Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Robert Mitchell, R. Carson (1989)
Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method
J. Sinden (1974)
A Utility Approach to the Valuation of Recreational and Aesthetic ExperiencesAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 56
C. Spash, N. Hanley (1995)
Preferences, information and biodiversity preservationEcological Economics, 12
Baruch Fischhoff, L. Furby (1988)
Measuring values: A conceptual framework for interpreting transactions with special reference to contingent valuation of visibilityJournal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1
N. Georgescu-Roegen (1954)
Choice, Expectations and MeasurabilityQuarterly Journal of Economics, 68
(1991)
Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: how much can they differ?
R. Gregory, S. Lichtenstein, P. Slovic (1993)
Valuing environmental resources: A constructive approachJournal of Risk and Uncertainty, 7
Amitai Etzioni (1986)
The Case for a Multiple-Utility ConceptionEconomics and Philosophy, 2
J. Ford, N. Schmitt, Suzanne Schechtman, Brian Hults, Mary Doherty (1989)
Process tracing methods: Contributions, problems, and neglected research questionsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43
J. Hershey, H. Kunreuther, P. Schoemaker (1982)
Sources of Bias in Assessment Procedures for Utility Functions
T. Stevens, J. Echeverría, R. Glass, T. Hager, T. More (1991)
MEASURING THE EXISTENCE VALUE OF WILDLIFE - WHAT DO CVM ESTIMATES REALLY SHOWLand Economics, 67
J. Encarnacion (1990)
Consumer Choice of QualitiesEconomica, 57
J. Hershey, H. Kunreuther, P. Schoemaker (1982)
Decision Making: SOURCES OF BIAS IN ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES FOR UTILITY FUNCTIONS
I977), 'Trade-off analysis: the indifference and preferred proportions approaches
José Encarnación (1964)
A Note on Lexicographical PreferencesEconometrica, 32
D. Zakay, Y. Tsal (1993)
The impact of using forced decision‐making strategies on post‐decisional confidenceJournal of Behavioral Decision Making, 6
(1992)
An Experimental Examination of Intrinsic Values as a Source of the WTA-WTP Disparity
J. Kidd (1977)
Decisions with Multiple Objectives—Preferences and Value TradeoffsJournal of the Operational Research Society, 28
P. Findlater, J. Sinden (1982)
Estimation of Recreation Benefits from Measured Utility FunctionsAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64
(1993)
Nonuse values in natural resource damage assessment
G. Peterson, T. Brown, Daniel Mccollum, P. Bell, A. Birjulin, A. Clarke, W. Adamowicz, P. Boxall, M. Luckert, W. Phillips, W. White (1996)
Moral responsibility effects in valuation of WTA for public and private goods by the method of paired comparison.
K. MacCrimmon, M. Toda (1969)
The Experimental Determination of Indifference CurvesThe Review of Economic Studies, 36
J. Lazo, W. Schulze, G. McClelland, J. Doyle (1992)
Can contingent valuation measure nonuse valuesAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 74
J. Sinden, J. Wyckoff (1976)
Indifference mapping: An empirical methodology for economic evaluation of the environmentRegional Science and Urban Economics, 6
P. Fishburn (1974)
LEXICOGRAPHIC ORDERS, UTILITIES AND DECISION RULES: A SURVEY, 20
S. Edwards (1986)
ETHICAL PREFERENCES AND THE ASSESSMENT OF EXISTENCE VALUES: DOES THE NEOCLASSICAL MODEL FIT?Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 15
Juan Moldau (1993)
A Model of Choice Where Choice Is Determined by an Ordered Set of Irreducible CriteriaJournal of Economic Theory, 60
J. Irwin, P. Slovic, S. Lichtenstein, G. McClelland (1993)
Preference reversals and the measurement of environmental valuesJournal of Risk and Uncertainty, 6
Non‐compensatory preferences may form a significant component of individuals' values for non‐market goods such as natural areas, especially in the context of a reduction in environmental quality. The widespread neglect of such preferences can result in erroneous estimates of changes in economic welfare. Non‐market valuation using techniques such as contingent valuation therefore need to take into account the possibility that some individuals hold noncompensatory preferences. The formal structure of the lexicographic noncompensatory ordering is described, and the theoretical implications of an individual holding such preferences over some region of goods space is examined. A method for the empirical identification of non‐compensatory preference orderings is outlined.
The Australian Journal of Agricultural Resource Economics – Wiley
Published: Aug 1, 1996
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.