Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Burns (2006)
Tools for the MindEducational Leadership, 63
H. Schumny (1987)
Tools of the mindTechniques and methods for intellectual network V. Stibic, North-Holland Publ. Co, Amsterdam (1983), 296 pages, Dfl 95,00Microprocessing and Microprogramming
C. Gerstadt, Y. Hong, A. Diamond (1994)
The relationship between cognition and action: Performance of children Article| PDF (1504 K)| View Record in Scopus| Cited by in Scopus (424) 3 1 2-7 years old on a Stroop-like day-night test
J. Towse, John Redbond, C. Houston-Price, Susan Cook (2000)
Understanding the dimensional change card sort: Perspectives from task success and failureCognitive Development, 15
M. Milham, M. Banich, A. Webb, Vikram Barad, N. Cohen, T. Wszalek, A. Kramer (2001)
The relative involvement of anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex in attentional control depends on nature of conflict.Brain research. Cognitive brain research, 12 3
D. Bjorklund, Charles Dukes, R. Brown (2008)
The development of memory strategies
W. Mischel, Y. Shoda, Monica Rodriguez (1989)
Delay of gratification in children.Science, 244 4907
L. Jones, M. Rothbart, M. Posner (2003)
Development of executive attention in preschool childrenDevelopmental Science, 6
S. Carlson (2005)
Developmentally Sensitive Measures of Executive Function in Preschool ChildrenDevelopmental Neuropsychology, 28
Milham Milham, Banich Banich, Webb Webb, Barad Barad, Cohen Cohen, Wszalek Wszalek, Kramer Kramer (2001)
The relative involvement of anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex in attentional control depends on nature of conflictCognitive Brain Research, 12
E. Lehman, Sally Srokowski, L. Hall, Mary Renkey, Carmen Cruz (2003)
Directed Forgetting of Related Words: Evidence for the Inefficient Inhibition HypothesisThe Journal of General Psychology, 130
Andrew Simpson, Kevin Riggs (2005)
Factors responsible for performance on the day-night task: response set or semantics?Developmental science, 8 4
D. Livesey, G. Morgan (1991)
The development of response inhibition in 4- and 5-year-old childrenAustralian Journal of Psychology, 43
Julie Hanauer, P. Brooks (2005)
Contributions of response set and semantic relatedness to cross-modal Stroop-like picture-word interference in children and adults.Journal of experimental child psychology, 90 1
A. Kersten, Linda Smith (2002)
Attention to novel objects during verb learning.Child development, 73 1
D. Carroll, I. Apperly, Kevin Riggs (2007)
The Executive Demands of Strategic Reasoning are Modified by the Way in which Children are Prompted to Think About the Task: Evidence from 3- to 4-Year-Olds.Cognitive Development, 22
Perner Perner, Lang Lang (2002)
What causes 3?year olds? difficulty on the dimensional change card sort task?Child Development, 73
Rima Hanania, Linda Smith (2009)
Selective attention and attention switching: towards a unified developmental approach.Developmental science, 13 4
Andrew Simpson, Kevin Riggs (2007)
Under what conditions do young children have difficulty inhibiting manual actions?Developmental psychology, 43 2
K. Harnishfeger, R.Steffen Pope (1996)
Intending to forget: the development of cognitive inhibition in directed forgetting.Journal of experimental child psychology, 62 2
M. Kreutzer, Catherine Leonard, J. Flavell (1975)
An interview study of children's knowledge about memoryMonographs of The Society for Research in Child Development, 40
J. Perner, B. Lang (2002)
What causes 3‐year‐olds' difficulty on the dimensional change card sorting task?Infant and Child Development, 11
(2004)
The PATHS curriculum: theory and research on neuro-cognitive development and school success
J. Russell, S. Hala, E. Hill (2003)
The automated windows task: the performance of preschool children, children with autism, and children with moderate learning difficultiesCognitive Development, 18
N. Stirling (1979)
Stroop Interference: An Input and an Output PhenomenonQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31
Kirkham Kirkham, Cruess Cruess, Diamond Diamond (2003)
Helping children apply their knowledge to their behaviour on a dimension?switch taskDevelopmental Science, 6
Darlene DeMarie, P. Miller, J. Ferron, W. Cunningham (2004)
Path Analysis Tests of Theoretical Models of Children's Memory PerformanceJournal of Cognition and Development, 5
Gerstadt Gerstadt, Hong Hong, Diamond Diamond (1994)
The relationship between cognition and action: performance of 3 �? 7 years old on Stroop?like day?night testCognition, 53
Andrew Simpson, Kevin Riggs, Muriel Simon (2004)
What makes the windows task difficult for young children: rule inference or rule use?Journal of experimental child psychology, 87 2
J. Deloache, D. Cassidy, A. Brown (1985)
Precursors of mnemonic strategies in very young children's memory.Child development, 56 1
N. Friedman, A. Miyake (2004)
The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: a latent-variable analysis.Journal of experimental psychology. General, 133 1
Mark Samuels, P. Brooks, D. Frye (1996)
Strategic game playing in children through the windows taskBritish Journal of Development Psychology, 14
P. Brooks, Julie Hanauer, Barbara Padowska, H. Rosman (2003)
The role of selective attention in preschoolers’ rule use in a novel dimensional card sortCognitive Development, 18
