Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

THE EXILE IN THE LITERATURE OF THE INTERTESTAMENTAL PERIOD

THE EXILE IN THE LITERATURE OF THE INTERTESTAMENTAL PERIOD Footnotes 1 P.R. Ackroyd, Exile and Ristoration (London, 1968), pp.237–47. I would like to thank Professor Ackroyd for his characteristic kindness in reading this paper and making several very helpful comments on it. He is not, of course, in any way to be held responsible for the views expressed here. 2 Cf. C.F. Whitley, ‘The Term Seventy Years Captivity’, VT 4(1954), pp.65–8. The setting of a definite end to the exile in 29: 10–14 contrasts with the exhortation of vv. 4–9 to settle in Babylon and may well represent a reinterpretation of the original prophecy (cf. Ackroyd, Exile , p.56; for a different view cf. W. Rudolph, Jeremia [HAT 12, Tübingen, 3 1968], pp.183–5). On the other hand there are good grounds for regarding 25: 12 as secondary (so e.g. Rudolph, p.160), while the mention of 70 years at the end of 25: 11 has probably been inserted from 29: 10 by a redactor. On these two passages see also P.R. Ackroyd, ‘Two Old Testament Historical Problems of the Early Persian Period. B. The “Seventy Year” Period’, JNES 17(1958), pp.23–7. 3 Cf. also Josephus, A.J. XI, 1, 1. 4 J.A. Montgomery, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Heythrop Journal Wiley

THE EXILE IN THE LITERATURE OF THE INTERTESTAMENTAL PERIOD

KNIBB, MICHAEL A.
The Heythrop Journal , Volume 17 (3) – Jul 1, 1976
Download PDF
20 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/the-exile-in-the-literature-of-the-intertestamental-period-xByaYne7lC

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
ISSN
0018-1196
eISSN
1468-2265
DOI
10.1111/j.1468-2265.1976.tb00590.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Footnotes 1 P.R. Ackroyd, Exile and Ristoration (London, 1968), pp.237–47. I would like to thank Professor Ackroyd for his characteristic kindness in reading this paper and making several very helpful comments on it. He is not, of course, in any way to be held responsible for the views expressed here. 2 Cf. C.F. Whitley, ‘The Term Seventy Years Captivity’, VT 4(1954), pp.65–8. The setting of a definite end to the exile in 29: 10–14 contrasts with the exhortation of vv. 4–9 to settle in Babylon and may well represent a reinterpretation of the original prophecy (cf. Ackroyd, Exile , p.56; for a different view cf. W. Rudolph, Jeremia [HAT 12, Tübingen, 3 1968], pp.183–5). On the other hand there are good grounds for regarding 25: 12 as secondary (so e.g. Rudolph, p.160), while the mention of 70 years at the end of 25: 11 has probably been inserted from 29: 10 by a redactor. On these two passages see also P.R. Ackroyd, ‘Two Old Testament Historical Problems of the Early Persian Period. B. The “Seventy Year” Period’, JNES 17(1958), pp.23–7. 3 Cf. also Josephus, A.J. XI, 1, 1. 4 J.A. Montgomery, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the

Journal

The Heythrop Journal – Wiley

Published: Jul 1, 1976

There are no references for this article.