Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Bennett, S. Sellars, R. Blanks, S. Moss (2012)
An observational study to evaluate the performance of units using two radiographers to read screening mammograms.Clinical radiology, 67 2
( Houn F , Brown ML . Current practice of screening mammography in the United States: data from the National Survey of Mammography Facilities. Radiology 1994; 190: 209–15.8259406)
Houn F , Brown ML . Current practice of screening mammography in the United States: data from the National Survey of Mammography Facilities. Radiology 1994; 190: 209–15.8259406Houn F , Brown ML . Current practice of screening mammography in the United States: data from the National Survey of Mammography Facilities. Radiology 1994; 190: 209–15.8259406, Houn F , Brown ML . Current practice of screening mammography in the United States: data from the National Survey of Mammography Facilities. Radiology 1994; 190: 209–15.8259406
( Wivell G , Denton ERE , Eve CB , et al. Can radiographers read screening mammograms? Clin Radiol 2003; 58: 63–7.12565207)
Wivell G , Denton ERE , Eve CB , et al. Can radiographers read screening mammograms? Clin Radiol 2003; 58: 63–7.12565207Wivell G , Denton ERE , Eve CB , et al. Can radiographers read screening mammograms? Clin Radiol 2003; 58: 63–7.12565207, Wivell G , Denton ERE , Eve CB , et al. Can radiographers read screening mammograms? Clin Radiol 2003; 58: 63–7.12565207
( Elmore JG , Wells CK , Howard DH . does diagnostic accuracy in mammography depend on radiologists’ experience? J Womens Health 1998; 7: 443–9.9611702)
Elmore JG , Wells CK , Howard DH . does diagnostic accuracy in mammography depend on radiologists’ experience? J Womens Health 1998; 7: 443–9.9611702Elmore JG , Wells CK , Howard DH . does diagnostic accuracy in mammography depend on radiologists’ experience? J Womens Health 1998; 7: 443–9.9611702, Elmore JG , Wells CK , Howard DH . does diagnostic accuracy in mammography depend on radiologists’ experience? J Womens Health 1998; 7: 443–9.9611702
( Liberman L , Menell JH . Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI‐RADS). Radiol Clin North Am 2002; 40: 409–30.12117184)
Liberman L , Menell JH . Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI‐RADS). Radiol Clin North Am 2002; 40: 409–30.12117184Liberman L , Menell JH . Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI‐RADS). Radiol Clin North Am 2002; 40: 409–30.12117184, Liberman L , Menell JH . Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI‐RADS). Radiol Clin North Am 2002; 40: 409–30.12117184
H. Frank (2002)
The AuthorsAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 46
D. Kopans (1992)
The positive predictive value of mammography.AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 158 3
F. Houn, M. Brown (1994)
Current practice of screening mammography in the United States: data from the National Survey of Mammography Facilities.Radiology, 190 1
( Bennett RL , Sellars SJ , Blanks RG , et al. An observational study to evaluate the performance of units using two radiographers to read screening mammograms. Clin Radiol 2012; 67: 114–21.22070944)
Bennett RL , Sellars SJ , Blanks RG , et al. An observational study to evaluate the performance of units using two radiographers to read screening mammograms. Clin Radiol 2012; 67: 114–21.22070944Bennett RL , Sellars SJ , Blanks RG , et al. An observational study to evaluate the performance of units using two radiographers to read screening mammograms. Clin Radiol 2012; 67: 114–21.22070944, Bennett RL , Sellars SJ , Blanks RG , et al. An observational study to evaluate the performance of units using two radiographers to read screening mammograms. Clin Radiol 2012; 67: 114–21.22070944
G. Torres-Mejía, Robert Smith, María Carranza-Flores, A. Bogart, Louis Martínez-Matsushita, D. Miglioretti, K. Kerlikowske, Carolina Ortega-Olvera, E. Montemayor-Varela, A. Ángeles-Llerenas, S. Bautista-Arredondo, G. Sánchez-González, O. Martínez-Montañez, Santos Uscanga-Sánchez, E. Lazcano-Ponce, M. Hernández-Ávila (2015)
