Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
( Escandell‐Vidal, V. (2009). Differential object marking and topicality: The case of Balearic Catalan. Studies in Language, 33(4), 832–885.)
Escandell‐Vidal, V. (2009). Differential object marking and topicality: The case of Balearic Catalan. Studies in Language, 33(4), 832–885.Escandell‐Vidal, V. (2009). Differential object marking and topicality: The case of Balearic Catalan. Studies in Language, 33(4), 832–885., Escandell‐Vidal, V. (2009). Differential object marking and topicality: The case of Balearic Catalan. Studies in Language, 33(4), 832–885.
Chigusa Kurumada, T. Jaeger (2015)
Communicative efficiency in language production: Optional case-marking in JapaneseJournal of Memory and Language, 83
T. Givón (1976)
Subject and topic
C. Kam, E. Newport (2009)
Getting it right by getting it wrong: When learners change languagesCognitive Psychology, 59
Morten Christiansen, N. Chater (2008)
Language as shaped by the brain.The Behavioral and brain sciences, 31 5
( Du Bois, J. W. (1987). The discourse basis of ergativity. Language, 63(4), 805–855.)
Du Bois, J. W. (1987). The discourse basis of ergativity. Language, 63(4), 805–855.Du Bois, J. W. (1987). The discourse basis of ergativity. Language, 63(4), 805–855., Du Bois, J. W. (1987). The discourse basis of ergativity. Language, 63(4), 805–855.
R. Levy, T. F. Jaeger (2007)
Advances in neural information processing systems (NIPS) 19
Giorgio Iemmolo (2013)
Symmetric and asymmetric alternations in direct object encoding, 66
Carla Kam, E. Newport (2005)
Regularizing Unpredictable Variation: The Roles of Adult and Child Learners in Language Formation and ChangeLanguage Learning and Development, 1
M. Silverstein (1976)
Grammatical categories in Australian languages
N. Evans, S. Levinson (2009)
The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science.The Behavioral and brain sciences, 32 5
B. Bickel, A. Witzlack‐Makarevich, T. Zakharko (2014)
Scales: A cross‐disciplinary perspective on referential hierarchies
H. Clark, E. Clark (1979)
Psychology and language : an introduction to psycholinguisticsLanguage, 55
Ilja Seržant (2019)
Weak universal forces: The discriminatory function of case in differential object marking systems
Joan Bybee (2006)
Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language
J. Greenberg (1963)
Universals of language
N. Levshina, Steven Moran (2021)
Efficiency in human languages: Corpus evidence for universal principlesLinguistics Vanguard, 7
M. Haspelmath (2008)
Language universals and language change
( Hudson Kam, C. L. , & Newport, E. L. (2009). Getting it right by getting it wrong: When learners change languages. Cognitive Psychology, 59(1), 30–66.19324332)
Hudson Kam, C. L. , & Newport, E. L. (2009). Getting it right by getting it wrong: When learners change languages. Cognitive Psychology, 59(1), 30–66.19324332Hudson Kam, C. L. , & Newport, E. L. (2009). Getting it right by getting it wrong: When learners change languages. Cognitive Psychology, 59(1), 30–66.19324332, Hudson Kam, C. L. , & Newport, E. L. (2009). Getting it right by getting it wrong: When learners change languages. Cognitive Psychology, 59(1), 30–66.19324332
Alexander Martin, S. Peperkamp (2020)
Phonetically natural rules benefit from a learning bias: a re-examination of vowel harmony and disharmonyPhonology, 37
P. Austin (2001)
Forty years on: Ken hale and Australian languages
(1978)
On the case marking of objects
( Gundel, J. K. (1988). Universals of topic‐comment structure. In M. Hammond , E. A. Moravcsik , & J. R. Wirth (Eds.), Studies in syntactic typology (pp. 209–239). Benjamins.)
Gundel, J. K. (1988). Universals of topic‐comment structure. In M. Hammond , E. A. Moravcsik , & J. R. Wirth (Eds.), Studies in syntactic typology (pp. 209–239). Benjamins.Gundel, J. K. (1988). Universals of topic‐comment structure. In M. Hammond , E. A. Moravcsik , & J. R. Wirth (Eds.), Studies in syntactic typology (pp. 209–239). Benjamins., Gundel, J. K. (1988). Universals of topic‐comment structure. In M. Hammond , E. A. Moravcsik , & J. R. Wirth (Eds.), Studies in syntactic typology (pp. 209–239). Benjamins.
N. Levshina (2021)
Communicative efficiency and differential case marking: a reverse-engineering approachLinguistics Vanguard, 7
I. Bornkessel‐Schlesewsky, K. K. Choudhary, A. Witzlack‐Makarevich, B. Bickel (2008)
Scales
Austin P. (2001)
205
( Chafe, W. L. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 25–56). Academic Press.)
Chafe, W. L. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 25–56). Academic Press.Chafe, W. L. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 25–56). Academic Press., Chafe, W. L. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 25–56). Academic Press.
P. Austin, Critical Enquiry. (1992)
Word order in a free word order language : the case of Jiwarli.
S. Raz (1985)
Tigre grammar and texts
R. Levy, T. Jaeger (2006)
Speakers optimize information density through syntactic reduction
Y. Chao, G. Zipf (1950)
Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human EcologyLanguage, 26
Magnus Huber, M. Meeuwis (2013)
Order of subject, object, and verbThe atlas of pidgin and creole language structures
W. Croft (2003)
Typology and universals
E. Gibson, S. Piantadosi, Kimberly Brink, Leon Bergen, Eunice Lim, R. Saxe (2013)
A Noisy-Channel Account of Crosslinguistic Word-Order VariationPsychological Science, 24
( Gibson, E. , Piantadosi, S. T. , Brink, K. , Bergen, L. , Lim, E. , & Saxe, R. (2013). A noisy‐channel account of crosslinguistic word‐order variation. Psychological Science, 24(7), 1079–1088.23649563)
Gibson, E. , Piantadosi, S. T. , Brink, K. , Bergen, L. , Lim, E. , & Saxe, R. (2013). A noisy‐channel account of crosslinguistic word‐order variation. Psychological Science, 24(7), 1079–1088.23649563Gibson, E. , Piantadosi, S. T. , Brink, K. , Bergen, L. , Lim, E. , & Saxe, R. (2013). A noisy‐channel account of crosslinguistic word‐order variation. Psychological Science, 24(7), 1079–1088.23649563, Gibson, E. , Piantadosi, S. T. , Brink, K. , Bergen, L. , Lim, E. , & Saxe, R. (2013). A noisy‐channel account of crosslinguistic word‐order variation. Psychological Science, 24(7), 1079–1088.23649563
( Payne, D. L. (1992). Pragmatics of word order flexibility (vol. 22). John Benjamins Publishing.)