Andrew Simpson, Kevin Riggs (2011)
Under what conditions do children have difficulty in inhibiting imitation? Evidence for the importance of planning specific responses.Journal of experimental child psychology, 109 4
N. Kirkham, L. Cruess, A. Diamond (2003)
ARTICLE WITH PEER COMMENTARIES AND RESPONSE Helping children apply their knowledge to their behavior on a dimension-switching task
J. Rivière, R. Lécuyer (2003)
The C-not-B error: a comparative studyCognitive Development, 18
R. Proctor (1978)
Sources of color-word interference in the Stroop color-naming taskPerception & Psychophysics, 23
D. Montgomery, Maren Anderson, E. Uhl (2008)
Interference Control in Preschoolers: Factors Influencing Performance on the Day-Night Task.Infant and Child Development, 17
Thomas Coyle, David Bjorklund (1997)
Age differences in, and consequences of, multiple- and variable-strategy use on a multitrial sort-recall task.Developmental psychology, 33 2
D. DeMarie-Dreblow, P. Miller (1988)
The development of children's strategies for selective attention: evidence for a transitional period.Child development, 59 6
L. Frank (1935)
The Society for Research in Child Development, 9
F. Verbruggen, G. Logan (2008)
Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigmTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 12
B. Hommel (2000)
The prepared reflex: Automaticity and control in stimulus-response translation
W. Heij (1988)
Components of Stroop-like interference in picture naming.Memory & cognition, 16 5
Deborah Leong, E. Bodrova (1995)
Tools of the Mind: The Vygotskian Approach to Early Childhood Education
E. Dalrymple-Alford (1972)
Associative facilitation and interference in the Stroop color-word taskPerception & Psychophysics, 11
M. Courage, N. Cowan (2008)
The development of memory in infancy and childhood
M. Davidson, Dima Amso, Loren Anderson, A. Diamond (2006)
Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: Evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switchingNeuropsychologia, 44
Samuels Samuels, Brooks Brooks, Fyre Fyre (1996)
Strategic game playing in children through the windows taskJournal of Developmental Psychology, 14
F. Verbruggen, B. Liefooghe, A. Vandierendonck (2004)
The interaction between stop signal inhibition and distractor interference in the flanker and Stroop task.Acta psychologica, 116 1
W. Damon (1997)
A Handbook of Child PsychologyNature, 130
J. Nigg (2000)
On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy.Psychological bulletin, 126 2
A. Diamond, N. Kirkham, Dima Amso (2002)
Conditions under which young children can hold two rules in mind and inhibit a prepotent response.Developmental psychology, 38 3
F. Verbruggen, B. Liefooghe, W. Notebaert, A. Vandierendonck (2005)
Effects of stimulus-stimulus compatibility and stimulus-response compatibility on response inhibition.Acta psychologica, 120 3
C. Gerstadt, Yoonah Hong, A. Diamond (1994)
The relationship between cognition and action: performance of children 3 1 2 –7 years old on a stroop- like day-night testCognition, 53
Zelazo Zelazo, Frye Frye (1998)
Cognitive complexity and control: II. The development of executive function in childhoodCurrent Directions in Psychological Science, 7
W. Schneider, Veronika Kron-Sperl, Michael Hünnerkopf (2009)
The development of young children's memory strategies: Evidence from the Würzburg Longitudinal Memory StudyEuropean Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6
Lucy Cragg (2008)
The development of executive function in childhood
P. Miller, J. Woody-Ramsey, P. Aloise (1991)
The Role of Strategy Effortfulness in Strategy Effectiveness.Developmental Psychology, 27
Simpson Simpson, Riggs Riggs (2005)
Factors responsible for performance on the day?night task: response set or semantic relation?Developmental Science, 8
How response prepotency is created and overcome 11
Understanding (a) how responses become prepotent provides insights into when inhibition is needed in everyday life. Understanding (b) how response prepotency is overcome provides insights for helping children develop strategies for overcoming such tendencies. Concerning (a), on tasks such as the day‐night Stroop‐like task, is the difficulty with inhibiting saying the name of the stimulus due to the name being semantically related to the correct response or to its being a valid response on the task (i.e. a member of the response set) though incorrect for this stimulus? Experiment 1 (with 40 4‐year‐olds) suggests that prepotency is caused by membership in the response set and not semantic relation. Concerning (b), Diamond, Kirkham and Amso (2002) found that 4‐year‐olds could succeed on the day‐night task if the experimenter sang a ditty after showing the stimulus card, before the child was to respond. They concluded that it was because delaying children’s responses gave them time to compute the correct answer. However, Experiment 2 (with 90 3‐year‐olds) suggests that such a delay helps because it gives the incorrect, prepotent response time to passively dissipate, not because of active computation during the delay.
Developmental Science – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 2012
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.