Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Predictors of adherence, contamination and dropout in home‐based walking by lung and oesophageal cancer patients from two randomised control trials: An exploratory study

Predictors of adherence, contamination and dropout in home‐based walking by lung and oesophageal... INTRODUCTIONExercise is recommended for patients with cancer by several leading health organisations (Campbell et al., 2019; Patel et al., 2019). However, certain types of cancer have symptoms that functionally limit exercise during and after cancer treatments. For example, patients with lung or oesophageal cancer may have shortness of breath or fatigue, affecting their exercise endurance (Avancini, Sartori, et al., 2020; Gannon et al., 2017). In addition, factors such as adherence, contamination and dropout can influence the outcomes of exercise intervention studies and may even distort research findings. A meta‐analysis of 34 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) indicated that most studies in this area lack information about exercise adherence and contamination bias (Buffart et al., 2017). Therefore, understanding adherence, contamination and dropout rates, and the factors that influence them, is important when conducting exercise intervention research.During the COVID‐19 pandemic, visiting periods, numbers of visitors and social‐distancing protocols in hospitals were highly regulated, as per World Health Organisation (WHO) guidelines (World Health Organization, 2020). In line with such policies, cancer patients accepted and preferred home‐based exercise intervention programmes during the COVID‐19 outbreak.Few studies in the field of exercise interventions have analysed the factors that influence exercise adherence, contamination bias and dropout rates among patients with lung or oesophageal http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Journal of Cancer Care Wiley

Predictors of adherence, contamination and dropout in home‐based walking by lung and oesophageal cancer patients from two randomised control trials: An exploratory study

Download PDF
12 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/predictors-of-adherence-contamination-and-dropout-in-home-based-hIkm6hDK67
Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
ISSN
0961-5423
eISSN
1365-2354
DOI
10.1111/ecc.13635
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

INTRODUCTIONExercise is recommended for patients with cancer by several leading health organisations (Campbell et al., 2019; Patel et al., 2019). However, certain types of cancer have symptoms that functionally limit exercise during and after cancer treatments. For example, patients with lung or oesophageal cancer may have shortness of breath or fatigue, affecting their exercise endurance (Avancini, Sartori, et al., 2020; Gannon et al., 2017). In addition, factors such as adherence, contamination and dropout can influence the outcomes of exercise intervention studies and may even distort research findings. A meta‐analysis of 34 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) indicated that most studies in this area lack information about exercise adherence and contamination bias (Buffart et al., 2017). Therefore, understanding adherence, contamination and dropout rates, and the factors that influence them, is important when conducting exercise intervention research.During the COVID‐19 pandemic, visiting periods, numbers of visitors and social‐distancing protocols in hospitals were highly regulated, as per World Health Organisation (WHO) guidelines (World Health Organization, 2020). In line with such policies, cancer patients accepted and preferred home‐based exercise intervention programmes during the COVID‐19 outbreak.Few studies in the field of exercise interventions have analysed the factors that influence exercise adherence, contamination bias and dropout rates among patients with lung or oesophageal

Journal

European Journal of Cancer Care – Wiley

Published: Sep 1, 2022

Keywords: exercise; lung cancer; oesophageal cancer; patient dropout; physical activity; treatment adherence

