Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

THE ELASTICITY OF DEMAND FOR EXPORTS: A REPLY

THE ELASTICITY OF DEMAND FOR EXPORTS: A REPLY Airstralian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 23, No. 1 (April 1979). p~. 67-68. THE ELASTICITY OF DEMAND FOR EXPORTS: A REPLY C. D. THROSBY and D. J. S. RUTLEDGE Mucquarie University We welcome the comments of Scobie and Johnson (hereafter S-J) on demand elasticities for Australian farm exports, although we feel that, in their zeal to press their case for high elasticities, they have read more into our paper than is actually there. At issue is our specification of a joint price/quantity system in the external sector of our model, Our equations (8) to (10) hypothesise that export prices for each of the farm commodity groups we studied are a function, in part, of Australian exports of those commodities. Ye rationalised inclusion of this variable and these equations on the grounds that Australia might exercise ‘significant market power’ with respect to some of the products involved. In fact ‘significant’ rather overstates the case here; we would argue that sufficient justification for inclusion of equations (8) to (10) in a model like this is simpIy that the world demand elasticity for Australian exports of the product groups in question might be less than infinite, not that it necessarily has to http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Australian Journal of Agricultural Resource Economics Wiley

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/the-elasticity-of-demand-for-exports-a-reply-b5B8IfO3Ap

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
ISSN
1364-985X
eISSN
1467-8489
DOI
10.1111/j.1467-8489.1979.tb00230.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Airstralian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 23, No. 1 (April 1979). p~. 67-68. THE ELASTICITY OF DEMAND FOR EXPORTS: A REPLY C. D. THROSBY and D. J. S. RUTLEDGE Mucquarie University We welcome the comments of Scobie and Johnson (hereafter S-J) on demand elasticities for Australian farm exports, although we feel that, in their zeal to press their case for high elasticities, they have read more into our paper than is actually there. At issue is our specification of a joint price/quantity system in the external sector of our model, Our equations (8) to (10) hypothesise that export prices for each of the farm commodity groups we studied are a function, in part, of Australian exports of those commodities. Ye rationalised inclusion of this variable and these equations on the grounds that Australia might exercise ‘significant market power’ with respect to some of the products involved. In fact ‘significant’ rather overstates the case here; we would argue that sufficient justification for inclusion of equations (8) to (10) in a model like this is simpIy that the world demand elasticity for Australian exports of the product groups in question might be less than infinite, not that it necessarily has to

Journal

The Australian Journal of Agricultural Resource EconomicsWiley

Published: Apr 1, 1979

There are no references for this article.