Payne, D. L. (1992). Pragmatics of word order flexibility (vol. 22). John Benjamins Publishing.Payne, D. L. (1992). Pragmatics of word order flexibility (vol. 22). John Benjamins Publishing., Payne, D. L. (1992). Pragmatics of word order flexibility (vol. 22). John Benjamins Publishing.
Gertraud Fenk-Oczlon (1989)
Word frequency and word order in freezes, 27
( Silverstein, M. (1976). Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In R. M. W. Dixon (Ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages (pp. 112–171). Australian Institute for Aboriginal Studies.)
Silverstein, M. (1976). Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In R. M. W. Dixon (Ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages (pp. 112–171). Australian Institute for Aboriginal Studies.Silverstein, M. (1976). Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In R. M. W. Dixon (Ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages (pp. 112–171). Australian Institute for Aboriginal Studies., Silverstein, M. (1976). Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In R. M. W. Dixon (Ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages (pp. 112–171). Australian Institute for Aboriginal Studies.
Doris Payne (1992)
Pragmatics of Word Order FlexibilityLanguage, 70
( Bickel, B. , Witzlack‐Makarevich, A. , & Zakharko, T. (2014). Typological evidence against universal effects of referential scales on case alignment. In I. Bornkessel‐Schlesewsky , A. Malchukov , & M. Richards (Eds.), Scales: A cross‐disciplinary perspective on referential hierarchies (pp. 7–43). De Gruyter Mouton.)
Bickel, B. , Witzlack‐Makarevich, A. , & Zakharko, T. (2014). Typological evidence against universal effects of referential scales on case alignment. In I. Bornkessel‐Schlesewsky , A. Malchukov , & M. Richards (Eds.), Scales: A cross‐disciplinary perspective on referential hierarchies (pp. 7–43). De Gruyter Mouton.Bickel, B. , Witzlack‐Makarevich, A. , & Zakharko, T. (2014). Typological evidence against universal effects of referential scales on case alignment. In I. Bornkessel‐Schlesewsky , A. Malchukov , & M. Richards (Eds.), Scales: A cross‐disciplinary perspective on referential hierarchies (pp. 7–43). De Gruyter Mouton., Bickel, B. , Witzlack‐Makarevich, A. , & Zakharko, T. (2014). Typological evidence against universal effects of referential scales on case alignment. In I. Bornkessel‐Schlesewsky , A. Malchukov , & M. Richards (Eds.), Scales: A cross‐disciplinary perspective on referential hierarchies (pp. 7–43). De Gruyter Mouton.
W. Chafe (1976)
Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view
J. Culbertson (2012)
Typological Universals as Reflections of Biased Learning: Evidence from Artificial Language LearningLang. Linguistics Compass, 6
H. Branigan, M. Pickering, Alexandra Cleland (2000)
Syntactic co-ordination in dialogueCognition, 75
( Dixon, R. M. W. (1994). Ergativity. Cambridge University Press.)
Dixon, R. M. W. (1994). Ergativity. Cambridge University Press.Dixon, R. M. W. (1994). Ergativity. Cambridge University Press., Dixon, R. M. W. (1994). Ergativity. Cambridge University Press.
Martin Haspelmath (2021)
Explaining grammatical coding asymmetries: Form–frequency correspondences and predictabilityJournal of Linguistics, 57
( Branigan, H. P. , Pickering, M. J. , & Cleland, A. A. (2000). Syntactic co‐ordination in dialogue. Cognition, 75, 13–25.)
Branigan, H. P. , Pickering, M. J. , & Cleland, A. A. (2000). Syntactic co‐ordination in dialogue. Cognition, 75, 13–25.Branigan, H. P. , Pickering, M. J. , & Cleland, A. A. (2000). Syntactic co‐ordination in dialogue. Cognition, 75, 13–25., Branigan, H. P. , Pickering, M. J. , & Cleland, A. A. (2000). Syntactic co‐ordination in dialogue. Cognition, 75, 13–25.
J. Culbertson, S. Kirby (2016)
Simplicity and Specificity in Language: Domain-General Biases Have Domain-Specific EffectsFrontiers in Psychology, 6
L. Downing, Göteborgs (2018)
Differential object marking in Chichewa
( Smith, K. , & Culbertson, J. (2020). Communicative pressures shape language during communication (not learning): Evidence from casemarking in artificial languages. 10.31234/osf.io/5nwhq )
Smith, K. , & Culbertson, J. (2020). Communicative pressures shape language during communication (not learning): Evidence from casemarking in artificial languages. 10.31234/osf.io/5nwhqSmith, K. , & Culbertson, J. (2020). Communicative pressures shape language during communication (not learning): Evidence from casemarking in artificial languages. 10.31234/osf.io/5nwhq , Smith, K. , & Culbertson, J. (2020). Communicative pressures shape language during communication (not learning): Evidence from casemarking in artificial languages. 10.31234/osf.io/5nwhq
G. Iemmolo (2011)
Towards a typological study of differential object marking and differential object indexation
( Croft, W. (2003). Typology and universals (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.)
