Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Fulker, Stacey Cherny (1996)
An improved multipoint sib-pair analysis of quantitative traitsBehavior Genetics, 26
(2000)
The suggested new and simple test based upon the two regression coefficients is very similar to the test proposed by Drigalenko
C. Amos, J. Krushkal, Tracy Thiel, Tracy Thiel, A. Young, D. Zhu, E. Boerwinkle, M. Andrade (1997)
Comparison of model‐free linkage mapping strategies for the study of a complex traitGenetic Epidemiology, 14
C. Amos, M. Andrade (2001)
Genetic linkage methods for quantitative traitsStatistical Methods in Medical Research, 10
D. Goldgar (1990)
Multipoint analysis of human quantitative genetic variation.American journal of human genetics, 47 6
J. Hopper (1993)
Review papers : Variance components for statistical genetics: applications in medical research to characteristics related to human diseases and healthStatistical Methods in Medical Research, 2
R. Duggirala, M. Stern, B. Mitchell, Laurie Reinhart, P. Shipman, O. Uresandi, Wendy Chung, R. Leibel, C. Hales, P. O’Connell, J. Blangero (1996)
Quantitative variation in obesity-related traits and insulin precursors linked to the OB gene region on human chromosome 7.American journal of human genetics, 59 3
L. Kruglyak, E. Lander (1995)
Complete multipoint sib-pair analysis of qualitative and quantitative traits.American journal of human genetics, 57 2
Eugene Drigalenko (1998)
How sib pairs reveal linkage.American journal of human genetics, 63 4
J. Hopper, J. Mathews (1982)
Extensions to multivariate normal models for pedigree analysisAnnals of Human Genetics, 46
(2001)
The usual way to test the significance of β# is to calculate the ratio of the regression mean square to the residual mean square under the full model (e.g
P. Visscher, C. Haley, S. Knott (1996)
MAPPING QTLS FOR BINARY TRAITS IN BACKCROSS AND F2 POPULATIONSGenetics Research, 68
Genet. Res
L. Penrose
THE CORRELATION BETWEEN RELATIVES ON THE SUPPOSITION OF MENDELIAN INHERITANCE
D. Allison, M. Neale, R. Zannolli, R. Zannolli, N. Schork, C. Amos, J. Blangero (1999)
Testing the robustness of the likelihood-ratio test in a variance-component quantitative-trait loci-mapping procedure.American journal of human genetics, 65 2
F. Rijsdijk, J. Hewitt, P. Sham (2001)
Analytic power calculation for QTL linkage analysis of small pedigreesEuropean Journal of Human Genetics, 9
F. Pirchner (2000)
Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits.
P. Baret, S. Knott, P. Visscher (1998)
On the use of linear regression and maximum likelihood for QTL mapping in half-sib designs.Genetical research, 72 2
G. Churchill, R. Doerge (1994)
Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping.Genetics, 138 3
R. Fisher (1943)
The Advanced Theory of StatisticsNature, 152
Daolong Wang, Shili Lin, Rong Cheng, Xin Gao, Fred Wright (2001)
Transformation of sib-pair values for the Haseman-Elston method.American journal of human genetics, 68 5
(2000)
q%}8, i.e. twice the value of the parameter from using the sib-pair difference only (Sham et al
D. Allison, José Fernández, Moonseong Heo, T. Beasley (2000)
Testing the robustness of the new Haseman-Elston quantitative-trait loci-mapping procedure.American journal of human genetics, 67 1
P. Poulsen, K. Kyvik, A. Vaag, H. Beck-Nielsen (1999)
Heritability of Type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus and abnormal glucose tolerance – a population-based twin studyDiabetologia, 42
(1999)
investigating the distribution under the null hypothesis separately from the power calculation
S. Self, K. Liang (1987)
Asymptotic Properties of Maximum Likelihood Estimators and Likelihood Ratio Tests under Nonstandard ConditionsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 82
D. Gessler, S. Xu (1996)
Using the expectation or the distribution of the identity by descent for mapping quantitative trait loci under the random model.American journal of human genetics, 59 6
C. Amos (1994)
Robust variance-components approach for assessing genetic linkage in pedigrees.American journal of human genetics, 54 3
W. Forrest (2001)
Weighting Improves the ‘New Haseman-Elston’ MethodHuman Heredity, 52
F. Wright (1997)
The phenotypic difference discards sib-pair QTL linkage information.American journal of human genetics, 60 3
Pak Sham, S. Cherny, Shaun Purcell, John Hewitt (2000)
Power of linkage versus association analysis of quantitative traits, by use of variance-components models, for sibship data.American journal of human genetics, 66 5
R. Fisher
XV.—The Correlation between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance.Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 52
Stephen Harrap, M. Stebbing, John Hopper, H. Hoang, G. Giles (2000)
Familial patterns of covariation for cardiovascular risk factors in adults: The Victorian Family Heart Study.American journal of epidemiology, 152 8
R. Elston, Sarah Buxbaum, K. Jacobs, J. Olson (2000)
Haseman and Elston revisitedGenetic Epidemiology, 19
PC Sham, Shaun Purcell (2001)
Equivalence between Haseman-Elston and variance-components linkage analyses for sib pairs.American journal of human genetics, 68 6
J. Haseman, R. Elston (1972)
The investigation of linkage between a quantitative trait and a marker locusBehavior Genetics, 2
P. Visscher, Robin Thompson, C. Haley (1996)
Confidence intervals in QTL mapping by bootstrapping.Genetics, 143 2
L. Almasy, J. Blangero (1998)
Multipoint quantitative-trait linkage analysis in general pedigrees.American journal of human genetics, 62 5
W. Press (1992)
Numerical recipes in Fortran 77 : the art of scientificcomputing.
Xin Xu, S. Weiss, Xiping Xu, Lee-Jen Wei (2000)
A unified Haseman-Elston method for testing linkage with quantitative traits.American journal of human genetics, 67 4
A common study design to map quantitative trait loci (QTL) is to compare the phenotypes and marker genotypes of two or more siblings in a sample of unrelated sib groups, and to test for linkage between chromosome location and quantitative trait values. The simplest case is sib pairs only, in particular dizygotic twin pairs, and a simple and elegant regression method was proposed by Haseman & Elston in 1972 to test for linkage. Since then, several other methods have been proposed to test for linkage. In this study, we derived the statistical power of linear regression and maximum likelihood methods to map QTL from sib pair data analytically, and determined which methods are superior under which set of population parameters. In particular, we considered four regression‐based and three maximum likelihood‐based approaches, and derived asymptotic approximations of the mean test statistic and statistical power for each method. It was found, both analytically and by computer simulation, that the revisited or new Haseman–Elston method (based upon the mean‐corrected crossproduct of the observations on sib‐pairs) is less powerful than a full maximum likelihood approach and is also inferior to the Haseman–Elston method under a realistic range of values for the population parameters. We found that a simple regression method, based upon both the squared difference and the mean‐corrected squared sum of the observations on sib‐pairs, is as powerful as a full maximum likelihood approach. Our derivations of statistical power for regression and maximum likelihood methods provide a simple way to compare alternative methods and obviate the need to perform elaborate computer simulations. DZ twin pairs are likely to be more powerful for linkage analysis than ordinary siblings because they may share more common environmental effects, thereby increasing the proportion of within‐family variance that is explained by a QTL.
Annals of Human Genetics – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 2001
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.