Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

TATIAN'S DEPENDENCE UPON APOCRYPHAL TRADITIONS

TATIAN'S DEPENDENCE UPON APOCRYPHAL TRADITIONS T W O M U T U A L L Y EXCLUSIVE C O N C L U S I O N S There is no consensus regarding the sources employed by Tatian, except perhaps that Eusebius erred when he wrote that Tatian compiled his harmony from ‘the gospels’ and called it the Diatessaron: . . . b TmtWbg WUhqElh TtVa K a i a w a y w y i u O 016’6 v W g T 6 U EhyyEAhV w&iS, ~b 6th -nuohpwv TOGTO 1~poowu6paoau.~ Rufinus’s translation, moreover, accentuated the error : ‘Tatianus conlationem quandam faciens euangeliorum nescio quomodo conposuit See, for example, L. Leloir, Le Timoignage d’Ephrem sur le Diatessaron (CSCO 227, Subs. 19 [Louvain, 1962]), pp. 105-7, 160, 190, 228, 235; parallels with Gospel of Thomas (hereafter GThqm): pp. 130f., 153, 164f., 183, 201, 213; idem, Ephrem de Nisibe: Commentaire de I’Evangile concordant ou Diatessaron (SC 121 [Paris, 1966]), pp. 14f. See also H. S. Pelser, ‘The Origin of the Ancient Syriac New TestamentTextsA Historical Study’, in De Fructu Oris Sui (Essays in Honour of A. van Selms, ed. I. H. Eybers and others [Leiden, 1971]), esp. pp. 152, 162. * See esp. G. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Heythrop Journal Wiley

TATIAN'S DEPENDENCE UPON APOCRYPHAL TRADITIONS

CHARLESWORTH, JAMES H.
The Heythrop Journal , Volume 15 (1) – Jan 1, 1974
Download PDF
13 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/tatian-s-dependence-upon-apocryphal-traditions-f1nPPfe1J9

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 1974 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
ISSN
0018-1196
eISSN
1468-2265
DOI
10.1111/j.1468-2265.1974.tb00402.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

T W O M U T U A L L Y EXCLUSIVE C O N C L U S I O N S There is no consensus regarding the sources employed by Tatian, except perhaps that Eusebius erred when he wrote that Tatian compiled his harmony from ‘the gospels’ and called it the Diatessaron: . . . b TmtWbg WUhqElh TtVa K a i a w a y w y i u O 016’6 v W g T 6 U EhyyEAhV w&iS, ~b 6th -nuohpwv TOGTO 1~poowu6paoau.~ Rufinus’s translation, moreover, accentuated the error : ‘Tatianus conlationem quandam faciens euangeliorum nescio quomodo conposuit See, for example, L. Leloir, Le Timoignage d’Ephrem sur le Diatessaron (CSCO 227, Subs. 19 [Louvain, 1962]), pp. 105-7, 160, 190, 228, 235; parallels with Gospel of Thomas (hereafter GThqm): pp. 130f., 153, 164f., 183, 201, 213; idem, Ephrem de Nisibe: Commentaire de I’Evangile concordant ou Diatessaron (SC 121 [Paris, 1966]), pp. 14f. See also H. S. Pelser, ‘The Origin of the Ancient Syriac New TestamentTextsA Historical Study’, in De Fructu Oris Sui (Essays in Honour of A. van Selms, ed. I. H. Eybers and others [Leiden, 1971]), esp. pp. 152, 162. * See esp. G.

Journal

The Heythrop Journal – Wiley

Published: Jan 1, 1974

There are no references for this article.