Croft, W. (2003). Typology and universals (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.Croft, W. (2003). Typology and universals (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press., Croft, W. (2003). Typology and universals (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Jennifer Arnold, Anthony Losongco, T. Wasow, Ryan Ginstrom (2015)
Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent orderingLanguage, 76
G. Fenk‐Oczlon (2001)
Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure
( Evans, N. , & Levinson, S. C. (2009). The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 429–492.19857320)
Evans, N. , & Levinson, S. C. (2009). The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 429–492.19857320Evans, N. , & Levinson, S. C. (2009). The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 429–492.19857320, Evans, N. , & Levinson, S. C. (2009). The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 429–492.19857320
E. Kaiser, J. Trueswell (2004)
The role of discourse context in the processing of a flexible word-order languageCognition, 94
( Levshina, N. , & Moran, S. (2021). Efficiency in human languages: Corpus evidence for universal principles. Linguistics Vanguard, 7, 1–8.)
Levshina, N. , & Moran, S. (2021). Efficiency in human languages: Corpus evidence for universal principles. Linguistics Vanguard, 7, 1–8.Levshina, N. , & Moran, S. (2021). Efficiency in human languages: Corpus evidence for universal principles. Linguistics Vanguard, 7, 1–8., Levshina, N. , & Moran, S. (2021). Efficiency in human languages: Corpus evidence for universal principles. Linguistics Vanguard, 7, 1–8.
( Cristofaro, S. (2019). Taking diachronic evidence seriously: Result‐oriented vs. source‐oriented explanations of typological universals. In K. Schmidtke‐Bode , N. Levshina , S. M. Michaelis , & I. A. Seržant (Eds.), Explanation in typology: Diachronic sources, functional motivations and the nature of the evidence (pp. 25–46). Language Science Press.)
Cristofaro, S. (2019). Taking diachronic evidence seriously: Result‐oriented vs. source‐oriented explanations of typological universals. In K. Schmidtke‐Bode , N. Levshina , S. M. Michaelis , & I. A. Seržant (Eds.), Explanation in typology: Diachronic sources, functional motivations and the nature of the evidence (pp. 25–46). Language Science Press.Cristofaro, S. (2019). Taking diachronic evidence seriously: Result‐oriented vs. source‐oriented explanations of typological universals. In K. Schmidtke‐Bode , N. Levshina , S. M. Michaelis , & I. A. Seržant (Eds.), Explanation in typology: Diachronic sources, functional motivations and the nature of the evidence (pp. 25–46). Language Science Press., Cristofaro, S. (2019). Taking diachronic evidence seriously: Result‐oriented vs. source‐oriented explanations of typological universals. In K. Schmidtke‐Bode , N. Levshina , S. M. Michaelis , & I. A. Seržant (Eds.), Explanation in typology: Diachronic sources, functional motivations and the nature of the evidence (pp. 25–46). Language Science Press.
( Downing, L. J. (2018). Differential object marking in Chichewa. In I. A. Seržant & A. Witzlack‐Makarevich (Eds.), Diachrony of differential argument marking (pp. 41–68). Language Science Press.)
Downing, L. J. (2018). Differential object marking in Chichewa. In I. A. Seržant & A. Witzlack‐Makarevich (Eds.), Diachrony of differential argument marking (pp. 41–68). Language Science Press.Downing, L. J. (2018). Differential object marking in Chichewa. In I. A. Seržant & A. Witzlack‐Makarevich (Eds.), Diachrony of differential argument marking (pp. 41–68). Language Science Press., Downing, L. J. (2018). Differential object marking in Chichewa. In I. A. Seržant & A. Witzlack‐Makarevich (Eds.), Diachrony of differential argument marking (pp. 41–68). Language Science Press.
Masha Fedzechkina, T. Jaeger (2019)
Production efficiency can cause grammatical change: Learners deviate from the input to better balance efficiency against robust message transmissionCognition, 196
S. Cristofaro (2013)
The referential hierarchy: reviewing the evidence in diachronic perspective
( Jäger, G. (2007). Evolutionary game theory and typology: A case study. Language, 83(1), 74–109.)
Jäger, G. (2007). Evolutionary game theory and typology: A case study. Language, 83(1), 74–109.Jäger, G. (2007). Evolutionary game theory and typology: A case study. Language, 83(1), 74–109., Jäger, G. (2007). Evolutionary game theory and typology: A case study. Language, 83(1), 74–109.
James Stanlaw (2020)
ErgativityThe International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology
(2003)
Typology and universals (2nd ed.)
( Christiansen, M. H. , & Chater, N. (2008). Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(5), 489–509.18826669)
Christiansen, M. H. , & Chater, N. (2008). Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(5), 489–509.18826669Christiansen, M. H. , & Chater, N. (2008). Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(5), 489–509.18826669, Christiansen, M. H. , & Chater, N. (2008). Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(5), 489–509.18826669
( St Clair, M. C. , Monaghan, P. , & Ramscar, M. (2009). Relationships between language structure and language learning: The suffixing preference and grammatical categorization. Cognitive Science, 33(7), 1317–1329.21585507)
St Clair, M. C. , Monaghan, P. , & Ramscar, M. (2009). Relationships between language structure and language learning: The suffixing preference and grammatical categorization. Cognitive Science, 33(7), 1317–1329.21585507St Clair, M. C. , Monaghan, P. , & Ramscar, M. (2009). Relationships between language structure and language learning: The suffixing preference and grammatical categorization. Cognitive Science, 33(7), 1317–1329.21585507, St Clair, M. C. , Monaghan, P. , & Ramscar, M. (2009). Relationships between language structure and language learning: The suffixing preference and grammatical categorization. Cognitive Science, 33(7), 1317–1329.21585507
M. Escandell-Vidal (2009)
Differential object marking and topicality: The case of Balearic CatalanStudies in Language, 33
Gertraud Fenk-Oczlon (2001)
Familiarity, information flow, and linguistic form
( Bybee, J. (2007). Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford University Press.)
Bybee, J. (2007). Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford University Press.Bybee, J. (2007). Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford University Press., Bybee, J. (2007). Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford University Press.
