Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

SIMPLE ERROR IN MARRIAGE TRIBUNAL CASES

SIMPLE ERROR IN MARRIAGE TRIBUNAL CASES Footnotes 1 De Synodo diocecesana , Lib. 13, cap. 22, no. 2. 2 Ibid., no. 3. 3 S.R.R. [= Sacrae Romanae Rotae Decisiones ], Vol.34 Decis. 17, p. 167. no.2. 4 De Synodo dioecesana , loc. cit., no. 7. 5 Ibid., pp. 646–9. 6 Ibid., no.7. 1 S.R.R Vol. 34, Decis. 17, p. 167, no. 2. 2 Ibid. 1 In the American Ecclesiastical Review ([1961], pp. 23–31, 96–107) Fr Paul Hilsdale S.J. has examined the question whether non‐Catholic marriages are still valid. In this sociological rather than canonical study, the author has come to the conclusion that non‐Catholics in general still have a prevailing intention to contract marriage either as instituted by Christ, or at least as other men contract it, i.e with merely simple error, if there is any error at all. 2 S.R.R., Vol. 16, Decis. 9, p. 74. 3 S.R.R., Vol. 16, Decis, 7, p. 59; another decision which examines almost all the Fonts of the doctrine on simple error is the third instance trial of the Boni‐Gould case, coram Prior of February 8th, 1915 (S.R.R., Vol. 7, Decis. 3, pp. 20–42). 4 Reported in II Diritto Ecclesiastico (1963), fasc. I‐II, Pt. 2, pp. 18–33. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Heythrop Journal Wiley

SIMPLE ERROR IN MARRIAGE TRIBUNAL CASES

BROWN, REVD RALPH
The Heythrop Journal , Volume 8 (2) – Apr 1, 1967
Download PDF
12 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/simple-error-in-marriage-tribunal-cases-oVEtBlygKF

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 1967 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
ISSN
0018-1196
eISSN
1468-2265
DOI
10.1111/j.1468-2265.1967.tb00736.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Footnotes 1 De Synodo diocecesana , Lib. 13, cap. 22, no. 2. 2 Ibid., no. 3. 3 S.R.R. [= Sacrae Romanae Rotae Decisiones ], Vol.34 Decis. 17, p. 167. no.2. 4 De Synodo dioecesana , loc. cit., no. 7. 5 Ibid., pp. 646–9. 6 Ibid., no.7. 1 S.R.R Vol. 34, Decis. 17, p. 167, no. 2. 2 Ibid. 1 In the American Ecclesiastical Review ([1961], pp. 23–31, 96–107) Fr Paul Hilsdale S.J. has examined the question whether non‐Catholic marriages are still valid. In this sociological rather than canonical study, the author has come to the conclusion that non‐Catholics in general still have a prevailing intention to contract marriage either as instituted by Christ, or at least as other men contract it, i.e with merely simple error, if there is any error at all. 2 S.R.R., Vol. 16, Decis. 9, p. 74. 3 S.R.R., Vol. 16, Decis, 7, p. 59; another decision which examines almost all the Fonts of the doctrine on simple error is the third instance trial of the Boni‐Gould case, coram Prior of February 8th, 1915 (S.R.R., Vol. 7, Decis. 3, pp. 20–42). 4 Reported in II Diritto Ecclesiastico (1963), fasc. I‐II, Pt. 2, pp. 18–33.

Journal

The Heythrop Journal – Wiley

Published: Apr 1, 1967

There are no references for this article.