Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Benke (1990)
A Perspective on America's Vanishing StreamsJournal of the North American Benthological Society, 9
B. McGill, R. Etienne, J. Gray, David Alonso, Marti Anderson, Habtamu Benecha, M. Dornelas, B. Enquist, Jessica Green, F. He, A. Hurlbert, A. Magurran, P. Marquet, B. Maurer, A. Ostling, C. Soykan, K. Ugland, E. White (2007)
Species abundance distributions: moving beyond single prediction theories to integration within an ecological framework.Ecology letters, 10 10
M. Bain, J. Finn, H. Booke (1988)
Streamflow regulation and fish community structureEcology, 69
G. Bakus, W. Stillwell, Susan Latter, M. Wallerstein (1982)
Decision making: With applications for environmental managementEnvironmental Management, 6
Robert Miller, M. Trautman (1958)
FISHES OF OHIOJournal of Wildlife Management, 22
Thomas Dietz, E. Ostrom, P. Stern (2003)
The Struggle to Govern the CommonsScience, 302
M. Bain (1987)
Structured Decision Making in Fisheries Management: Trout Fishing Regulations on the Au Sable River, MichiganNorth American Journal of Fisheries Management, 7
B. Mandelbrot (1984)
Fractal Geometry of Nature
P. Marquet (2002)
Of Predators, Prey, and Power LawsScience, 295
P. Marquet, R. Quiñones, S. Abades, Fabio Labra, M. Tognelli, M. Arim, M. Rivadeneira (2005)
Scaling and power-laws in ecological systemsJournal of Experimental Biology, 208
T. Young, D. Petersen, J. Clary (2005)
The ecology of restoration: historical links, emerging issues and unexplored realmsEcology Letters, 8
B. McGill (2003)
Strong and weak tests of macroecological theoryOikos, 102
E. Bernhardt, M. Palmer, J. Allan, G. Alexander, Katie Barnas, S. Brooks, J. Carr, S. Clayton, C. Dahm, J. Follstad-Shah, D. Galat, D. Galat, S. Gloss, P. Goodwin, D. Hart, B. Hassett, R. Jenkinson, S. Katz, G. Kondolf, P. Lake, Rebecca Lave, J. Meyer, T. O'donnell, L. Pagano, B. Powell, E. Sudduth (2005)
Synthesizing U.S. River Restoration EffortsScience, 308
Z. Bowen, M. Freeman (1998)
Sampling Effort and Estimates of Species Richness Based on Prepositioned Area Electrofisher SamplesNorth American Journal of Fisheries Management, 18
G. West, G. West, James Brown, James Brown, B. Enquist, B. Enquist (1999)
The fourth dimension of life: fractal geometry and allometric scaling of organisms.Science, 284 5420
(2000)
Signs Of Life: How Complexity Pervades Biology
P. Parasiewicz (2008)
Application of MesoHABSIM and target fish community approaches to restoration of the Quinebaug River, Connecticut and Massachusetts, USARiver Research and Applications, 24
J. Stoddard, D. Larsen, C. Hawkins, Richard Johnson, R. Norris (2005)
Setting expectations for the ecological condition of streams: the concept of reference condition.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 16 4
W. Whitworth, P. Berrien, W. Keller (1996)
Freshwater Fishes of Connecticut
R. Bailey, D. Lee, C. Gilbert, C. Hocutt, R. Jenkins, D. McAllister, J. Stauffer (1980)
Atlas of North American Freshwater Fishes
Bain Bain, Finn Finn (1991)
Analysis of microhabitat use by fish: investigator effect and investigator biasRivers, 2
Michael Barton, B. Burr, M. Warren (1987)
Distributional Atlas of Kentucky FishesCopeia, 1987
P. Bak (1996)
How Nature Works
O. Houck (2003)
Tales from a Troubled Marriage: Science and Law in Environmental PolicyScience, 302
S. Connolly, T. Hughes, D. Bellwood, R. Karlson (2005)
Community Structure of Corals and Reef Fishes at Multiple ScalesScience, 309
G. Becker (1983)
Fishes of Wisconsin
J. Gray (1989)
Effects of environmental stress on species rich assemblagesBiological Journal of The Linnean Society, 37
W. Pflieger (1997)
The Fishes of Missouri
M. Palmer, E. Bernhardt, E. Chornesky, S. Collins, A. Dobson, C. Duke, B. Gold, R. Jacobson, S. Kingsland, Rhonda Kranz, Michael Mappin, M. Martínez, F. Micheli, J. Morse, M. Pace, M. Pascual, Stephen Palumbi, O. Reichman, A. Simons, A. Townsend, M. Turner (2004)
Ecology for a Crowded PlanetScience, 304
R. Jenkins, C. Smith (1986)
The Inland Fishes of New York State
M. Meador, D. Carlisle (2009)
Predictive Models for Fish Assemblages in Eastern U.S. Streams: Implications for Assessing BiodiversityTransactions of The American Fisheries Society, 138