( Kaiser, E. , & Trueswell, J. C. (2004). The role of discourse context in the processing of a flexible word‐order language. Cognition, 94(2), 113–147.15582623)
Kaiser, E. , & Trueswell, J. C. (2004). The role of discourse context in the processing of a flexible word‐order language. Cognition, 94(2), 113–147.15582623Kaiser, E. , & Trueswell, J. C. (2004). The role of discourse context in the processing of a flexible word‐order language. Cognition, 94(2), 113–147.15582623, Kaiser, E. , & Trueswell, J. C. (2004). The role of discourse context in the processing of a flexible word‐order language. Cognition, 94(2), 113–147.15582623
( Tily, H. , & Jaeger, T. (2011). Complementing quantitative typology with behavioral approaches: Evidence for typological universals. Linguistic Typology, 15, 497–508.)
Tily, H. , & Jaeger, T. (2011). Complementing quantitative typology with behavioral approaches: Evidence for typological universals. Linguistic Typology, 15, 497–508.Tily, H. , & Jaeger, T. (2011). Complementing quantitative typology with behavioral approaches: Evidence for typological universals. Linguistic Typology, 15, 497–508., Tily, H. , & Jaeger, T. (2011). Complementing quantitative typology with behavioral approaches: Evidence for typological universals. Linguistic Typology, 15, 497–508.
( Birner, B. J. , & Ward, G. (2009). Information structure and syntactic structure. Linguistics and Language Compass, 3(4), 1167–1187.)
Birner, B. J. , & Ward, G. (2009). Information structure and syntactic structure. Linguistics and Language Compass, 3(4), 1167–1187.Birner, B. J. , & Ward, G. (2009). Information structure and syntactic structure. Linguistics and Language Compass, 3(4), 1167–1187., Birner, B. J. , & Ward, G. (2009). Information structure and syntactic structure. Linguistics and Language Compass, 3(4), 1167–1187.
G. Bossong (1991)
New analyses in Romance linguistics
( Haspelmath, M. (2021b). Role‐reference associations and the explanation of argument coding splits. Linguistics, 59(1), 123–174.)
Haspelmath, M. (2021b). Role‐reference associations and the explanation of argument coding splits. Linguistics, 59(1), 123–174.Haspelmath, M. (2021b). Role‐reference associations and the explanation of argument coding splits. Linguistics, 59(1), 123–174., Haspelmath, M. (2021b). Role‐reference associations and the explanation of argument coding splits. Linguistics, 59(1), 123–174.
Giorgio Iemmolo (2010)
Topicality and differential object markingStudies in Language, 34
( Moravcsik, E. A. (1978). On the case marking of objects. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of human language (pp. 249–289). Stanford University Press.)
Moravcsik, E. A. (1978). On the case marking of objects. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of human language (pp. 249–289). Stanford University Press.Moravcsik, E. A. (1978). On the case marking of objects. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of human language (pp. 249–289). Stanford University Press., Moravcsik, E. A. (1978). On the case marking of objects. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of human language (pp. 249–289). Stanford University Press.
( Iemmolo, G. (2013). Symmetric and asymmetric alternations in direct object encoding. STUF: Language Typology and Universals, 66(4), 378–403.)
Iemmolo, G. (2013). Symmetric and asymmetric alternations in direct object encoding. STUF: Language Typology and Universals, 66(4), 378–403.Iemmolo, G. (2013). Symmetric and asymmetric alternations in direct object encoding. STUF: Language Typology and Universals, 66(4), 378–403., Iemmolo, G. (2013). Symmetric and asymmetric alternations in direct object encoding. STUF: Language Typology and Universals, 66(4), 378–403.
( Levy, R. , & Jaeger, T. F. (2007). Speakers optimize information density through syntactic reduction. In B. Schlökopf , J. Platt , & T. Hoffman (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (NIPS) 19 (pp. 849–856). MIT Press.)
Levy, R. , & Jaeger, T. F. (2007). Speakers optimize information density through syntactic reduction. In B. Schlökopf , J. Platt , & T. Hoffman (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (NIPS) 19 (pp. 849–856). MIT Press.Levy, R. , & Jaeger, T. F. (2007). Speakers optimize information density through syntactic reduction. In B. Schlökopf , J. Platt , & T. Hoffman (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (NIPS) 19 (pp. 849–856). MIT Press., Levy, R. , & Jaeger, T. F. (2007). Speakers optimize information density through syntactic reduction. In B. Schlökopf , J. Platt , & T. Hoffman (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (NIPS) 19 (pp. 849–856). MIT Press.
( Barr, D. J. , Levy, R. , Scheepers, C. , & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278.)
Barr, D. J. , Levy, R. , Scheepers, C. , & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278.Barr, D. J. , Levy, R. , Scheepers, C. , & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278., Barr, D. J. , Levy, R. , Scheepers, C. , & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278.
( Culbertson, J. , Smolensky, P. , & Legendre, G. (2012). Learning biases predict a word order universal. Cognition, 122(3), 306–329.22208785)
Culbertson, J. , Smolensky, P. , & Legendre, G. (2012). Learning biases predict a word order universal. Cognition, 122(3), 306–329.22208785Culbertson, J. , Smolensky, P. , & Legendre, G. (2012). Learning biases predict a word order universal. Cognition, 122(3), 306–329.22208785, Culbertson, J. , Smolensky, P. , & Legendre, G. (2012). Learning biases predict a word order universal. Cognition, 122(3), 306–329.22208785
Martin Haspelmath (2008)
Creating economical morphosyntactic patterns in language change
( Comrie, B. (1978). Ergativity. In W. P. Lehmann (Ed.), Syntactic typology: Studies in the phenomenology of language (pp. 329–394). University of Texas Press.)
Comrie, B. (1978). Ergativity. In W. P. Lehmann (Ed.), Syntactic typology: Studies in the phenomenology of language (pp. 329–394). University of Texas Press.Comrie, B. (1978). Ergativity. In W. P. Lehmann (Ed.), Syntactic typology: Studies in the phenomenology of language (pp. 329–394). University of Texas Press., Comrie, B. (1978). Ergativity. In W. P. Lehmann (Ed.), Syntactic typology: Studies in the phenomenology of language (pp. 329–394). University of Texas Press.
