Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Staff Perceptions of Communication with a Partner who is Intellectually Disabled

Staff Perceptions of Communication with a Partner who is Intellectually Disabled Nineteen staff employed in small‐scale residential and day services were video‐recorded interacting with a client whom they knew well in two different contexts (selected from three possible contexts: either social, consultative or task‐related). Prior to each session, staff rated themselves and the clients on how likely they were to use a range of communication acts. These ratings were repeated after the session and the video‐recordings were rated similarly by two speech and language therapists. Although staff were able to predict and adapt their communications across the three contexts, their perceptions of communication were dominated by the use or non‐use of a ‘teaching’ strategy; that is one based around corrections, giving instructions and reinforcements, and the use of pointing and touch. Staff were less able to predict and assess the use of other verbal acts, such as commenting, and non‐verbal signals such as facial expressions and gestures both by themselves and by the clients. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities Wiley

Staff Perceptions of Communication with a Partner who is Intellectually Disabled

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/staff-perceptions-of-communication-with-a-partner-who-is-ftGsXysnde

References (10)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
1999 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
ISSN
1360-2322
eISSN
1468-3148
DOI
10.1111/j.1468-3148.1999.tb00077.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Nineteen staff employed in small‐scale residential and day services were video‐recorded interacting with a client whom they knew well in two different contexts (selected from three possible contexts: either social, consultative or task‐related). Prior to each session, staff rated themselves and the clients on how likely they were to use a range of communication acts. These ratings were repeated after the session and the video‐recordings were rated similarly by two speech and language therapists. Although staff were able to predict and adapt their communications across the three contexts, their perceptions of communication were dominated by the use or non‐use of a ‘teaching’ strategy; that is one based around corrections, giving instructions and reinforcements, and the use of pointing and touch. Staff were less able to predict and assess the use of other verbal acts, such as commenting, and non‐verbal signals such as facial expressions and gestures both by themselves and by the clients.

Journal

Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual DisabilitiesWiley

Published: Sep 1, 1999

There are no references for this article.