Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Cobbinah (1983)
Suitability of various eucalypts for growth of the larvae of Uraba lugens (Walk)Forest Ecology and Management, 6
(2000)
How timedependent processes can affect the outcome of assays. HostSpecificity Testing of Exotic Arthropod Biological Control Agents: The Biological Basis for Improvement in Safety, FHTET-99-1 (ed
(2001)
Gum leaf skeletoniser eradication
P. Lange, D. Norton, S. Courtney, P. Heenan, J. Barkla, E. Cameron, R. Hitchmough, A. Townsend (2009)
Threatened and uncommon plants of New Zealand (2008 revision)New Zealand Journal of Botany, 47
G. Ridley, J. Bain, L. Bulman, M. Dick, M. Kay (2000)
Threats to New Zealand's indigenous forests from exotic pathogens and pests.
B. Barratt, A. Moeed, L. Malone (2006)
Biosafety assessment protocols for new organisms in New Zealand: Can they apply internationally to emerging technologies?Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26
Tasmania trip for Uraba lugens biological control researcher. Forest Health News
C. Stone (1993)
Insect pest problems of eucalypt plantations in Australia. 2. New South Wales.Australian Forestry, 56
F. Morgan, J. Cobbinah (1977)
Oviposition and establishment of Uraba lugens (Walker), the gum leaf skeletoniserAustralian Forestry, 40
D. Suckling, A. Gibb, P. Dentener, D. Seldon, Gk Clare, L. Jamieson, D. Baird, D. Kriticos, Ashraf El-Sayed (2005)
Uraba lugens (Lepidoptera: Nolidae) in New Zealand: Pheromone Trapping for Delimitation and Phenology, 98
J. Miller, P. Cannon, C. Ecroyd (1992)
Introduced forest trees in New Zealand: recognition, role, and seed source. 11. Eucalyptus nitens (Deane et Maiden) Maiden.
K. Campbell (1962)
The biology of Roeselia lugens (Walk.) the Gum-leaf skeletonizer moth, with particular reference to the Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehn. (River Red Gum) forests of the Murray Valley Region., 87
(2004)
Parameters used in laboratory host range tests
(2009)
The transoceanic migration of lepidoptera
C. Humphries (1997)
The Ecology and Biogeography of Nothofagus forestsBiodiversity & Conservation, 6
(1977)
Oviposition and establishment of the larvae of the gum leaf skeletoniser, Uraba lugens Walk
(2004)
Parameters used in laboratory host range tests. Assessing Host Ranges for Parasitoids and Predators used for Classical Biological Control: A Guide to Best Practice
Froggatt Froggatt (1900)
Entomological notes on specimens received during 1899.The Agricultural Gazette New South Wales, 11
E. Brockerhoff, Andrew Liebhold, B. Richardson, D. Suckling (2010)
Eradication of invasive forest insects: concepts, methods, costs and benefitsNew Zealand journal of forestry science, 40
R. Govaerts, M. Sobral, P. Ashton, F. Barrie, B. Holst, L. Landrum, Kazue Matsumoto, F. Mazine, E. Lughadha, C. Proneça, L. Soares-Silva, P. Wilson, E. Lucas, C. Proença (2008)
World Checklist of Myrtaceae
R. Crabtree (1997)
The gum leaf skeletoniser, Uraba lugens, at Mt Maunganui, 65
Barratt Barratt, Moeed Moeed, Malone Malone (2006)
Biosafety assessment protocols for new organisms in New Zealand: can they apply internationally to emerging technologies?Biological Control, 26
(1998)
Possible causes of apparently indiscriminate oviposition in host specificity tests using phytophagous insects
R. Close, N. Moar, A. Tomlinson, A. Lowe (1978)
Aerial dispersal of biological material from Australia to New ZealandInternational Journal of Biometeorology, 22
K. Fox (1978)
The Transoceanic Migration of Lepidoptera to New Zealand — A History and a Hypothesis on ColonisationNew Zealand Entomologist, 6
J. Cobbinah (1985)
The Gum Leaf Skeletonizer, Uraba lugens, and Its HostsInternational Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 6
(1974)
The Gum Leaf Skeletonizer Uraba lugens in Victoria
(2009)
Decision Making : A Technical Guide to Identifying , Assessing and Evaluating Risks , Costs and Benefits
(1900)
Entomological notes on specimens
J. Renwick, F. Chew (1994)
Oviposition behavior in lepidopteraAnnual Review of Entomology, 39
R. Taylor (1978)
The relationship between density and distance of dispersing insectsEcological Entomology, 3
J. Derraik (2006)
Erucism in New Zealand: exposure to gum leaf skeletoniser (Uraba lugens) caterpillars in the differential diagnosis of contact dermatitis in the Auckland region.The New Zealand medical journal, 119 1241
(1974)
The Gum Leaf Skeletonizer Uraba lugens in Victoria. Forests Commission Victoria Forestry Technical Papers No. 22