Martin Haspelmath (2020)
Role-reference associations and the explanation of argument coding splitsLinguistics, 59
L. J. Downing (2018)
Diachrony of differential argument marking
Kenny Smith, J. Culbertson (2020)
Communicative pressures shape language during communication (not learning): Evidence from casemarking in artificial languages
R. Tomlin (1995)
Focal attention, voice, and word order: an experimental, cross-linguistic study
( Fenk‐Oczlon, G. (2001). Familiarity, information flow, and linguistic form. In J. Bybee & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (pp. 431–448). John Benjamins.)
Fenk‐Oczlon, G. (2001). Familiarity, information flow, and linguistic form. In J. Bybee & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (pp. 431–448). John Benjamins.Fenk‐Oczlon, G. (2001). Familiarity, information flow, and linguistic form. In J. Bybee & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (pp. 431–448). John Benjamins., Fenk‐Oczlon, G. (2001). Familiarity, information flow, and linguistic form. In J. Bybee & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (pp. 431–448). John Benjamins.
Bornkessel‐Schlesewsky I. (2008)
397
( Bornkessel‐Schlesewsky, I. , Choudhary, K. K. , Witzlack‐Makarevich, A. , & Bickel, B. (2008). Bridging the gap between processing preferences and typological distributions: Initial evidence from the online comprehension of control constructions in Hindi. In A. Malchukov & M. Richards (Eds.), Scales (pp. 397–436). Institut für Linguistik der Universität Leipzig.)
Bornkessel‐Schlesewsky, I. , Choudhary, K. K. , Witzlack‐Makarevich, A. , & Bickel, B. (2008). Bridging the gap between processing preferences and typological distributions: Initial evidence from the online comprehension of control constructions in Hindi. In A. Malchukov & M. Richards (Eds.), Scales (pp. 397–436). Institut für Linguistik der Universität Leipzig.Bornkessel‐Schlesewsky, I. , Choudhary, K. K. , Witzlack‐Makarevich, A. , & Bickel, B. (2008). Bridging the gap between processing preferences and typological distributions: Initial evidence from the online comprehension of control constructions in Hindi. In A. Malchukov & M. Richards (Eds.), Scales (pp. 397–436). Institut für Linguistik der Universität Leipzig., Bornkessel‐Schlesewsky, I. , Choudhary, K. K. , Witzlack‐Makarevich, A. , & Bickel, B. (2008). Bridging the gap between processing preferences and typological distributions: Initial evidence from the online comprehension of control constructions in Hindi. In A. Malchukov & M. Richards (Eds.), Scales (pp. 397–436). Institut für Linguistik der Universität Leipzig.
J. Culbertson, P. Smolensky, G. Legendre (2012)
Learning biases predict a word order universalCognition, 122
Jennifer Arnold, E. Kaiser, Jason Kahn, L. Kim (2013)
Information structure: linguistic, cognitive, and processing approaches.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science, 4 4
Martin Haspelmath (2019)
Differential place marking and differential object markingSTUF - Language Typology and Universals, 72
S. Kirby, H. Cornish, Kenny Smith (2008)
Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human languageProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105
Chigusa Kurumada, Scott Grimm (2019)
Predictability of meaning in grammatical encoding: Optional plural markingCognition, 191
( Kirby, S. , Cornish, H. , & Smith, K. (2008). Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(31), 10681–10686.)
Kirby, S. , Cornish, H. , & Smith, K. (2008). Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(31), 10681–10686.Kirby, S. , Cornish, H. , & Smith, K. (2008). Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(31), 10681–10686., Kirby, S. , Cornish, H. , & Smith, K. (2008). Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(31), 10681–10686.
( Tomlin, R. S. (1995). Focal attention, voice and word order: An experimental cross‐linguistic study. In P. Downing & M. Noonan (Eds.), Word order in discourse (pp. 517–556). John Benjamins Publishing Company.)
Tomlin, R. S. (1995). Focal attention, voice and word order: An experimental cross‐linguistic study. In P. Downing & M. Noonan (Eds.), Word order in discourse (pp. 517–556). John Benjamins Publishing Company.Tomlin, R. S. (1995). Focal attention, voice and word order: An experimental cross‐linguistic study. In P. Downing & M. Noonan (Eds.), Word order in discourse (pp. 517–556). John Benjamins Publishing Company., Tomlin, R. S. (1995). Focal attention, voice and word order: An experimental cross‐linguistic study. In P. Downing & M. Noonan (Eds.), Word order in discourse (pp. 517–556). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
( Bates, D. , Mächler, M. , Bolker, B. M. , & Walker, S. C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed‐effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48.)
Bates, D. , Mächler, M. , Bolker, B. M. , & Walker, S. C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed‐effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48.Bates, D. , Mächler, M. , Bolker, B. M. , & Walker, S. C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed‐effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48., Bates, D. , Mächler, M. , Bolker, B. M. , & Walker, S. C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed‐effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48.
S. Cristofaro (2013)
Languages across boundaries: Studies in memory of Anna Siewierska
John Pate, S. Goldwater (2015)
Talkers account for listener and channel characteristics to communicate efficientlyJournal of Memory and Language, 78
Jeanette Gundel (1988)
Universals of topic-comment structure
( Seržant, I. A. (2019). Weak universal forces: The discriminatory function of case in differential object marking systems. In K. Schmidtke‐Bode , N. Levshina , S. M. Michaelis & I. A. Seržant (Eds.), Explanation in Typology: Diachronic sources, functional motivations and the nature of the evidence (p. 149). Berlin: Language Science Press.)
Seržant, I. A. (2019). Weak universal forces: The discriminatory function of case in differential object marking systems. In K. Schmidtke‐Bode , N. Levshina , S. M. Michaelis & I. A. Seržant (Eds.), Explanation in Typology: Diachronic sources, functional motivations and the nature of the evidence (p. 149). Berlin: Language Science Press.Seržant, I. A. (2019). Weak universal forces: The discriminatory function of case in differential object marking systems. In K. Schmidtke‐Bode , N. Levshina , S. M. Michaelis & I. A. Seržant (Eds.), Explanation in Typology: Diachronic sources, functional motivations and the nature of the evidence (p. 149). Berlin: Language Science Press., Seržant, I. A. (2019). Weak universal forces: The discriminatory function of case in differential object marking systems. In K. Schmidtke‐Bode , N. Levshina , S. M. Michaelis & I. A. Seržant (Eds.), Explanation in Typology: Diachronic sources, functional motivations and the nature of the evidence (p. 149). Berlin: Language Science Press.
