning Disabilities, 35
F. Huettig, G. Altmann (2005)
Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigmCognition, 96
F. Pegado, Kimihiro Nakamura, L. Cohen, S. Dehaene (2011)
Breaking the symmetry: Mirror discrimination for single letters but not for pictures in the Visual Word Form AreaNeuroImage, 55
B. Schlaggar, Bruce McCandliss (2007)
Development of neural systems for reading.Annual review of neuroscience, 30
K. Rayner, Sarah White, Rebecca Johnson, S. Liversedge (2006)
Raeding Wrods With Jubmled LettresPsychological Science, 17
D. Pelli, B. Farell, Deborah Moore (2003)
The remarkable inefficiency of word recognitionNature, 423
B. Rossion, I. Gauthier, V. Goffaux, M. Tarr, M. Crommelinck (2002)
Expertise Training with Novel Objects Leads to Left-Lateralized Facelike Electrophysiological ResponsesPsychological Science, 13
J. Ziegler, L. Ferrand, A. Jacobs, A. Rey, J. Grainger (2000)
Visual and Phonological Codes in Letter and Word Recognition: Evidence from Incremental PrimingQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53
J. McQueen, Malte Viebahn (2007)
Tracking recognition of spoken words by tracking looks to printed wordsQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60
P. Holcomb, J. Grainger (2006)
On the Time Course of Visual Word Recognition: An Event-related Potential Investigation using Masked Repetition PrimingJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18
Manuel Perea, Adelina Estévez
European Journal of Cognitive Psychology Transposed-letter Similarity Effects in Naming Pseudowords: Evidence from Children and Adults
S. Dehaene, Kimihiro Nakamura, A. Jobert, C. Kuroki, S. Ogawa, L. Cohen (2010)
Why do children make mirror errors in reading? Neural correlates of mirror invariance in the visual word form areaNeuroImage, 49
J. Rollenhagen, Carl Olson (2000)
Mirror-image confusion in single neurons of the macaque inferotemporal cortex.Science, 287 5457
U. Maurer, S. Brem, K. Bucher, D. Brandeis (2005)
Emerging Neurophysiological Specialization for Letter StringsJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17
J. Grainger, Bernard Lété, Daisy Bertand, S. Dufau, J. Ziegler (2012)
Evidence for multiple routes in learning to readCognition, 123
Perea Perea, Estévez Estévez (2008)
Transposed‐letter similarity effects in naming pseudowords: Evidence from children and adultsEuropean Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20
J. Grainger, J. Ziegler (2011)
A Dual-Route Approach to Orthographic ProcessingFrontiers in Psychology, 2
B. Tomasino, P. Borroni, Alessio Isaja, Raffaella Rumiati (2005)
The role of the primary motor cortex in mental rotation: a TMS studyCognitive Neuropsychology, 22
L. Pearce, S. Schanberg (2005)
Visual Receptive Fields of Neurons in Inferotemporal Cortex of the Monkey
A. Caramazza, A. Hillis (1990)
Spatial representation of words in the brain implied by studies of a unilateral neglect patientNature, 346
Dehaene Dehaene, Cohen Cohen, Sigman Sigman, Vinckier Vinckier (2005)
The neural code for written words: A proposalTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 9
J. Grainger, A. Jacobs (1996)
Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model.Psychological review, 103 3
Shane Mueller, C. Weidemann (2012)
Alphabetic letter identification: effects of perceivability, similarity, and bias.Acta psychologica, 139 1
J. Bowers (2003)
Masked priming: State of the Art
Paul Allopenna, J. Magnuson, M. Tanenhaus (1998)
Tracking the Time Course of Spoken Word Recognition Using Eye Movements: Evidence for Continuous Mapping ModelsJournal of Memory and Language, 38
L. Cohen, S. Dehaene (2004)
Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form areaNeuroImage, 22
K. James, T. James, G. Jobard, A. Wong, I. Gauthier (2005)
Letter processing in the visual system: Different activation patterns for single letters and stringsCognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5
U. Maurer, S. Brem, Felicitas Kranz, K. Bucher, Rosmarie Benz, P. Halder, H. Steinhausen, D. Brandeis (2006)
Coarse neural tuning for print peaks when children learn to readNeuroImage, 33
U. Goswami, J. Ziegler (2006)
Fluency, phonology and morphology: a response to the commentaries on becoming literate in different languagesDevelopmental Science, 9
(2009)
Recognition of Mirror Letters: Eye-Movement Evidence From Beginning and Expert Readers
James Cornell (1985)
Spontaneous mirror-writing in children.Canadian Journal of Psychology\/revue Canadienne De Psychologie, 39
J. Duñabeitia, Nicola Molinaro, M. Carreiras (2011)
Through the looking-glass: Mirror readingNeuroImage, 54
T. Jordan, Sharon Thomas, G. Patching (2003)
Assessing the importance of letter pairs in reading-parafoveal processing is not the only view: reply to Inhoff, Radach, Eiter, and Skelly (2003).Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 29 5
S. Dehaene, F. Pegado, L. Braga, P. Ventura, Gilberto Filho, A. Jobert, G. Dehaene-Lambertz, Régine Kolinsky, J. Morais, L. Cohen (2010)
How Learning to Read Changes the Cortical Networks for Vision and LanguageScience, 330
R. Rudel, H. Teuber (1963)
Discrimination of line in children.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 56
Rayner Rayner, White White, Johnson Johnson, Liversedge Liversedge (2006)
Raeding wrods with jubmled lettres: There's a costPsychological Science, 17
S. Brem, K. Bucher, P. Halder, P. Summers, T. Dietrich, E. Martin, D. Brandeis (2006)
Evidence for developmental changes in the visual word processing network beyond adolescenceNeuroImage, 29
Y. Benjamini, Y. Hochberg (1995)
Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testingJournal of the royal statistical society series b-methodological, 57
Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.9 No.7 July 2005 The neural code for written words: a proposal
A. Castles, C. Davis, K. Forster (2003)
Word recognition development in children: Insights from masked priming
N. Rubin (2001)
Figure and ground in the brainNature Neuroscience, 4
R. Guttentag, M. Haith (1980)
A Longitudinal Study of Word Processing by First-Grade Children.Journal of Educational Psychology, 72
ABSTRACT The visual word recognition system recruits neuronal systems originally developed for object perception which are characterized by orientation insensitivity to mirror reversals. It has been proposed that during reading acquisition beginning readers have to “unlearn” this natural tolerance to mirror reversals in order to efficiently discriminate letters and words. Therefore, it is supposed that this unlearning process takes place in a gradual way and that reading expertise modulates mirror‐letter discrimination. However, to date no supporting evidence for this has been obtained. We present data from an eye‐movement study that investigated the degree of sensitivity to mirror‐letters in a group of beginning readers and a group of expert readers. Participants had to decide which of the two strings presented on a screen corresponded to an auditorily presented word. Visual displays always included the correct target word and one distractor word. Results showed that those distractors that were the same as the target word except for the mirror lateralization of two internal letters attracted participants' attention more than distractors created by replacement of 2 internal letters. Interestingly, the time course of the effects was found to be different for the 2 groups, with beginning readers showing a greater tolerance (decreased sensitivity) to mirror‐letters than expert readers. Implications of these findings are discussed within the framework of preceding evidence showing how reading expertise modulates letter identification.
Mind, Brain, and Education – Wiley
Published: Jun 1, 2013
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.