Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Spann's Universalism — The Foundation of the Neoromantie Theory of Corporative State

Spann's Universalism — The Foundation of the Neoromantie Theory of Corporative State Footnotes 1 . E. Molden, Das Wort hat Österreich. Beiträge zur Geschichte der zweiten Republik (Wien, 1953), quoted in W. Heinrich, et al., Othmar Spann — Leben und Werk, Gesamtausgabe, Band 21 (Graz, 1979), 17. 2 . Johnston sees in Spann the continuation of Bohemian Catholicism and the heir of Leibniz, Bolzano, and the Herbartians. W.M. Johnston, The Austrian Mind: An Intellectual and Social History 1848–1938 (Berkeley, 1972), 312–15. He credits the Austrian social philosopher, Karl Pribram, with the clarification of philosophical distinction between individualism and universalism in Die Entstehung der individualistischen Sozialphilosophie (Leipzig, 1912). It should be noted that Spann had contrasted individualism as a source of the individual ethos with universalism as an independent ethos of the community for the first time in 'Der logische Aufbau der Nationalökonomie und ihr Verhältnis zur Psychologie und zu den Naturwissenschaften', in Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 64, 1908, 44 et seq., but he used these concepts as social theories for the first time in his Kurzgefasstes System der Gesellschaftslehre (Berlin, 1914), 232. 3 . O. Spann, Gesellschaftslehre, Gesamtausgabe, Band 4 (Graz, 1969), 127. 4 . Spann, however, held that his universalism is not the antithesis of individualism in the http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Australian Journal of Politics and History Wiley

Spann's Universalism — The Foundation of the Neoromantie Theory of Corporative State

Download PDF
14 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/spann-s-universalism-the-foundation-of-the-neoromantie-theory-of-j9BQu50bk2

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
ISSN
0004-9522
eISSN
1467-8497
DOI
10.1111/j.1467-8497.1985.tb00331.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Footnotes 1 . E. Molden, Das Wort hat Österreich. Beiträge zur Geschichte der zweiten Republik (Wien, 1953), quoted in W. Heinrich, et al., Othmar Spann — Leben und Werk, Gesamtausgabe, Band 21 (Graz, 1979), 17. 2 . Johnston sees in Spann the continuation of Bohemian Catholicism and the heir of Leibniz, Bolzano, and the Herbartians. W.M. Johnston, The Austrian Mind: An Intellectual and Social History 1848–1938 (Berkeley, 1972), 312–15. He credits the Austrian social philosopher, Karl Pribram, with the clarification of philosophical distinction between individualism and universalism in Die Entstehung der individualistischen Sozialphilosophie (Leipzig, 1912). It should be noted that Spann had contrasted individualism as a source of the individual ethos with universalism as an independent ethos of the community for the first time in 'Der logische Aufbau der Nationalökonomie und ihr Verhältnis zur Psychologie und zu den Naturwissenschaften', in Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 64, 1908, 44 et seq., but he used these concepts as social theories for the first time in his Kurzgefasstes System der Gesellschaftslehre (Berlin, 1914), 232. 3 . O. Spann, Gesellschaftslehre, Gesamtausgabe, Band 4 (Graz, 1969), 127. 4 . Spann, however, held that his universalism is not the antithesis of individualism in the

Journal

Australian Journal of Politics and History – Wiley

Published: Aug 1, 1985

There are no references for this article.