D. Bates, M. Machler, B. Bolker, Steven Walker (2014)
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4Journal of Statistical Software, 67
(1976)
Topic , pronoun and grammatical agreement
C. König (2008)
Case in Africa
( Pate, J. K. , & Goldwater, S. (2015). Talkers account for listener and channel characteristics to communicate efficiently. Journal of Memory and Language, 78, 1–17.)
Pate, J. K. , & Goldwater, S. (2015). Talkers account for listener and channel characteristics to communicate efficiently. Journal of Memory and Language, 78, 1–17.Pate, J. K. , & Goldwater, S. (2015). Talkers account for listener and channel characteristics to communicate efficiently. Journal of Memory and Language, 78, 1–17., Pate, J. K. , & Goldwater, S. (2015). Talkers account for listener and channel characteristics to communicate efficiently. Journal of Memory and Language, 78, 1–17.
( Witzlack‐Makarevich, A. , & Seržant, I. A. (2018). Differential argument marking: Patterns of variation. In I. A. Seržant & A. Witzlack‐Makarevich (Eds.), Diachronic typology of differential argument marking (pp. 1–40). Language Science Press.)
Witzlack‐Makarevich, A. , & Seržant, I. A. (2018). Differential argument marking: Patterns of variation. In I. A. Seržant & A. Witzlack‐Makarevich (Eds.), Diachronic typology of differential argument marking (pp. 1–40). Language Science Press.Witzlack‐Makarevich, A. , & Seržant, I. A. (2018). Differential argument marking: Patterns of variation. In I. A. Seržant & A. Witzlack‐Makarevich (Eds.), Diachronic typology of differential argument marking (pp. 1–40). Language Science Press., Witzlack‐Makarevich, A. , & Seržant, I. A. (2018). Differential argument marking: Patterns of variation. In I. A. Seržant & A. Witzlack‐Makarevich (Eds.), Diachronic typology of differential argument marking (pp. 1–40). Language Science Press.
M. Schouwstra, H. Swart (2014)
The semantic origins of word orderCognition, 131
( Kanwal, J. , Smith, K. , Culbertson, J. , & Kirby, S. (2017). Zipf's law of abbreviation and the principle of least effort: Language users optimise a miniature lexicon for efficient communication. Cognition, 165, 45–52.28494263)
Kanwal, J. , Smith, K. , Culbertson, J. , & Kirby, S. (2017). Zipf's law of abbreviation and the principle of least effort: Language users optimise a miniature lexicon for efficient communication. Cognition, 165, 45–52.28494263Kanwal, J. , Smith, K. , Culbertson, J. , & Kirby, S. (2017). Zipf's law of abbreviation and the principle of least effort: Language users optimise a miniature lexicon for efficient communication. Cognition, 165, 45–52.28494263, Kanwal, J. , Smith, K. , Culbertson, J. , & Kirby, S. (2017). Zipf's law of abbreviation and the principle of least effort: Language users optimise a miniature lexicon for efficient communication. Cognition, 165, 45–52.28494263
( Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort: An introduction to human ecology. Addison‐Wesley Press.)
Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort: An introduction to human ecology. Addison‐Wesley Press.Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort: An introduction to human ecology. Addison‐Wesley Press., Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort: An introduction to human ecology. Addison‐Wesley Press.
M. Dalrymple, I. Nikolaeva (2011)
Objects and Information Structure
Jasmeen Kanwal, Kenny Smith, J. Culbertson, S. Kirby (2017)
Zipf’s Law of Abbreviation and the Principle of Least Effort: Language users optimise a miniature lexicon for efficient communicationCognition, 165
John Bois (1987)
The Discourse Basis of ErgativityLanguage, 63
( Caughley, R. C. (1982). The syntax and morphology of the verb in Chepang. Australian National University.)
Caughley, R. C. (1982). The syntax and morphology of the verb in Chepang. Australian National University.Caughley, R. C. (1982). The syntax and morphology of the verb in Chepang. Australian National University., Caughley, R. C. (1982). The syntax and morphology of the verb in Chepang. Australian National University.
( Kay, M. , & Karttunen, L. (1984). Parsing a free word order language. In D. Dowty , L. Karttunen , & A. Zwicky (Eds.), Natural language parsing: Psychological, computational, and theoretical perspectives (pp. 279–306). Cambridge University Press.)
Kay, M. , & Karttunen, L. (1984). Parsing a free word order language. In D. Dowty , L. Karttunen , & A. Zwicky (Eds.), Natural language parsing: Psychological, computational, and theoretical perspectives (pp. 279–306). Cambridge University Press.Kay, M. , & Karttunen, L. (1984). Parsing a free word order language. In D. Dowty , L. Karttunen , & A. Zwicky (Eds.), Natural language parsing: Psychological, computational, and theoretical perspectives (pp. 279–306). Cambridge University Press., Kay, M. , & Karttunen, L. (1984). Parsing a free word order language. In D. Dowty , L. Karttunen , & A. Zwicky (Eds.), Natural language parsing: Psychological, computational, and theoretical perspectives (pp. 279–306). Cambridge University Press.
Vanessa Ferdinand, S. Kirby, Kenny Smith (2017)
The cognitive roots of regularization in languageCognition, 184
( Kurumada, C. , & Jaeger, T. F. (2015). Communicative efficiency in language production: Optional case‐marking in Japanese. Journal of Memory and Language, 83, 152–178.)
