Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
Pp. x, 384 , Oxford University Press , 2006 , £55.00 . The work of Plato's which has, by a long margin, the most written about it year after year is, not surprisingly, Republic . Under these circumstances, it is not easy to take a fresh look at the dialogue, but that is exactly what Schofield has succeeded in doing. Not that his book is exclusively about Republic – there are also useful sections on, especially, Laws and Statesman – but it is predominantly a series of reflections on Republic . Rather than reading the dialogue from start to finish, Schofield adopts a thematic approach, focusing on those areas of the dialogue which best suit a book in a series devoted to the founders of modern political and social thought. In fact, Schofield's familiarity with modern political thinking is one of the great strengths of the book, and one of the hooks that enable him to find fresh aspects of this most‐studied dialogue. One brief example of this: it has been common to find one of the sources of Plato's anti‐liberalism and anti‐pluralism in his demand that Republic 's Kallipolis be a unity, but comparison with Rawls somewhat
The Heythrop Journal – Wiley
Published: Nov 1, 2007
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.