(2003)
Tiakina Aotearoa Protect New Zealand : The Biosecurity Strategy for New Zealand
D. Briese, A. Walker (2008)
Choosing the right plants to test: The host-specificity of Longitarsus sp. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) a potential biological control agent of Heliotropium amplexicauleBiological Control, 44
P. Lange, David Norton, P. Heenan, S. Courtney, B. Molloy, C. Ogle, B. Rance, P. Johnson, R. Hitchmough (1999)
Threatened and uncommon plants of New ZealandNew Zealand Journal of Botany, 42
Cobbinah Cobbinah (1985)
The gum leaf skeletonizer, Uraba lugens and its hosts. Possible selection of strains of insects that are able to feed on resistant trees.Insect Science Application, 6
G. Hosking, J. Clearwater, J. Handiside, M. Kay, J. Ray, N. Simmons (2003)
Tussock moth eradication - a success story from New ZealandInternational Journal of Pest Management, 49
A. Sheppard, R. Klinken, T. Heard (2005)
Scientific advances in the analysis of direct risks of weed biological control agents to nontarget plantsBiological Control, 35
J. Bain, H. Mckenzie, R. Crabtree (1997)
Impact assessment for the gum leaf skeletoniser, Uraba lugens Walker (Lepidoptera: Nolidae) in New Zealand.
(1977)
Oviposition and establishment of the larvae of the gum leaf skeletoniser
(1985)
Possible selection of strains of insects that are able to feed on resistant trees
(1978)
The transoceanic migration of lepidoptera to New Zealand : a history and hypothesis
L. Berndt, G. Allen (2010)
Biology and pest status of Uraba lugens Walker (Lepidoptera: Nolidae) in Australia and New Zealand.Australian Journal of Entomology, 49
J. Cobbinah, F. Morgan, T. Douglas (1982)
FEEDING RESPONSES OF THE GUM LEAF SKELETONISER URABA LUGENS WALKER TO SUGARS, AMINO ACIDS, LIPIDS, STEROLS, SALTS, VITAMINS AND CERTAIN EXTRACTS OF EUCALYPT LEAVESAustralian Journal of Entomology, 21
(2008)
Tasmania trip for Uraba lugens biological control researcher
D. Kriticos, K. Potter, NEIL Alexander, ANDY Gibb, D. Suckling (2007)
Using a pheromone lure survey to establish the native and potential distribution of an invasive Lepidopteran, Uraba lugens.Journal of Applied Ecology, 44
M. Ross (2001)
Gum leaf skeletoniser eradication looks promising, 32
(2010)
The biology and pest status of Uraba lugens Walker (Lepidoptera: Nolidae)
(2000)
How timedependent processes can affect the outcome of assays. Host-Specificity Testing of Exotic Arthropod Biological Control Agents: The Biological Basis for Improvement in Safety
K. Potter, A. Stephens (2005)
Suitability of valued eucalypt species for the larval development of the gum leaf skeletoniser, Uraba lugens.New Zealand Plant Protection, 58
(2004)
Parameters used in laboratory host range tests. Assessing Host Ranges for Parasitoids and Predators used for Classical Biological Control: A Guide to Best Practice, FHTET-2004-03, Chapter 6 (ed
1 The risk posed to New Zealand native flora by the recently‐established pest of Australian origin Uraba lugens Walker (Lepidoptera: Nolidae) (gum leaf skeletonizer) was assessed. Weed biological control host range testing methods were applied to identify those New Zealand plant species potentially at risk. Native plants tested were primarily in the Myrtaceae, the family that contains all the Australian hosts of U. lugens. 2 Experimental methods included no‐choice larval feeding assays and field cage and laboratory oviposition trials. Difficulty in ascertaining reliable oviposition preference data from cage oviposition trials limited the confidence with which the invader's field host range could be predicted. 3 Field surveys of plants attacked by U. lugens in the infested area supported the initial predictions but only some of the at‐risk native Myrtaceae were present in the area. 4 The risk to native New Zealand plants is presented in terms of two mechanisms: development of self‐sustaining populations and temporary spill‐over of solitary larvae. Development of self‐sustaining populations of the pest within native forests is deemed to be highly improbable. 5 Temporary spill‐over impacts are most likely in urban areas within mixed species plantings or boundaries between native/exotic forests and coinciding with the mobile larval life stages. Spill‐over impacts from U. lugens have only been recorded to date on Metrosideros excelsa.
Agricultural and Forest Entomology – Wiley
Published: Feb 1, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.