M. Bain, M. Meixler (2008)
A target fish community to guide river restorationRiver Research and Applications, 24
F. Preston (1948)
The Commonness, And Rarity, of SpeciesEcology, 29
B. Burr, M. Warren, R. Jenkins, N. Burkhead (1994)
Freshwater Fishes of Virginia
W. Scott, E. Crossman (1974)
Freshwater fishes of Canada
M. Palmer, E. Bernhardt, J. Allan, P. Lake, G. Alexander, S. Brooks, J. Carr, S. Clayton, C. Dahm, J. Shah, D. Galat, S. Loss, P. Goodwin, D. Hart, B. Hassett, R. Jenkinson, G. Kondolf, R. Lave, J. Meyer, T. O'donnell, L. Pagano, E. Sudduth (2005)
Standards for ecologically successful river restorationJournal of Applied Ecology, 42
D. Faber, D. McAllister (1979)
Development of Fishes of the Mid-Atlantic Bight. An Atlas of egg, larval and juvenile stages.Wsq: Women's Studies Quarterly, 36
W. Edwards (1977)
How to Use Multiattribute Utility Measurement for Social DecisionmakingIEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 7
A. Allen, James Brown, James Gillooly (2002)
Global Biodiversity, Biochemical Kinetics, and the Energetic-Equivalence RuleScience, 297
P. Kareiva, Sean Watts, R. McDonald, T. Boucher (2007)
Domesticated Nature: Shaping Landscapes and Ecosystems for Human WelfareScience, 316
Bain (1991)
57Rivers, 2
M. Monaco, D. Nelson (2000)
National overview and evolution of NOAA's Estuarine Living Marine Resources (ELMR) Program / David M. Nelson and Mark E. Monaco.
R. Hobbs (2007)
Setting Effective and Realistic Restoration Goals: Key Directions for ResearchRestoration Ecology, 15
M. Bain, J. Finn, H. Booke (1985)
A Quantitative Method for Sampling Riverine Microhabitats by ElectrofishingNorth American Journal of Fisheries Management, 5
F. Preston (1960)
Time and Space and the Variation of SpeciesEcology, 41
G. Petts (2009)
Instream Flow Science For Sustainable River Management 1JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 45
Edwards Edwards (1977)
How to use multiattribute utility measurement for social decisionmaking. IEEE TransSyst. Man. Cybern., 7
S. Fennessy (1993)
Review of: Restoration of aquatic ecosystems: Science, technology, and public policy: Committee on Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems-Science, Technology, and Public Policy, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DCEcological Engineering, 2
D. Berg, J. Levinton (1985)
The biology of the Hudson-Raritan estuary, with emphasis on fishes
Young-Dae Choi, V. Temperton, E. Allen, A. Grootjans, M. Halassy, R. Hobbs, A. Naeth, K. Torok (2008)
Ecological restoration for future sustainability in a changing environment, 15
Summary A set of methods are developed and demonstrated for setting clear and measurable fish community targets for environmental restoration in contemporary waterways. Two case studies illustrate the application and value of these methods: a small northeast United States river and the Hudson River estuary in New York City. A target fish community can be used to diagnose impediments to a desired fish fauna, define needed restoration activities, and identify precisely the fish community for restoration. A target fish community defines species composition and community proportions by species. In the small river case, observed fish community had underrepresented species that were mostly fluvial fishes and overly abundant species that were mostly habitat generalists or lentic oriented species. Results indicated flowing water habitat improvement was the highest priority. The estuary case defined species composition and community proportions for shorelines in New York City. While this estuarine ecosystem had a high diversity of fishes and few missing species, the shoreline community was determined to be highly biased toward fishes using open pelagic waters. Departures from target conditions were used to define clear and practical restoration needs in this intensely urbanized waterway: shallow shoreline waters with cover. Integrating restoration policy, objective zoogeography analyses, and theory‐based parameters of community structure yields restoration specifications that are future oriented, meaningful to the public, and scientifically justified.
Journal of Applied Ichthyology – Wiley
Published: Dec 1, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.