Kurumada, C. , & Jaeger, T. F. (2015). Communicative efficiency in language production: Optional case‐marking in Japanese. Journal of Memory and Language, 83, 152–178.Kurumada, C. , & Jaeger, T. F. (2015). Communicative efficiency in language production: Optional case‐marking in Japanese. Journal of Memory and Language, 83, 152–178., Kurumada, C. , & Jaeger, T. F. (2015). Communicative efficiency in language production: Optional case‐marking in Japanese. Journal of Memory and Language, 83, 152–178.
Harry Tily, T. Jaeger (2011)
Complementing quantitative typology with behavioral approaches: Evidence for typological universals, 15
M. Kay, L. Karttunen (1984)
Natural language parsing: Psychological, computational, and theoretical perspectives
( Fedzechkina, M. , Newport, E. L. , & Jaeger, T. F. (2017). Balancing effort and information transmission during language acquisition: Evidence from word order and case marking. Cognitive Science, 41(2), 416–446.26901374)
Fedzechkina, M. , Newport, E. L. , & Jaeger, T. F. (2017). Balancing effort and information transmission during language acquisition: Evidence from word order and case marking. Cognitive Science, 41(2), 416–446.26901374Fedzechkina, M. , Newport, E. L. , & Jaeger, T. F. (2017). Balancing effort and information transmission during language acquisition: Evidence from word order and case marking. Cognitive Science, 41(2), 416–446.26901374, Fedzechkina, M. , Newport, E. L. , & Jaeger, T. F. (2017). Balancing effort and information transmission during language acquisition: Evidence from word order and case marking. Cognitive Science, 41(2), 416–446.26901374
( Givón, T. (1991). Markedness in grammar: Distributional, communicative and cognitive correlates of syntactic structure. Studies in Language, 15(2), 335–370.)
Givón, T. (1991). Markedness in grammar: Distributional, communicative and cognitive correlates of syntactic structure. Studies in Language, 15(2), 335–370.Givón, T. (1991). Markedness in grammar: Distributional, communicative and cognitive correlates of syntactic structure. Studies in Language, 15(2), 335–370., Givón, T. (1991). Markedness in grammar: Distributional, communicative and cognitive correlates of syntactic structure. Studies in Language, 15(2), 335–370.
Robert Forkel (2009)
The World Atlas of Language Structures Online
( Greenberg, J. (1963). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of language (pp. 73–113). MIT Press.)
Greenberg, J. (1963). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of language (pp. 73–113). MIT Press.Greenberg, J. (1963). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of language (pp. 73–113). MIT Press., Greenberg, J. (1963). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of language (pp. 73–113). MIT Press.
Bickel B. (2014)
7
J. K. Gundel (1988)
Studies in syntactic typology
F. Principal (1965)
Australian institute of aboriginal studiesAnthropological Forum, 1
Karsten Schmidtke-Bode, N. Levshina, S. Michaelis, Ilja Seržant (2019)
Explanation in typology : Diachronic sources, functional motivations and the nature of the evidence
Maryia Fedzechkina, E. Newport, T. Jaeger (2017)
Balancing Effort and Information Transmission During Language Acquisition: Evidence From Word Order and Case MarkingCognitive science, 41 2
S. Cristofaro (2019)
Taking diachronic evidence seriously: Result-oriented vs. source-oriented explanations of typological universals
( Dryer, M. S. (2013). Order of subject, object and verb. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://wals.info/chapter/81 )
Dryer, M. S. (2013). Order of subject, object and verb. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://wals.info/chapter/81Dryer, M. S. (2013). Order of subject, object and verb. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://wals.info/chapter/81 , Dryer, M. S. (2013). Order of subject, object and verb. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://wals.info/chapter/81
D. Barr, R. Levy, Christoph Scheepers, Harry Tily (2013)
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.Journal of memory and language, 68 3
( Austin, P. (2001). Word order in a free word order language: The case of Jiwarli. In J. Simpson , D. Nash , M. Laughren , P. Austin , & B. Alpher (Eds.), Forty years on: Ken hale and Australian languages (pp. 205–225). Pacific Linguistics.)
Austin, P. (2001). Word order in a free word order language: The case of Jiwarli. In J. Simpson , D. Nash , M. Laughren , P. Austin , & B. Alpher (Eds.), Forty years on: Ken hale and Australian languages (pp. 205–225). Pacific Linguistics.Austin, P. (2001). Word order in a free word order language: The case of Jiwarli. In J. Simpson , D. Nash , M. Laughren , P. Austin , & B. Alpher (Eds.), Forty years on: Ken hale and Australian languages (pp. 205–225). Pacific Linguistics., Austin, P. (2001). Word order in a free word order language: The case of Jiwarli. In J. Simpson , D. Nash , M. Laughren , P. Austin , & B. Alpher (Eds.), Forty years on: Ken hale and Australian languages (pp. 205–225). Pacific Linguistics.
( Ferdinand, V. , Kirby, S. , & Smith, K. (2019). The cognitive roots of regularization in language. Cognition, 184, 53–68.30572180)
Ferdinand, V. , Kirby, S. , & Smith, K. (2019). The cognitive roots of regularization in language. Cognition, 184, 53–68.30572180Ferdinand, V. , Kirby, S. , & Smith, K. (2019). The cognitive roots of regularization in language. Cognition, 184, 53–68.30572180, Ferdinand, V. , Kirby, S. , & Smith, K. (2019). The cognitive roots of regularization in language. Cognition, 184, 53–68.30572180
Maryia Fedzechkina, T. Jaeger, E. Newport (2012)
Language learners restructure their input to facilitate efficient communicationProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109
E. Gibson, Richard Futrell, Steven Piantadosi, Isabelle Dautriche, Kyle Mahowald, Leon Bergen, R. Levy (2019)
How Efficiency Shapes Human LanguageTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 23
( Clark, H. H. , & Clark, E. V. (1977). Psychology and language: An introduction to psycholinguistics. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.)