Radiographers supporting radiologists in the interpretation of screening mammography: a viable strategy to meet the shortage in the number of radiologistsBMC Cancer, 15
( Abdel‐Razeq H , Mansour A , Jaddan D . Breast cancer care in Jordan. JCO Glob Oncol 2020; 260–8.32083950)
Abdel‐Razeq H , Mansour A , Jaddan D . Breast cancer care in Jordan. JCO Glob Oncol 2020; 260–8.32083950Abdel‐Razeq H , Mansour A , Jaddan D . Breast cancer care in Jordan. JCO Glob Oncol 2020; 260–8.32083950, Abdel‐Razeq H , Mansour A , Jaddan D . Breast cancer care in Jordan. JCO Glob Oncol 2020; 260–8.32083950
(2000)
BreastScreen Australia: achievement report 1997 and 1998. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare
E. Thurfjell, K Lernevall, A. Taube (1994)
Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program.Radiology, 191 1
G. Wivell, E.R.E Denton, C. Eve, J.C Inglis, I. Harvey (2003)
Can radiographers read screening mammograms?Clinical radiology, 58 1
UK National Health Service Breast Screening Web site. The NHS Breast Screening Programme
F. Biggelaar, P. Nelemans, K. Flobbe (2008)
Performance of radiographers in mammogram interpretation: a systematic review.Breast, 17 1
(2003)
Service Breast Screening Web site
( UK National Health Service Breast Screening Web site. The NHS Breast Screening Programme. Available at: http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/breastscreen. Accessibility verified September 10, 2003.)
UK National Health Service Breast Screening Web site. The NHS Breast Screening Programme. Available at: http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/breastscreen. Accessibility verified September 10, 2003.UK National Health Service Breast Screening Web site. The NHS Breast Screening Programme. Available at: http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/breastscreen. Accessibility verified September 10, 2003., UK National Health Service Breast Screening Web site. The NHS Breast Screening Programme. Available at: http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/breastscreen. Accessibility verified September 10, 2003.
J. Elmore, C. Wells, D. Howard (1998)
Does diagnostic accuracy in mammography depend on radiologists' experience?Journal of women's health, 7 4
Regina Pauli, S. Hammond, J. Cooke, J. Ansell (1996)
Radiographers as film readers in screening mammography: an assessment of competence under test and screening conditions.The British journal of radiology, 69 817
Josephine Debono, A. Poulos, N. Houssami, R. Turner, J. Boyages (2014)
Evaluation of radiographers’ mammography screen-reading accuracy in AustraliaJournal of Medical Radiation Sciences, 62
( Henderson LM , Benefield T , Marsh MW , et al. The influence of mammographic technologists on radiologists’ ability to interpret screening mammograms in community practice. Acad Radiol 2015; 22: 278–89.25435185)
Henderson LM , Benefield T , Marsh MW , et al. The influence of mammographic technologists on radiologists’ ability to interpret screening mammograms in community practice. Acad Radiol 2015; 22: 278–89.25435185Henderson LM , Benefield T , Marsh MW , et al. The influence of mammographic technologists on radiologists’ ability to interpret screening mammograms in community practice. Acad Radiol 2015; 22: 278–89.25435185, Henderson LM , Benefield T , Marsh MW , et al. The influence of mammographic technologists on radiologists’ ability to interpret screening mammograms in community practice. Acad Radiol 2015; 22: 278–89.25435185
( Kopans DB . The positive predictive value of mammography. Am J Roentgenol 1992; 158: 521–6.1310825)
Kopans DB . The positive predictive value of mammography. Am J Roentgenol 1992; 158: 521–6.1310825Kopans DB . The positive predictive value of mammography. Am J Roentgenol 1992; 158: 521–6.1310825, Kopans DB . The positive predictive value of mammography. Am J Roentgenol 1992; 158: 521–6.1310825
M. Yaffe, A. Bloomquist, D. Hunter, G. Mawdsley, A. Chiarelli, D. Muradali, J. Mainprize (2013)
Comparative performance of modern digital mammography systems in a large breast screening program.Medical physics, 40 12