References

  • The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ‐C30: A quality‐of‐life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology
    Aaronson, N. K.; Ahmedzai, S.; Bergman, B.; Bullinger, M.; Cull, A.; Duez, N. J.; Filiberti, A.; Flechtner, H.; Fleishman, S. B.; Haes, J. C. J. M.; Kaasa, S.; Klee, M.; Osoba, D.; Razavi, D.; Rofe, P. B.; Schraub, S.; Sneeuw, K.; Sullivan, M.; Takeda, F.
  • Exercise levels and preferences in cancer patients: A cross‐sectional study
    Avancini, A.; Pala, V.; Trestini, I.; Tregnago, D.; Mariani, L.; Sieri, S.; Krogh, V.; Boresta, M.; Milella, M.; Pilotto, S.; Lanza, M.
  • Physical activity and exercise in lung cancer care: Will promises be fulfilled?
    Avancini, A.; Sartori, G.; Gkountakos, A.; Casali, M.; Trestini, I.; Tregnago, D.; Bria, E.; Jones, L. W.; Milella, M.; Lanza, M.; Pilotto, S.
  • Borg's perceived exertion and pain scales
    Borg, G.
  • A method to assess energy expenditure in children and adults
    Bouchard, C.; Tremblay, A.; Leblanc, C.; Lortie, G.; Savard, R.; Thériault, G.
  • Effects and moderators of exercise on quality of life and physical function in patients with cancer: An individual patient data meta‐analysis of 34 RCTs
    Buffart, L. M.; Kalter, J.; Sweegers, M. G.; Courneya, K. S.; Newton, R. U.; Aaronson, N. K.; Jacobsen, P. B.; May, A. M.; Galvão, D. A.; Chinapaw, M. J.; Steindorf, K.; Irwin, M. L.; Stuiver, M. M.; Hayes, S.; Griffith, K. A.; Lucia, A.; Mesters, I.; Weert, E.; Knoop, H.; Brug, J.
  • Exercise guidelines for cancer survivors: Consensus statement from international multidisciplinary roundtable
    Campbell, K. L.; Winters‐Stone, K. M.; Wiskemann, J.; May, A. M.; Schwartz, A. L.; Courneya, K. S.; Zucker, D. S.; Matthews, C. E.; Ligibel, J. A.; Gerber, L. H.; Morris, G. S.; Patel, A. V.; Hue, T. F.; Perna, F. M.; Schmitz, K. H.
  • The effectiveness of a nurse‐led exercise and health education informatics program on exercise capacity and quality of life among cancer survivors after esophagectomy: A randomized controlled trial
    Chang, Y. L.; Tsai, Y. F.; Hsu, C. L.; Chao, Y. K.; Hsu, C. C.; Lin, K. C.
  • Effects of rehabilitation program on quality of life, sleep, rest‐activity rhythms, anxiety, and depression of patients with esophageal cancer: A pilot randomized controlled trial
    Chen, H. M.; Lin, Y. Y.; Wu, Y. C.; Huang, C. S.; Hsu, P. K.; Chien, L. I.; Lin, Y. J.; Huang, H. L.
  • Randomised controlled trial on the effectiveness of home‐based walking exercise on anxiety, depression and cancer‐related symptoms in patients with lung cancer
    Chen, H. M.; Tsai, C. M.; Wu, Y. C.; Lin, K. C.; Lin, C. C.
  • Effect of walking on circadian rhythms and sleep quality of patients with lung cancer: A randomized controlled trial
    Chen, H. M.; Tsai, C. M.; Wu, Y. C.; Lin, K. C.; Lin, C. C.
  • Relationships of circadian rhythms and physical activity with objective sleep parameters in lung cancer patients
    Chen, H. M.; Wu, Y. C.; Tsai, C. M.; Tzeng, J. I.; Lin, C. C.
  • Assessing symptom distress in cancer patients: The M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory
    Cleeland, C. S.; Mendoza, T. R.; Wang, X. S.; Chou, C.; Harle, M. T.; Morrissey, M.; Engstrom, M. C.
  • Correlates of adherence and contamination in a randomized controlled trial of exercise in cancer survivors: An application of the theory of planned behavior and the five factor model of personality
    Courneya, K. S.; Friedenreich, C. M.; Sela, R. A.; Quinney, H. A.; Rhodes, R. E.
  • Physical activity for men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: Benefits from a 16‐week intervention
