Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Bech, E. Paykel, L. Sireling, J. Yiend (2015)
Rating scales in general practice depression: psychometric analyses of the clinical interview for depression and the Hamilton rating scale.Journal of affective disorders, 171
(2002)
Structured clinical interview for DSM‐IV‐TR axis I disorders, research version, patient
W. Revelle (2016)
Psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research
Gao Ya-l (2006)
The validity and reliability of the six-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.Chinese Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases
S. Østergaard, P. Bech, K. Miskowiak (2016)
Fewer study participants needed to demonstrate superior antidepressant efficacy when using the Hamilton melancholia subscale (HAM-D₆) as outcome measure.Journal of affective disorders, 190
van Ark, L. Andriès (2012)
New Developments in Mokken Scale Analysis in RJournal of Statistical Software, 48
L. Ark, M. Croon, K. Sijtsma (2007)
Mokken Scale Analysis for Dichotomous Items Using Marginal ModelsPsychometrika, 73
E. DeLong, D. DeLong, D. Clarke‐Pearson (1988)
Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach.Biometrics, 44 3
S. Ostergaard, P. Bech, M. Trivedi, S. Wisniewski, A. Rush, M. Fava (2014)
Brief, unidimensional melancholia rating scales are highly sensitive to the effect of citalopram and may have biological validity: implications for the research domain criteria (RDoC).Journal of affective disorders, 163
P. Bech (2009)
Is the antidepressive effect of second-generation antidepressants a myth?Psychological Medicine, 40
(2002)
Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV-TR axis I disorders, research version, patient edition (SCID-i/p)
K. Sijtsma, I. Molenaar (2002)
Introduction to Nonparametric Item Response Theory
R. Ligtvoet, L. Ark, Janneke Marvelde, K. Sijtsma (2010)
Investigating an Invariant Item Ordering for Polytomously Scored ItemsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 70
X. Robin, N. Turck, A. Hainard, N. Tiberti, F. Lisacek, Jean-Charles Sanchez, Markus Müller (2011)
pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curvesBMC Bioinformatics, 12
(2017)
Psychometric evaluation of a 6‐item Chinese version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: Mokken scaling and item analysis
J. Straat (2012)
Using scalability coefficients and conditional association to assess monotone homogeneity
R. Mokken (1971)
A Theory and Procedure of Scale Analysis: With Applications in Political Research
P. Bech (2015)
The responsiveness of the different versions of the Hamilton Depression ScaleWorld Psychiatry, 14
H.‐G. Hwu (1999)
[The diagnostic manual of psychiatry] [in Chinese]
Ching-I Hung, C. Liu, Shuu-Jiun Wang, Yi-chun Yao, Ching-Hui Yang (2012)
The cut-off points of the Depression and Somatic Symptoms Scale and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in detecting non-full remission and a current major depressive episodeInternational Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice, 16
L. Ark, Danie¨l, W. Palm, K. Sijtsma (2011)
A Latent Class Approach to Estimating Test-Score ReliabilityApplied Psychological Measurement, 35
R. Team (2014)
R: A language and environment for statistical computing.MSOR connections, 1
(1999)
The diagnostic manual of psychiatry] [in Chinese]. Taipei, Taiwan: Health World Co., LTD
J. Loevinger (1948)
The technic of homogeneous tests compared with some aspects of scale analysis and factor analysis.Psychological bulletin, 45 6
P. Bech, L. Gram, E. Dein, O. Jacobsen, J. Vitger, T. Bolwig (1975)
QUANTITATIVE RATING OF DEPRESSIVE STATESActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 51
Janet Williams (1988)
A structured interview guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.Archives of general psychiatry, 45 8
W. Revelle (2017)
psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research
E. Corruble, P. Hardy (2005)
Why the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale endures.The American journal of psychiatry, 162 12
INTRODUCTIONThe 17‐item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM‐D17) is one of the most widely used measure of depression (Bech, ; Bech, Paykel, Sireling, & Yiend, ; Østergaard, Bech, & Miskowiak, ). As the HAM‐D17 is a multidimensional scale, the sum scores of the HAM‐D17 are problematic for measuring depression (Bech, ; Bech et al., ; Østergaard et al., ). Recent studies have shown that the 6‐item melancholia subscale (HAM‐D6) of the HAM‐D17 has superior psychometric properties compared with the HAM‐D17 (Bech, ; Østergaard et al., , ). The HAM‐D6 consists of depressed mood, decreased work and interests, general somatic symptoms, psychic anxiety, guilt feelings, and psychomotor retardation (Bech et al., ). The HAM‐D6 is a unidimensional scale and may be an efficient outcome measure of antidepressant trials (Bech, ; Bech et al., ; Østergaard et al., ).It is unclear whether the HAM‐D6 has adequate psychometric properties in the Chinese populations (Li, Xu, & Gao, ). Li et al () reported that the Chinese HAM‐D6 had poor internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.47). Hence, the present study aimed to address 2 research questions:Is the Chinese HAM‐D6 a reliable and unidimensional scale?Is the Chinese HAM‐D6 as valid as the Chinese HAM‐D17?METHODSWe reanalysed the HAM‐D17
Asia-Pacific Psychiatry – Wiley
Published: Sep 1, 2017
Keywords: ; ; ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.