( Krupinski EA , Berbaum KS , Caldwell RT , et al. Long radiology workdays reduce detection and accommodation accuracy. J Am Coll Radiol 2010; 7: 698–704.20816631)
Krupinski EA , Berbaum KS , Caldwell RT , et al. Long radiology workdays reduce detection and accommodation accuracy. J Am Coll Radiol 2010; 7: 698–704.20816631Krupinski EA , Berbaum KS , Caldwell RT , et al. Long radiology workdays reduce detection and accommodation accuracy. J Am Coll Radiol 2010; 7: 698–704.20816631, Krupinski EA , Berbaum KS , Caldwell RT , et al. Long radiology workdays reduce detection and accommodation accuracy. J Am Coll Radiol 2010; 7: 698–704.20816631
( de Bijl NPYM , van den Biggelaar FJHM , van Engelshoven JMA , et al. Pre‐reading mammograms by specialised breast technologists: legal implications for technologist and radiologist in the netherlands. Eur. J Health Law 2009; 16: 271–9.19788004)
de Bijl NPYM , van den Biggelaar FJHM , van Engelshoven JMA , et al. Pre‐reading mammograms by specialised breast technologists: legal implications for technologist and radiologist in the netherlands. Eur. J Health Law 2009; 16: 271–9.19788004de Bijl NPYM , van den Biggelaar FJHM , van Engelshoven JMA , et al. Pre‐reading mammograms by specialised breast technologists: legal implications for technologist and radiologist in the netherlands. Eur. J Health Law 2009; 16: 271–9.19788004, de Bijl NPYM , van den Biggelaar FJHM , van Engelshoven JMA , et al. Pre‐reading mammograms by specialised breast technologists: legal implications for technologist and radiologist in the netherlands. Eur. J Health Law 2009; 16: 271–9.19788004
( Reed WM , Lee WB , Cawson JN , et al. Malignancy detection in digital mammograms: important reader characteristics and required case numbers. Acad Radiol 2010; 17: 1409–13.20719545)
Reed WM , Lee WB , Cawson JN , et al. Malignancy detection in digital mammograms: important reader characteristics and required case numbers. Acad Radiol 2010; 17: 1409–13.20719545Reed WM , Lee WB , Cawson JN , et al. Malignancy detection in digital mammograms: important reader characteristics and required case numbers. Acad Radiol 2010; 17: 1409–13.20719545, Reed WM , Lee WB , Cawson JN , et al. Malignancy detection in digital mammograms: important reader characteristics and required case numbers. Acad Radiol 2010; 17: 1409–13.20719545
E. Ekpo, M. Alakhras, P. Brennan (2018)
Errors in Mammography Cannot be Solved Through Technology AloneAsian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP, 19
( van den Biggelaar FJHM , Nelemans PJ , Flobbe K . Performance of radiographers in mammogram interpretation: a systematic review. The Breast 2008; 17: 85–90.17764941)
van den Biggelaar FJHM , Nelemans PJ , Flobbe K . Performance of radiographers in mammogram interpretation: a systematic review. The Breast 2008; 17: 85–90.17764941van den Biggelaar FJHM , Nelemans PJ , Flobbe K . Performance of radiographers in mammogram interpretation: a systematic review. The Breast 2008; 17: 85–90.17764941, van den Biggelaar FJHM , Nelemans PJ , Flobbe K . Performance of radiographers in mammogram interpretation: a systematic review. The Breast 2008; 17: 85–90.17764941
( Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, BreastScreen Australia, Australia (eds). BreastScreen Australia: achievement report 1997 and 1998. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2000.)
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, BreastScreen Australia, Australia (eds). BreastScreen Australia: achievement report 1997 and 1998. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2000.Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, BreastScreen Australia, Australia (eds). BreastScreen Australia: achievement report 1997 and 1998. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2000., Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, BreastScreen Australia, Australia (eds). BreastScreen Australia: achievement report 1997 and 1998. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2000.
