Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Idea of the Ministerial Department: Bentham, Mill and Bagehot

The Idea of the Ministerial Department: Bentham, Mill and Bagehot Footnotes 1 cf. Sir J. H. Woods , Public Administration , Vol. 26 , 1948 , pp. 85 – 91 . J. R. Simpson, “Organising the Larger Units”, British Management Review reprint, July 1949. 2 cf. J. Morley , Life of Gladstone , London, 1908 ed., Vol. II , pp. 51 – 4 , for the Ayrton case when ministerial responsibility received a precise exposition and a supreme tribute. 3 F. M. G. Willson , Public Administration , Vol. 33 , 1955 , pp. 43 – 58 . S. E. Finer , Public Administration , Vol. 30 , 1952 , pp. 329 – 60 . 4 A. C. Benson and Viscount Esher (eds.), Letters of Queen Victoria 1837–1861, London, 1908, Vol. I, pp. 106–8, letter of 25 Feb. 1838. 5 J. Bowring (ed.), The Works of Jeremy Bentham , Edinburgh, 1843 , Vol. IV , p. 376 . 6 ibid. , p. 316. 7 ibid. , Vol. IX, Constitutional Code, Book II, Ch. IX, S. III, Arts. 3 and 7 and S. XXV, Art. 26. For a very different view see W. Blackstone , Commentaries , London, 1803 , Vol. II , p. 36 , or L. V. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Australian Journal of Politics and History Wiley

The Idea of the Ministerial Department: Bentham, Mill and Bagehot

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/the-idea-of-the-ministerial-department-bentham-mill-and-bagehot-lC8uwaJylw

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 1957 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
ISSN
0004-9522
eISSN
1467-8497
DOI
10.1111/j.1467-8497.1957.tb00368.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Footnotes 1 cf. Sir J. H. Woods , Public Administration , Vol. 26 , 1948 , pp. 85 – 91 . J. R. Simpson, “Organising the Larger Units”, British Management Review reprint, July 1949. 2 cf. J. Morley , Life of Gladstone , London, 1908 ed., Vol. II , pp. 51 – 4 , for the Ayrton case when ministerial responsibility received a precise exposition and a supreme tribute. 3 F. M. G. Willson , Public Administration , Vol. 33 , 1955 , pp. 43 – 58 . S. E. Finer , Public Administration , Vol. 30 , 1952 , pp. 329 – 60 . 4 A. C. Benson and Viscount Esher (eds.), Letters of Queen Victoria 1837–1861, London, 1908, Vol. I, pp. 106–8, letter of 25 Feb. 1838. 5 J. Bowring (ed.), The Works of Jeremy Bentham , Edinburgh, 1843 , Vol. IV , p. 376 . 6 ibid. , p. 316. 7 ibid. , Vol. IX, Constitutional Code, Book II, Ch. IX, S. III, Arts. 3 and 7 and S. XXV, Art. 26. For a very different view see W. Blackstone , Commentaries , London, 1803 , Vol. II , p. 36 , or L. V.

Journal

Australian Journal of Politics and HistoryWiley

Published: Nov 1, 1957

There are no references for this article.