Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(Fraser, J. & Wark, J. (2018). Acta Cryst. A74, 447–456.)
Fraser, J. & Wark, J. (2018). Acta Cryst. A74, 447–456.Fraser, J. & Wark, J. (2018). Acta Cryst. A74, 447–456., Fraser, J. & Wark, J. (2018). Acta Cryst. A74, 447–456.
(1922)
London Edinb
P. Fewster (2014)
A new theory for X-ray diffractionActa Crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and Advances, 70
(Alexander, L. (1948). J. Appl. Phys. 19, 1068–1071.)
Alexander, L. (1948). J. Appl. Phys. 19, 1068–1071.Alexander, L. (1948). J. Appl. Phys. 19, 1068–1071., Alexander, L. (1948). J. Appl. Phys. 19, 1068–1071.
(Smith, D. K. (1999). Defect and Microstructure Analysis by Diffraction IUCr Monographs on Crystallography, Vol. 10, edited by R. L. Snyder, J. Fiala & H. J. Bunge, pp. 334–345. IUCr/Oxford University Press.)
Smith, D. K. (1999). Defect and Microstructure Analysis by Diffraction IUCr Monographs on Crystallography, Vol. 10, edited by R. L. Snyder, J. Fiala & H. J. Bunge, pp. 334–345. IUCr/Oxford University Press.Smith, D. K. (1999). Defect and Microstructure Analysis by Diffraction IUCr Monographs on Crystallography, Vol. 10, edited by R. L. Snyder, J. Fiala & H. J. Bunge, pp. 334–345. IUCr/Oxford University Press., Smith, D. K. (1999). Defect and Microstructure Analysis by Diffraction IUCr Monographs on Crystallography, Vol. 10, edited by R. L. Snyder, J. Fiala & H. J. Bunge, pp. 334–345. IUCr/Oxford University Press.
(Fewster, P. F. (2016). Acta Cryst. A72, 50–54.)
Fewster, P. F. (2016). Acta Cryst. A72, 50–54.Fewster, P. F. (2016). Acta Cryst. A72, 50–54., Fewster, P. F. (2016). Acta Cryst. A72, 50–54.
(Fewster, P. F. (2017). IUCr webinar series, 30th May, IUCr YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2sH-6-qwTj0.)
Fewster, P. F. (2017). IUCr webinar series, 30th May, IUCr YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2sH-6-qwTj0.Fewster, P. F. (2017). IUCr webinar series, 30th May, IUCr YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2sH-6-qwTj0., Fewster, P. F. (2017). IUCr webinar series, 30th May, IUCr YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2sH-6-qwTj0.
P. Fewster (2015)
X-Ray Scattering from Semiconductors and Other Materials
(1999)
Defect and Microstructure Analysis
(2002)
The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Routledge Classics
P. Fewster (2004)
A `beam-selection' high-resolution X-ray diffractometerJournal of Applied Crystallography, 37
(Fewster, P. F. (2018). Acta Cryst. A74, 481–498.)
Fewster, P. F. (2018). Acta Cryst. A74, 481–498.Fewster, P. F. (2018). Acta Cryst. A74, 481–498., Fewster, P. F. (2018). Acta Cryst. A74, 481–498.
R. Snyder, H. Bunge, J. Fiala (2000)
Defect and Microstructure Analysis by Diffraction
(Wojtas, D. H. et al. (2017). IUCrJ, 4, 795–811.)
Wojtas, D. H. et al. (2017). IUCrJ, 4, 795–811.Wojtas, D. H. et al. (2017). IUCrJ, 4, 795–811., Wojtas, D. H. et al. (2017). IUCrJ, 4, 795–811.
V. Holý, P. Fewster (2008)
Crystal truncation rod X‐ray scattering: exact dynamical calculationJournal of Applied Crystallography, 41
(Darwin, C. G. (1922). London Edinb. Dubl. Philos. Mag. J. Sci. 43, 800–829.)