( Debono JC , Poulos AE , Houssami N , et al. Evaluation of radiographers’ mammography screen‐reading accuracy in Australia. J Med Radiat Sci 2015; 62: 15–22.26229663)
Debono JC , Poulos AE , Houssami N , et al. Evaluation of radiographers’ mammography screen‐reading accuracy in Australia. J Med Radiat Sci 2015; 62: 15–22.26229663Debono JC , Poulos AE , Houssami N , et al. Evaluation of radiographers’ mammography screen‐reading accuracy in Australia. J Med Radiat Sci 2015; 62: 15–22.26229663, Debono JC , Poulos AE , Houssami N , et al. Evaluation of radiographers’ mammography screen‐reading accuracy in Australia. J Med Radiat Sci 2015; 62: 15–22.26229663
( Ekpo EU , Alakhras M , Brennan P . Errors in mammography cannot be solved through technology alone. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2018; 19: 291–301.29479948)
Ekpo EU , Alakhras M , Brennan P . Errors in mammography cannot be solved through technology alone. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2018; 19: 291–301.29479948Ekpo EU , Alakhras M , Brennan P . Errors in mammography cannot be solved through technology alone. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2018; 19: 291–301.29479948, Ekpo EU , Alakhras M , Brennan P . Errors in mammography cannot be solved through technology alone. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2018; 19: 291–301.29479948
Judith Holt (2006)
Evaluating Radiological Technologist's Ability to Detect Abnormalities in Film-Screen Mammographic Images: A Decision Analysis Pilot ProjectCanadian Journal of Medical Radiation Technology, 37
( Torres‐Mejía G , Smith RA , de la Carranza‐Flores M , et al. Radiographers supporting radiologists in the interpretation of screening mammography: a viable strategy to meet the shortage in the number of radiologists. BMC Cancer 2015; 15: 410.25975383)
Torres‐Mejía G , Smith RA , de la Carranza‐Flores M , et al. Radiographers supporting radiologists in the interpretation of screening mammography: a viable strategy to meet the shortage in the number of radiologists. BMC Cancer 2015; 15: 410.25975383Torres‐Mejía G , Smith RA , de la Carranza‐Flores M , et al. Radiographers supporting radiologists in the interpretation of screening mammography: a viable strategy to meet the shortage in the number of radiologists. BMC Cancer 2015; 15: 410.25975383, Torres‐Mejía G , Smith RA , de la Carranza‐Flores M , et al. Radiographers supporting radiologists in the interpretation of screening mammography: a viable strategy to meet the shortage in the number of radiologists. BMC Cancer 2015; 15: 410.25975383
( Pauli R , Hammond S , Cooke J , et al. Comparison of radiographer/radiologist double film reading with single reading in breast cancer screening. J Med Screen 1996; 3: 18–22.8861046)
Pauli R , Hammond S , Cooke J , et al. Comparison of radiographer/radiologist double film reading with single reading in breast cancer screening. J Med Screen 1996; 3: 18–22.8861046Pauli R , Hammond S , Cooke J , et al. Comparison of radiographer/radiologist double film reading with single reading in breast cancer screening. J Med Screen 1996; 3: 18–22.8861046, Pauli R , Hammond S , Cooke J , et al. Comparison of radiographer/radiologist double film reading with single reading in breast cancer screening. J Med Screen 1996; 3: 18–22.8861046
( Moran S , Warren‐Forward H . A retrospective study of the performance of radiographers in interpreting screening mammograms. Radiography 2011; 17: 126–31.)
Moran S , Warren‐Forward H . A retrospective study of the performance of radiographers in interpreting screening mammograms. Radiography 2011; 17: 126–31.Moran S , Warren‐Forward H . A retrospective study of the performance of radiographers in interpreting screening mammograms. Radiography 2011; 17: 126–31., Moran S , Warren‐Forward H . A retrospective study of the performance of radiographers in interpreting screening mammograms. Radiography 2011; 17: 126–31.
P. Wing, M. Langelier (2009)
Workforce shortages in breast imaging: impact on mammography utilization.AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 192 2
D. Mousa, E. Ryan, C. Mello-Thoms, P. Brennan (2014)
What effect does mammographic breast density have on lesion detection in digital mammography?Clinical radiology, 69 4
F. Biggelaar, K. Flobbe, J. Engelshoven, N. Bijl (2009)
Pre-reading mammograms by specialised breast technologists: legal implications for technologist and radiologist in The Netherlands.European journal of health law, 16 3
Elizabeth Krupinski, K. Berbaum, R. Caldwell, K. Schartz, John Kim (2010)
Long radiology workdays reduce detection and accommodation accuracy.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR, 7 9
( Holt JJ . Evaluating radiological technologist’s ability to detect abnormalities in film‐screen mammographic images: a decision analysis pilot project. Can J Med Radiat Technol 2006; 37: 24–9.)
