Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D Orhon (2015)
Evolution of the activated sludge process: the first 50 years, 90
Jenkins D (1968)
Control of activated sludge by mean cell residence timeJ Water Pollut Control Fed, 40
MC Wentzel, LH Lotter, GA Ekama, RE Loewenthal, GVC Marais (1991)
Evaluation of biochemical models for biological phosphorus removal, 23
IE Ardern, WT Lockett (1914)
Experiments on the oxidation of sewage without the aid of filters, 33
Johnson WK (1964)
Nitrogen removal by nitrification and denitrificationJ Water Pollut Control Fed, 36
Downing AL (1964)
Nitrification in the activated sludge processJ Proc Inst Sewage Purif, 7
Garrett MT (1958)
Hydraulic control of activated sludge growth rateSewage Ind Waste, 30
J Monod (1949)
The growth of bacterial cultures, 3
D Jenkins (2008)
From total suspended solids to molecular biology tools – a personal view of biological wastewater treatment process population dynamics, 80
Alleman JE (1983)
Reflections on seven decades of activated sludge historyJ Water Pollut Control Fed, 55
Young JC (1965)
History of the biochemical oxygen demandWater Sewage Works, 112
INTRODUCTIONDomestic sewage requires biological treatment for the effective removal of organic matter and nutrients to meet stringent effluent limitations. The activated sludge process offers a few of the most appropriate configurations for this purpose. This process has evolved through a series of astonishing achievements ever since its accidental discovery more than a century ago;1 since then, it has been developed to a stage where a mixed microbial suspended culture can be tailored to sustain several groups of heterotrophs and autotrophs, all performing different metabolic tasks, such as organic carbon removal, nitrification, denitrification, and enhanced biological phosphorus removal, among others.2,3 The process is still open to further progress, considering the never‐ending quest for scientific support.4This new discovery in treatment was immediately put into practice by the technical people and activated sludge plants were built without the slightest understanding of the nature and mechanisms of the process. Satisfactory performance was largely due to the ingenuity and common sense of the technical people; their empirical experience soon became inadequate and this triggered efforts to establish a scientific basis for the process in terms of microbial kinetics and mass balance. The need for experimental support during the initial phase was minimal and limited
Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology – Wiley
Published: Aug 1, 2022
Keywords: experimental support; activated sludge; biological nitrogen removal; process stoichiometry; system design
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.