Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Randomized Trial Comparing Two Devices: The Palmaz‐Schatz Stent and the Strecker Stent in Bail‐Out Situations

Randomized Trial Comparing Two Devices: The Palmaz‐Schatz Stent and the Strecker Stent in... To assess whether differences in design (geometry, flexibility) and material (electrostatic behavior) may influence the acute and late outcome following intracoronary stent implantation in the treatment of acute or threatened closure after prolonged balloon inflations, 50 patients were randomized to receive either a Palmaz‐Schatz stent (n = 25) or a Strecker stent (n = 25). http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Interventional Cardiology Wiley

Randomized Trial Comparing Two Devices: The Palmaz‐Schatz Stent and the Strecker Stent in Bail‐Out Situations

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/randomized-trial-comparing-two-devices-the-palmaz-schatz-stent-and-the-f4eIgK9gh0

References (23)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
ISSN
0896-4327
eISSN
1540-8183
DOI
10.1111/j.1540-8183.1994.tb00494.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

To assess whether differences in design (geometry, flexibility) and material (electrostatic behavior) may influence the acute and late outcome following intracoronary stent implantation in the treatment of acute or threatened closure after prolonged balloon inflations, 50 patients were randomized to receive either a Palmaz‐Schatz stent (n = 25) or a Strecker stent (n = 25).

Journal

Journal of Interventional CardiologyWiley

Published: Dec 1, 1994

There are no references for this article.