Holt JJ . Evaluating radiological technologist’s ability to detect abnormalities in film‐screen mammographic images: a decision analysis pilot project. Can J Med Radiat Technol 2006; 37: 24–9.Holt JJ . Evaluating radiological technologist’s ability to detect abnormalities in film‐screen mammographic images: a decision analysis pilot project. Can J Med Radiat Technol 2006; 37: 24–9., Holt JJ . Evaluating radiological technologist’s ability to detect abnormalities in film‐screen mammographic images: a decision analysis pilot project. Can J Med Radiat Technol 2006; 37: 24–9.
( D’Orsi CJ , Sickles EA , Mendelson EB , et al. ACR BI‐RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA, 2013.)
D’Orsi CJ , Sickles EA , Mendelson EB , et al. ACR BI‐RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA, 2013.D’Orsi CJ , Sickles EA , Mendelson EB , et al. ACR BI‐RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA, 2013., D’Orsi CJ , Sickles EA , Mendelson EB , et al. ACR BI‐RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA, 2013.
Louise Henderson, T. Benefield, Mary Marsh, B. Schroeder, Danielle Durham, B. Yankaskas, J. Bowling (2015)
The influence of mammographic technologists on radiologists' ability to interpret screening mammograms in community practice.Academic radiology, 22 3
N. Boyd, G. Dite, J. Stone, A. Gunasekara, D. English, M. Mccredie, G. Giles, D. Tritchler, A. Chiarelli, M. Yaffe, J. Hopper (2002)
Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer.The New England journal of medicine, 347 12
( Yaffe MJ , Bloomquist AK , Hunter DM , et al. Comparative performance of modern digital mammography systems in a large breast screening program: Comparative performance of CR and DR mammography systems. Med Phys 2013; 40: 121915.24320526)
Yaffe MJ , Bloomquist AK , Hunter DM , et al. Comparative performance of modern digital mammography systems in a large breast screening program: Comparative performance of CR and DR mammography systems. Med Phys 2013; 40: 121915.24320526Yaffe MJ , Bloomquist AK , Hunter DM , et al. Comparative performance of modern digital mammography systems in a large breast screening program: Comparative performance of CR and DR mammography systems. Med Phys 2013; 40: 121915.24320526, Yaffe MJ , Bloomquist AK , Hunter DM , et al. Comparative performance of modern digital mammography systems in a large breast screening program: Comparative performance of CR and DR mammography systems. Med Phys 2013; 40: 121915.24320526
W. Reed, Warwick Lee, J. Cawson, P. Brennan (2010)
Malignancy detection in digital mammograms: important reader characteristics and required case numbers.Academic radiology, 17 11
( Rawashdeh MA , Lee WB , Bourne RM , et al. Markers of good performance in mammography depend on number of annual readings. Radiology 2013; 269: 61–7.23737538)
Rawashdeh MA , Lee WB , Bourne RM , et al. Markers of good performance in mammography depend on number of annual readings. Radiology 2013; 269: 61–7.23737538Rawashdeh MA , Lee WB , Bourne RM , et al. Markers of good performance in mammography depend on number of annual readings. Radiology 2013; 269: 61–7.23737538, Rawashdeh MA , Lee WB , Bourne RM , et al. Markers of good performance in mammography depend on number of annual readings. Radiology 2013; 269: 61–7.23737538
( Thurfjell EL , Lernevall KA , Taube AA . Benefit of independent double reading in a population‐based mammography screening program. Radiology 1994; 191: 241–4.8134580)
Thurfjell EL , Lernevall KA , Taube AA . Benefit of independent double reading in a population‐based mammography screening program. Radiology 1994; 191: 241–4.8134580Thurfjell EL , Lernevall KA , Taube AA . Benefit of independent double reading in a population‐based mammography screening program. Radiology 1994; 191: 241–4.8134580, Thurfjell EL , Lernevall KA , Taube AA . Benefit of independent double reading in a population‐based mammography screening program. Radiology 1994; 191: 241–4.8134580
R. Pauli, S. Hammond, J. Cooke, J. Ansell (1996)
Comparison of Radiographer/Radiologist Double Film Reading with Single Reading in Breast Cancer ScreeningJournal of Medical Screening, 3
