Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
E. Fama, K. French (2014)
A Five-Factor Asset Pricing ModelS&P Global Market Intelligence Research Paper Series
K. Lam, Lewis Tam (2011)
Liquidity and asset pricing: Evidence from the Hong Kong stock marketFuel and Energy Abstracts
L. Liao, Bibo Liu, Hao Wang (2012)
China's Secondary Privatization: Perspectives from the Split-Share Structure ReformGovernance
E. Fama, K. French (1992)
The Cross‐Section of Expected Stock ReturnsJournal of Finance, 47
Ľ. Pástor, R. F. Stambaugh (2003)
Liquidity risk and expected stock returns, 111
Francisco Barillas, Jay Shanken (2015)
Comparing Asset Pricing ModelsERN: Asset Pricing Models (Topic)
E. Fama, James MacBeth (1973)
Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical TestsJournal of Political Economy, 81
Randi Naes, Johannes Skjeltorp, B. Ødegaard (2010)
Stock Market Liquidity and the Business CycleCapital Markets: Market Microstructure eJournal
E. Fama, K. French (2016)
Choosing FactorsCapital Markets: Asset Pricing & Valuation eJournal
Kewei Hou, T. Moskowitz (2003)
Market Frictions, Price Delay, and the Cross-Section of Expected ReturnsMicroeconomics: General Equilibrium & Disequilibrium Models of Financial Markets eJournal
(2014)
Volatility, the Macroeconomy, and Asset Prices
Yi Huang, Jianjun Miao, Pengfei Wang (2019)
Saving China’s Stock Market?IMF Economic Review, 67
Ananth Madhavan (1992)
Trading Mechanisms in Securities MarketsJournal of Finance, 47
V. Acharya, L. Pedersen (2003)
Asset Pricing with Liquidity RiskERN: Pricing (Topic)
David Lesmond, Joseph Ogden, Charles Trzcinka (1999)
A New Estimate of Transaction CostsReview of Financial Studies, 12
Weimin Liu (2006)
A liquidity-augmented capital asset pricing modelJournal of Financial Economics, 82
Tarun Chordia, A. Subrahmanyam, Richard Roll (1999)
Commonality in LiquidityCapital Markets: Market Microstructure
M. Linnenluecke, Xiaoyan Chen, Xin Ling, Thomas Smith, Yushu Zhu (2017)
Research in finance: A review of influential publications and a research agendaPacific-basin Finance Journal, 43
Jianlei Han, J. He, Zheyao Pan, Jing Shi (2018)
Twenty Years of Accounting and Finance Research on the Chinese Capital MarketAccounting
Rui Ma, H. Anderson, Ben Marshall (2017)
Stock Market Liquidity and Trading Activity: Is China Different?Capital Markets: Asset Pricing & Valuation eJournal
A. Barinov (2014)
Turnover: Liquidity or Uncertainty?Risk Management eJournal
Kuan-Hui Lee (2010)
The World Price of Liquidity RiskInternational Finance
Meifen Qian, Ping‐Wen Sun, Bin Yu (2017)
High turnover with high price delay? Dissecting the puzzling phenomenon for China's A-sharesFinance Research Letters, 22
Y. Amihud (2002)
Illiquidity and stock returns: cross‐section and time‐series effects, 5
Kee Chung, Chairat Chuwonganant (2013)
Uncertainty, Market Structure, and LiquidityCapital Markets: Market Efficiency eJournal
Jiyoun An, K. Ho, Zhaoyong Zhang (2019)
What drives the liquidity premium in the Chinese stock market?The North American Journal of Economics and Finance
Y. Amihud (2012)
Market Liquidity: Illiquidity and Stock Returns Cross-Section and Time-Series Effects*
Lijin Pan, Ya Tang, Jianguo Xu (2014)
Speculative Trading and Stock ReturnsEmerging Markets: Finance eJournal
Yong Li, K. Benson, R. Faff (2016)
Political constraints and trading strategy in times of market stress: Evidence from the chinese national social security fundFinance Research Letters, 19
M. Brennan, Sahn-Wook Huh, A. Subrahmanyam (2011)
An Analysis of the Amihud Illiquidity PremiumERN: Econometric Modeling in Financial Economics (Topic)
We investigate the determinants of stocks’ uncertainty elasticity of liquidity (UEL), whether UEL is priced, and how government officials may use national funds to reduce the UEL risk in China’s A‐shares market. We find that stocks with higher UEL have a smaller market capitalisation, lower stock liquidity, less investor attention, and higher market and liquidity risks. Using data from 2004 to 2018, we show that the highest UEL decile portfolio significantly outperforms the lowest UEL decile portfolio by 0.54 percent per month. Moreover, our results show that UEL provides additional explanatory power for stock returns after we control for a stock’s transaction cost, firm characteristic risks, market risk and liquidity risk. As UEL is an important systematic risk, we hypothesise that government officials will take actions to reduce this risk when the market becomes more volatile. Consistent with our hypothesis, our results show that the ‘national team’ provides liquidity by executing trades opposite to those of other institutional investors during the 2015 stock market crisis in China.
Accounting & Finance – Wiley
Published: Apr 1, 2021
Keywords: ; ; ; ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.