Darwin, C. G. (1922). London Edinb. Dubl. Philos. Mag. J. Sci. 43, 800–829.Darwin, C. G. (1922). London Edinb. Dubl. Philos. Mag. J. Sci. 43, 800–829., Darwin, C. G. (1922). London Edinb. Dubl. Philos. Mag. J. Sci. 43, 800–829.
P. Wolff (1959)
Particle statistics in x-ray diffractometryApplied Scientific Research, Section B, 7
(2012)
The Structure of Scientific Resolutions
(2017)
IUCrJ, 4, 795–811
(2018)
Fewster Response to Fraser & Wark
G. Jason (1988)
The Logic of Scientific Discovery
T. Kuhn, I. Hacking (2012)
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions: 50th Anniversary Edition
David Wojtas, K. Ayyer, M. Liang, E. Mossou, F. Romoli, C. Seuring, K. Beyerlein, R. Bean, A. Morgan, D. Oberthuer, H. Fleckenstein, M. Heymann, C. Gati, O. Yefanov, M. Barthelmess, Eirini Ornithopoulou, L. Galli, P. Xavier, W. Ling, M. Frank, C. Yoon, T. White, S. Bajt, A. Mitraki, S. Boutet, A. Aquila, A. Barty, V. Forsyth, H. Chapman, R. Millane (2017)
Analysis of XFEL serial diffraction data from individual crystalline fibrilsIUCrJ, 4
A. Authier (2001)
Dynamical theory of x-ray diffraction
(Popper, K. (2002). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Routledge Classics. Abingdon, Oxford: Routledge.)
Popper, K. (2002). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Routledge Classics. Abingdon, Oxford: Routledge.Popper, K. (2002). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Routledge Classics. Abingdon, Oxford: Routledge., Popper, K. (2002). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Routledge Classics. Abingdon, Oxford: Routledge.
(Fewster, P. F. (2014). Acta Cryst. A70, 257–282.)
Fewster, P. F. (2014). Acta Cryst. A70, 257–282.Fewster, P. F. (2014). Acta Cryst. A70, 257–282., Fewster, P. F. (2014). Acta Cryst. A70, 257–282.
(Holý, V. & Fewster, P. F. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 18–26.)
Holý, V. & Fewster, P. F. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 18–26.Holý, V. & Fewster, P. F. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 18–26., Holý, V. & Fewster, P. F. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 18–26.
(Wolff, P. M. de (1958). Appl. Sci. Res. 7, 102–112.)
Wolff, P. M. de (1958). Appl. Sci. Res. 7, 102–112.Wolff, P. M. de (1958). Appl. Sci. Res. 7, 102–112., Wolff, P. M. de (1958). Appl. Sci. Res. 7, 102–112.
Jack Fraser, J. Wark (2018)
Comments on A new theory for X-ray diffractionActa Crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and Advances, 74
L. Alexander (2013)
Geometrical Factors Affecting the Contours of XRay Spectrometer Maxima. II. Factors Causing Broadening
(2015)
X-ray Scattering from Semiconductors and Other
(Fewster, P. F. (2004). J. Appl. Cryst. 37, 565–574.)
Fewster, P. F. (2004). J. Appl. Cryst. 37, 565–574.Fewster, P. F. (2004). J. Appl. Cryst. 37, 565–574., Fewster, P. F. (2004). J. Appl. Cryst. 37, 565–574.
(James, R. W. (1962). The Crystalline State, Vol. II, The Optical Principles of the Diffraction of X-rays. London: Bell.)
James, R. W. (1962). The Crystalline State, Vol. II, The Optical Principles of the Diffraction of X-rays. London: Bell.James, R. W. (1962). The Crystalline State, Vol. II, The Optical Principles of the Diffraction of X-rays. London: Bell., James, R. W. (1962). The Crystalline State, Vol. II, The Optical Principles of the Diffraction of X-rays. London: Bell.
(Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The Structure of Scientific Resolutions. University of Chicago Press.)
Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The Structure of Scientific Resolutions. University of Chicago Press.Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The Structure of Scientific Resolutions. University of Chicago Press., Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The Structure of Scientific Resolutions. University of Chicago Press.
P. Fewster (1989)
A high‐resolution multiple‐crystal multiple‐reflection diffractometerJournal of Applied Crystallography, 22
P. Fewster (2018)
Estimating the structure factors in X-ray diffractionActa Crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and Advances, 74
C. Darwin (1922)
XCII. The reflexion of X-rays from imperfect crystalsPhilosophical Magazine Series 1, 43
(2017)
IUCr webinar series, 30th May
(Fewster, P. F. (1989). J. Appl. Cryst. 22, 64–69.)
Fewster, P. F. (1989). J. Appl. Cryst. 22, 64–69.Fewster, P. F. (1989). J. Appl. Cryst. 22, 64–69., Fewster, P. F. (1989). J. Appl. Cryst. 22, 64–69.
P. Debye (1934)
The Crystalline StateNature, 134
(2018)
Fewster Response to Fraser
(Authier, A. (2001). Dynamical Theory of X-ray Diffraction IUCr Monographs on Crystallography, Vol. 11. IUCr/Oxford University Press.)
Authier, A. (2001). Dynamical Theory of X-ray Diffraction IUCr Monographs on Crystallography, Vol. 11. IUCr/Oxford University Press.Authier, A. (2001). Dynamical Theory of X-ray Diffraction IUCr Monographs on Crystallography, Vol. 11. IUCr/Oxford University Press., Authier, A. (2001). Dynamical Theory of X-ray Diffraction IUCr Monographs on Crystallography, Vol. 11. IUCr/Oxford University Press.
(Fewster, P. F. (2015). X-ray Scattering from Semiconductors and Other Materials, 3rd ed. Singapore: World Scientific.)
Fewster, P. F. (2015). X-ray Scattering from Semiconductors and Other Materials, 3rd ed. Singapore: World Scientific.Fewster, P. F. (2015). X-ray Scattering from Semiconductors and Other Materials, 3rd ed. Singapore: World Scientific., Fewster, P. F. (2015). X-ray Scattering from Semiconductors and Other Materials, 3rd ed. Singapore: World Scientific.
P. Fewster (2016)
What is an ‘ideally imperfect’ crystal? Is kinematical theory appropriate?Acta Crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and Advances, 72
The criticisms of my theory, as given by Fraser & Wark [(2018), Acta Cryst. A74, 447–456], are built on a misunderstanding of the concept and the methodology I have used. The assumption they have made rules out my description from which they conclude that my theory is proved to be wrong. They assume that I have misunderstood the diffraction associated with the shape of a crystal and my calculation is only relevant to a parallelepiped and even that I have got wrong. It only appears wrong to Fraser & Wark because the effect I predict has nothing to do with the crystal shape. The effect though can be measured as well as the crystal shape effects. This response describes my reasoning behind the theory, how it can be related to the Ewald sphere construction, and the build‐up of the full diffraction pattern from all the scatterers in a stack of planes. It is the latter point that makes the Fraser & Wark analysis incomplete. The description given in this article describes my approach much more precisely with reference to the Ewald sphere construction. Several experiments are described that directly measure the predictions of the new theory, which are explained with reference to the Ewald sphere description. In its simplest terms the new theory can be considered as giving a thickness to the Ewald sphere surface, whereas in the conventional theory it has no thickness. Any thickness immediately informs us that the scattering from a peak at the Bragg angle does not have to be in the Bragg condition to be observed. I believe the conventional theory is a very good approximation, but as soon as it is tested with careful experiments it is shown to be incomplete. The new theory puts forward the idea that there is persistent intensity at the Bragg scattering angle outside the Bragg condition. This intensity is weak (∼10−5) but can be observed in careful laboratory experiments, despite being on the limit of observation, yet it has a profound impact on how we should interpret diffraction patterns.
Acta Crystallographica Section A: Foundations and Advances – Wiley
Published: Sep 1, 2018
Keywords: ; ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.