Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Dwight Perkins (1985)
Rural development in China
J. Lin (1991)
Education and Innovation Adoption in Agriculture: Evidence from Hybrid Rice in ChinaAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73
J. Fei, G. Ranis, Shirley Kuo (1978)
Growth and the Family Distribution of Income by Factor ComponentsQuarterly Journal of Economics, 92
Harry Blair, Keith Griffin (1976)
The Political Economy of Agrarian Change. An Essay on Green Revolution.Pacific Affairs, 49
G. He (1984)
The Economics of hybrid rice production in China
J. Mellor (1978)
Food Price Policy and Income Distribution in Low-Income CountriesEconomic Development and Cultural Change, 27
M. Lipton, R. Longhurst (1990)
New seeds and poor people
S. Hymer, S. Resnick (1969)
A Model of an Agrarian Economy with Nonagricultural ActivitiesThe American Economic Review, 59
Dennis Anderson, M. Leiserson (1980)
Rural Nonfarm Employment in Developing CountriesEconomic Development and Cultural Change, 28
R. Naylor (1993)
Modern Rice Technology and Income Distribution in AsiaThe Journal of Asian Studies, 53
J. Lin (1991)
The household responsibility system reform and the adoption of hybrid rice in ChinaJournal of Development Economics, 36
R. Shand (1986)
Off-farm employment in the development of rural Asia : papers presented at a conference held in Chiang Mai, Thailand, 23 to 26 August 1983
Y. Hayami, R. Herdt (1977)
Market Price Effects of Technological Change on Income Distribution in Semisubsistence AgricultureAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 59
R. Grabowski (1979)
The Implications of an Induced Innovation ModelEconomic Development and Cultural Change, 27
J. Lin (1995)
Endowments, Technology, and Factor Markets: A Natural Experiment of Induced Institutional Innovation from China's Rural ReformAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77
R. Evenson (1978)
Time Allocation in Rural Philippine HouseholdsAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 60
This article applies a general equilibrium model to analyse the impact of new rice technology on household income and uses agricultural household survey data from China to test the implications of this model. It is shown that, when a new rice technology becomes available, the adopting household will reallocate resources to increase rice production and reduce the production of other goods. Meanwhile, the non‐adopting households will do the opposite. Thus, the income from rice becomes increasingly concentrated in the adopting households and income from non‐rice becomes increasingly concentrated in the non‐adopting households. If only one source of income is examined, the introduction of new rice technology increases the inequality of income distribution in rural areas. But, if the total household income is examined, the distributional inequality is mitigated.
The Australian Journal of Agricultural Resource Economics – Wiley
Published: Jun 1, 1999
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.