Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Murdock, B. Bennet (1962)
The serial position effect of free recallJournal of Experimental Psychology, 64
Steve Charman, Jon Carbone, Seyram Kekessie, Daniella Villalba (2016)
Evidence Evaluation and Evidence Integration in Legal Decision‐Making: Order of Evidence Presentation as a Moderator of Context EffectsApplied Cognitive Psychology, 30
Victoria Estrada-Reynolds, J. Gray, Narina Nuñez (2015)
Information Integration Theory, Juror Bias, and Sentence Recommendations Captured Over Time in a Capital TrialApplied Cognitive Psychology, 29
H. Kelley (1950)
The warm-cold variable in first impressions of persons.Journal of personality, 18 4
B. McAuliff, Tejah Duckworth (2010)
I Spy with My Little Eye: Jurors’ Detection of Internal Validity Threats in Expert EvidenceLaw and Human Behavior, 34
N. Anderson (1959)
Test of a model for opinion change.Journal of abnormal and social psychology, 59
Raluca Enescu, A. Kuhn (2012)
Serial effects of evidence on legal decision-makingEuropean Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 4
A. Furnham (1986)
The Robustness of the Recency Effect: Studies Using Legal EvidenceJournal of General Psychology, 113
L. Dahl, Ae Brimacombe, A. Lindsay, L. Cutler, Dahl, C. Brimacombe, A. Lindsay (2009)
Investigating Investigators: How Presentation Order Influences Participant–Investigators’ Interpretations of Eyewitness Identification and Alibi EvidenceLaw and Human Behavior, 33
H. Weld, M. Roff (1938)
A study in the formation of opinion based upon legal evidence.American Journal of Psychology, 51
Heather Price, L. Dahl (2014)
Order and Strength Matter for Evaluation of Alibi and Eyewitness EvidenceApplied Cognitive Psychology, 28
Angela Jones, M. Kovera (2015)
A Demonstrative Helps Opposing Expert Testimony Sensitize Jurors to the Validity of Scientific EvidenceJournal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 15
Gabriele Paolacci, Jesse Chandler (2014)
Inside the TurkCurrent Directions in Psychological Science, 23
R. Hogarth, H. Einhorn (1992)
Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment modelCognitive Psychology, 24
Jacqueline Chorn, M. Kovera (2019)
Variations in reliability and validity do not influence judge, attorney, and mock juror decisions about psychological expert evidence.Law and human behavior
Joel Lieberman, Courtney Carrell, Terance Miethe, D. Krauss (2008)
Gold versus platinum: Do jurors recognize the superiority and limitations of DNA evidence compared to other types of forensic evidence?Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 14
Steve Charman (2013)
The forensic confirmation bias: A problem of evidence integration, not just evidence evaluationJournal of applied research in memory and cognition, 2
S. Kassin, I. Dror, Jeff Kukucka (2013)
The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions.Journal of applied research in memory and cognition, 2
A. Luchins (1958)
Definitiveness of Impression and Primacy-Recency in CommunicationsJournal of Social Psychology, 48
Michael Buhrmester, Sanaz Talaifar, S. Gosling (2018)
An Evaluation of Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, Its Rapid Rise, and Its Effective UsePerspectives on Psychological Science, 13
G. Paolacci, J. Chandler (2014)
Inside the turk: Understanding mechanical Turk as a participant pool, 23
L. Dahl, Heather Price (2012)
"He Couldn't Have Done It, He Was With Me!": The Impact of Alibi Witness Age and RelationshipApplied Cognitive Psychology, 26
S. Asch (1946)
Forming impressions of personality.Journal of abnormal psychology, 41
Kimberly Schweitzer, Narina Nuñez (2018)
What Evidence Matters to Jurors? The Prevalence and Importance of Different Homicide Trial Evidence to Mock JurorsPsychiatry, Psychology and Law, 25
B. Bornstein (2004)
The impact of different types of expert scientific testimony on mock jurors’ liability verdictsPsychology, Crime & Law, 10
A. Tversky, D. Kahneman (1974)
Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, 185
Lisa Smith, R. Bull, R. Holliday (2011)
Understanding Juror Perceptions of Forensic Evidence: Investigating the Impact of Case Context on Perceptions of Forensic Evidence StrengthJournal of Forensic Sciences, 56
In a series of studies, the effect of evidence order with strongly and weakly probative evidence was examined. In studies 1a, 1b, and 2, participants read a homicide trial containing four pieces of evidence (two strongly probative, two weakly) presented in differing orders and reported their verdicts. In Study 1a and 1b, fingerprint evidence and a video confession were strongly probative, while DNA evidence and eyewitness testimony were not. In Study 2, DNA and video confession evidence were strongly probative, but fingerprint evidence and eyewitness testimony were not. Across studies, results indicated recency effects when the last piece of evidence was strongly probative, with more guilty verdicts compared to when the last piece of evidence was weakly probative. Study 3 utilized a different trial scenario and six pieces of evidence to further test for a primacy effect. Results again indicated support for a recency effect, with no primacy effects found.
Applied Cognitive Psychology – Wiley
Published: Nov 1, 2021
Keywords: evidence presentation order; juror decision‐making; primacy and recency effects; probative value of evidence
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.