Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
C. M. CAMPBELL, E. F. ROBERTSON, N. RUSKUC AND R. M. THOMAS 1. Introduction We consider semigroup presentations of the form n = <fl ...,a \u = v ,...,u = v ) ls n l l m m where m,neN, and u ,v , i = 1,...,m, are non-empty words in the symbols a,...,a. t t x n Every such presentation can also be considered as a group presentation. To distinguish between the semigroup and the group defined by II, we shall denote them by Sgp(II) and Gp(II) respectively. The purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship between Sgp(Il) and Gp(II). Examples of semigroups defined by presentations can be found in [1], [2], [7] and [9]. A common feature of all these semigroups is that each of them contains a certain number of copies of the group with the same presentation as the semigroup. On the other hand, the presentation <a| > shows not only that Gp(IT) is not necessarily contained in Sgp(IT), but that it can even fail to be a homomorphic image of Sgp(II). Although it is fairly easy to show that if either Gp(FI) or Sgp(II) is finite, then Gp(II) is a homomorphic image
Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 1995
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.