Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Service Responses to Men with Intellectual Disabilities who have Unacceptable or Abusive Sexual Behaviours: The Case Against Inaction

Service Responses to Men with Intellectual Disabilities who have Unacceptable or Abusive Sexual... This paper documents service responses to a small group of men with intellectual disabilities whose sexual behaviour was considered to be unacceptable or abusive. The data were gathered through a small‐scale action research project using case studies to explore current practice and staff attitudes. Service responses were hindered by unclear definitions of abusive sexual behaviour and inconsistent perceptions of risk and they were characterised by poor coordination, lack of specific care‐planning, failure to agree to appropriate additional supervisory measures and lack of clarity within and between agencies. The purchaser/provider split did not function to enhance accountability or facilitate monitoring of interventions but seemed in some cases to exacerbate misunderstanding and ‘buck‐passing’. Complex ethical and advocacy issues remained unaddressed in these men's lives as did the necessity of protecting vulnerable people who might be potential victims of their behaviour. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities Wiley

Service Responses to Men with Intellectual Disabilities who have Unacceptable or Abusive Sexual Behaviours: The Case Against Inaction

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/service-responses-to-men-with-intellectual-disabilities-who-have-UDpyUWmw7H

References (17)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
1997 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
ISSN
1360-2322
eISSN
1468-3148
DOI
10.1111/j.1468-3148.1997.tb00016.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This paper documents service responses to a small group of men with intellectual disabilities whose sexual behaviour was considered to be unacceptable or abusive. The data were gathered through a small‐scale action research project using case studies to explore current practice and staff attitudes. Service responses were hindered by unclear definitions of abusive sexual behaviour and inconsistent perceptions of risk and they were characterised by poor coordination, lack of specific care‐planning, failure to agree to appropriate additional supervisory measures and lack of clarity within and between agencies. The purchaser/provider split did not function to enhance accountability or facilitate monitoring of interventions but seemed in some cases to exacerbate misunderstanding and ‘buck‐passing’. Complex ethical and advocacy issues remained unaddressed in these men's lives as did the necessity of protecting vulnerable people who might be potential victims of their behaviour.

Journal

Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual DisabilitiesWiley

Published: Jun 1, 1997

There are no references for this article.