Clark, H. H. , & Clark, E. V. (1977). Psychology and language: An introduction to psycholinguistics. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Clark, H. H. , & Clark, E. V. (1977). Psychology and language: An introduction to psycholinguistics. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich., Clark, H. H. , & Clark, E. V. (1977). Psychology and language: An introduction to psycholinguistics. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
( Schouwstra, M. , & De Swart, H. (2014). The semantic origins of word order. Cognition, 131(3), 431–436.24704967)
Schouwstra, M. , & De Swart, H. (2014). The semantic origins of word order. Cognition, 131(3), 431–436.24704967Schouwstra, M. , & De Swart, H. (2014). The semantic origins of word order. Cognition, 131(3), 431–436.24704967, Schouwstra, M. , & De Swart, H. (2014). The semantic origins of word order. Cognition, 131(3), 431–436.24704967
R. Caughley (1982)
The syntax and morphology of the verb in Chepang
Georg Bossong (1985)
Empirische Universalienforschung : differentielle Objektmarkierung in den neuiranischen Sprachen
( König, C. (2008). Case in Africa. Oxford University Press.)
König, C. (2008). Case in Africa. Oxford University Press.König, C. (2008). Case in Africa. Oxford University Press., König, C. (2008). Case in Africa. Oxford University Press.
E. A. Moravcsik (1978)
Universals of human language
T. Givón (1991)
Markedness in Grammar: Distributional, Communicative and Cognitive Correlates of Syntactic StructureStudies in Language, 15
(2022)
Appendix A Translation experiment
B. Comrie (1978)
Syntactic typology: Studies in the phenomenology of language
Jennifer Arnold (2016)
Explicit and Emergent Mechanisms of Information StatusTopics in cognitive science, 8 4
G. Bossong (1985)
Differentielle Objektmarkierung in den neuiranischen Sprachen
J. Culbertson, Julie Franck, G. Braquet, Magda Navarro, Inbal Arnon (2020)
A learning bias for word order harmony: Evidence from speakers of non-harmonic languagesCognition, 204
G. Iemmolo (2010)
Topicality and differential object marking: Evidence from Romance and beyond, 34
( Bossong, G. (1991). Differential object marking in Romance and beyond. In D. Kibbee & D. Wanner (Eds.), New analyses in Romance linguistics (pp. 143–170). Amsterdam: Benjamins.)
Bossong, G. (1991). Differential object marking in Romance and beyond. In D. Kibbee & D. Wanner (Eds.), New analyses in Romance linguistics (pp. 143–170). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Bossong, G. (1991). Differential object marking in Romance and beyond. In D. Kibbee & D. Wanner (Eds.), New analyses in Romance linguistics (pp. 143–170). Amsterdam: Benjamins., Bossong, G. (1991). Differential object marking in Romance and beyond. In D. Kibbee & D. Wanner (Eds.), New analyses in Romance linguistics (pp. 143–170). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
B. Bickel, Alena Witzlack-Makarevich, K. Choudhary, Matthias Schlesewsky, Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Kenny Smith (2015)
The Neurophysiology of Language Processing Shapes the Evolution of Grammar: Evidence from Case MarkingPLoS ONE, 10
Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (2018)
Differential argument marking: Patterns of variation
( Martin, A. , & Peperkamp, S. (2020). Phonetically natural rules benefit from a learning bias: A re‐examination of vowel harmony and disharmony. Phonology, 37(1), 65–90.)
Martin, A. , & Peperkamp, S. (2020). Phonetically natural rules benefit from a learning bias: A re‐examination of vowel harmony and disharmony. Phonology, 37(1), 65–90.Martin, A. , & Peperkamp, S. (2020). Phonetically natural rules benefit from a learning bias: A re‐examination of vowel harmony and disharmony. Phonology, 37(1), 65–90., Martin, A. , & Peperkamp, S. (2020). Phonetically natural rules benefit from a learning bias: A re‐examination of vowel harmony and disharmony. Phonology, 37(1), 65–90.
Joseph, H., Greenberg (1990)
Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful ElementsOn Language
Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, K. Choudhary, Alena Witzlack-Makarevich, B. Bickel (2008)
Bridging the gap between processing preferences and typological distributions: Initial evidence from the online comprehension of control constructions in Hindi
Michael Kashket (1986)
Parsing a Free-Word Order Language: Warlpiri
Betty Birner, G. Ward (2009)
Information Structure and Syntactic StructureLang. Linguistics Compass, 3
( Arnold, J. E. , Losongco, A. , Wasow, T. , & Ginstrom, R. (2000). Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering. Language, 76(1), 28–55.)
Arnold, J. E. , Losongco, A. , Wasow, T. , & Ginstrom, R. (2000). Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering. Language, 76(1), 28–55.Arnold, J. E. , Losongco, A. , Wasow, T. , & Ginstrom, R. (2000). Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering. Language, 76(1), 28–55., Arnold, J. E. , Losongco, A. , Wasow, T. , & Ginstrom, R. (2000). Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering. Language, 76(1), 28–55.
( Dalrymple, M. , & Nikolaeva, I. (2011). Objects and information structure.)
Dalrymple, M. , & Nikolaeva, I. (2011). Objects and information structure.Dalrymple, M. , & Nikolaeva, I. (2011). Objects and information structure., Dalrymple, M. , & Nikolaeva, I. (2011). Objects and information structure.
B. Bickel, Alena Witzlack-Makarevich, Taras Zakharko (2013)
Typological evidence against universal effects of referential scales on case alignment *
( Raz, S. (1983). Tigre grammar and texts. Undena Publications.)
Raz, S. (1983). Tigre grammar and texts. Undena Publications.Raz, S. (1983). Tigre grammar and texts. Undena Publications., Raz, S. (1983). Tigre grammar and texts. Undena Publications.
G. Bossong (1991)
Differential Object Marking in Romance and Beyond
M. Clair, P. Monaghan, Michael Ramscar (2009)
Relationships Between Language Structure and Language Learning: The Suffixing Preference and Grammatical CategorizationCognitive science, 33 7
Gerhard Jäger (2007)
Evolutionary Game Theory and Typology: A Case StudyLanguage, 83
Cognitive Science - A Multidisciplinary Journal – Wiley
Published: Mar 1, 2022
Keywords: Learning biases; Artificial language learning; Information structure; Language universals; Differential object marking
You can share this free article with as many people as you like with the url below! We hope you enjoy this feature!
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.