    Culos‐Reed, S. N.; Robinson, J. W.; Lau, H.; Stephenson, L.; Keats, M.; Norris, S.; Kline, G.; Faris, P.
  • Contamination by an active control condition in a randomized exercise trial
    Ehlers, D. K.; Fanning, J.; Awick, E. A.; Kramer, A. F.; Mcauley, E.
  • Reduced fitness and physical functioning are long‐term sequelae after curative treatment for esophageal cancer: A matched control study
    Gannon, J. A.; Guinan, E. M.; Doyle, S. L.; Beddy, P.; Reynolds, J. V.; Hussey, J.
  • Characteristics and patient‐reported outcomes associated with dropout in severely affected oncological patients: An exploratory study
    Gebert, P.; Schindel, D.; Frick, J.; Schenk, L.; Grittner, U.
  • Adherence to a maintenance exercise program 1 year after pulmonary rehabilitation: What are the predictors of dropout?
    Heerema‐Poelman, A.; Stuive, I.; Wempe, J. B.
  • Attrition rates, reasons, and predictive factors in supportive care and palliative oncology clinical trials
    Hui, D.; Glitza, I.; Chisholm, G.; Yennu, S.; Bruera, E.
  • Determinants of exercise adherence and maintenance among cancer survivors: A systematic review
    Kampshoff, C. S.; Jansen, F.; Mechelen, W.; May, A. M.; Brug, J.; Chinapaw, M. J. M.; Buffart, L. M.
  • The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer
    Karnofsky, D. A.; Burchenal, J. H.
  • Determinants of exercise adherence and contamination in a randomized controlled trial in cancer patients during and after allogeneic HCT
    Kuehl, R.; Schmidt, M. E.; Dreger, P.; Steindorf, K.; Bohus, M.; Wiskemann, J.
  • A study on validity and reliability of self‐report measures of physical activity using TriTrac‐R3D accelerometer as criterion
    Lu, C. M.; Lin, S. L.; Huang, Y. C.; Lee, M. H.; Wang, S. F.
  • The factor structure and factor stability of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in patients with cancer
    Moorey, S.; Greer, S.; Watson, M.; Gorman, C.; Rowden, L.; Tunmore, R.; Robertson, B.; Bliss, J.
  • Measuring and understanding adherence in a home‐based exercise intervention during chemotherapy for early breast cancer
    Nyrop, K. A.; Deal, A. M.; Choi, S. K.; Wagoner, C. W.; Lee, J. T.; Wood, W. A.; Anders, C.; Carey, L. A.; Dees, E. C.; Jolly, T. A.; Reeder‐Hayes, K. E.; Muss, H. B.
  • American College of Sports Medicine roundtable report on physical activity, sedentary behavior, and cancer prevention and control
    Patel, A. V.; Friedenreich, C. M.; Moore, S. C.; Hayes, S. C.; Silver, J. K.; Campbell, K. L.; Winters‐Stone, K.; Gerber, L. H.; George, S. M.; Fulton, J. E.; Denlinger, C.; Morris, G. S.; Hue, T.; Schmitz, K. H.; Matthews, C. E.
  • Home‐based exercise among cancer survivors: Adherence and its predictors
    Pinto, B. M.; Rabin, C.; Dunsiger, S.
  • Who will drop out and who will drop in: Exercise adherence in a randomized clinical trial among patients receiving active cancer treatment
    Shang, J.; Wenzel, J.; Krumm, S.; Griffith, K.; Stewart, K.
  • Control group design, contamination and drop‐out in exercise oncology trials: A systematic review
    Steins Bisschop, C. N.; Courneya, K. S.; Velthuis, M. J.; Monninkhof, E. M.; Jones, L. W.; Friedenreich, C.; Wall, E.; Peeters, P. H. M.; May, A. M.
  • Predictors of dropout in exercise trials in older adults: The generation 100 study
    Viken, H.; Reitlo, L. S.; Zisko, N.; Nauman, J.; Aspvik, N. P.; Ingebrigtsen, J. E.; Wisløff, U.; Stensvold, D.
  • Concurrent validation of the Bouchard diary with an accelerometry‐based monitor
    Wickel, E. E.; Welk, G. J.; Eisenmann, J. C.
  • Maintaining essential health services: Operational guidance for the COVID‐19 context interim guidance
  • The hospital anxiety and depression scale
    Zigmond, A. S.; Snaith, R. P.