( Mousa AL , Ryan EA , Mello‐Thoms C , Brennan PC . What effect does mammographic breast density have on lesion detection in digital mammography? Clin Radiol 2014; 69: 333–41.24424328)
Mousa AL , Ryan EA , Mello‐Thoms C , Brennan PC . What effect does mammographic breast density have on lesion detection in digital mammography? Clin Radiol 2014; 69: 333–41.24424328Mousa AL , Ryan EA , Mello‐Thoms C , Brennan PC . What effect does mammographic breast density have on lesion detection in digital mammography? Clin Radiol 2014; 69: 333–41.24424328, Mousa AL , Ryan EA , Mello‐Thoms C , Brennan PC . What effect does mammographic breast density have on lesion detection in digital mammography? Clin Radiol 2014; 69: 333–41.24424328
L. Liberman, J. Menell (2002)
Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS).Radiologic clinics of North America, 40 3
H. Abdel-Razeq, Asem Mansour, Dima Jaddan (2020)
Breast Cancer Care in JordanJCO Global Oncology, 6
( Andersson I , Janzon L . Reduced breast cancer mortality in women under age 50: updated results from the Malmö mammographic screening program. JNCI Monogr 1997; 1997: 63–7.)
Andersson I , Janzon L . Reduced breast cancer mortality in women under age 50: updated results from the Malmö mammographic screening program. JNCI Monogr 1997; 1997: 63–7.Andersson I , Janzon L . Reduced breast cancer mortality in women under age 50: updated results from the Malmö mammographic screening program. JNCI Monogr 1997; 1997: 63–7., Andersson I , Janzon L . Reduced breast cancer mortality in women under age 50: updated results from the Malmö mammographic screening program. JNCI Monogr 1997; 1997: 63–7.
( Boyd NF , Dite GS , Stone J , et al. Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 886–94.12239257)
Boyd NF , Dite GS , Stone J , et al. Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 886–94.12239257Boyd NF , Dite GS , Stone J , et al. Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 886–94.12239257, Boyd NF , Dite GS , Stone J , et al. Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 886–94.12239257
M. Rawashdeh, Warwick Lee, R. Bourne, E. Ryan, M. Pietrzyk, W. Reed, R. Heard, D. Black, P. Brennan (2013)
Markers of good performance in mammography depend on number of annual readings.Radiology, 269 1
S. Moran, H. Warren-Forward (2016)
Can Australian radiographers assess screening mammograms accurately? First stage results from a four year prospective studyRadiography, 22
S. Moran, H. Warren-Forward (2011)
A retrospective study of the performance of radiographers in interpreting screening mammogramsRadiography, 17
I. Andersson, L. Janzon (1997)
Reduced breast cancer mortality in women under age 50: updated results from the Malmö Mammographic Screening Program.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs, 22
J. Holt, Karen Pollard (2010)
Radiographers' Ability to Perceive and Classify Abnormalities on Mammographic Images - Results of a Pilot ProjectRadiographer: The Official Journal of the Australian Institute of Radiography, The, 57
( Wing P , Langelier MH . Workforce shortages in breast imaging: impact on mammography utilization. Am J Roentgenol 2009; 192: 370–8.19155396)
Wing P , Langelier MH . Workforce shortages in breast imaging: impact on mammography utilization. Am J Roentgenol 2009; 192: 370–8.19155396Wing P , Langelier MH . Workforce shortages in breast imaging: impact on mammography utilization. Am J Roentgenol 2009; 192: 370–8.19155396, Wing P , Langelier MH . Workforce shortages in breast imaging: impact on mammography utilization. Am J Roentgenol 2009; 192: 370–8.19155396
J. Elmore, Sara Jackson, L. Abraham, D. Miglioretti, P. Carney, B. Geller, B. Yankaskas, K. Kerlikowske, T. Onega, R. Rosenberg, E. Sickles, D. Buist (2009)
Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists' characteristics associated with accuracy.Radiology, 253 3
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences – Wiley
Published: Mar 1, 2022
Keywords: Breast; mammography; reporting; screening
You can share this free article with as many people as you like with the url below! We hope you enjoy this feature!
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.