Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
V. S. Briggs (2010)
Call trait variation in Morelett's tree frog, Agalychnis moreletii, of Belize, 66
W. F. Pyburn (1964)
Breeding behavior of the leaf‐frog, Phyllomedusa callidryas, in southern Veracruz, 1964
L. E. Jacobs, A. Vega, S. Dudgeon, K. Kaiser, J. M. Robertson (2017)
Local not vocal: Assortative female choice in divergent populations of red‐eyed treefrogs, Agalychnis callidryas (Hylidae: Phyllomedusinae), 120
M. S. Davis (1987)
Acoustically mediated neighbor recognition in the north American bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana, 21
C. R. Hutter, S. Esobar‐Lasso, J. A. Rojas‐Morales, P. D. A. Gutiérrez‐Cárdenas, H. Imba, J. M. Guayasamin (2013)
The territoriality, vocalizations and aggressive interactions of the red‐spotted glassfrog, Nymphargus grandisonae, Cochran and Goin, 1970 (Anura: Centrolenidae), 47
M.‐F. Chuang, Y.‐C. Kam, M. A. Bee (2017)
Territorial olive frogs display lower aggression towards neighbours than strangers based on individual vocal signatures, 123
C. A. D'Orgeix, B. J. Turner (1995)
Multiple paternity in the red‐eyed treefrog Agalychnis callidryas (cope), 4
R. L. Goldingay, D. A. Newell, D. McHugh, L. Bolitho (2021)
Population stability in an unmanaged population of the green and golden bell frog in northern New South Wales, Australia, 68
W. F. Pyburn (1970)
Breeding behavior of the leaf‐frogs Phyllomedusa callidryas and Phyllomedusa dacnicolor in Mexico, 1970
C. A. Marler, M. J. Ryan (1996)
Energetic constraints and steroid hormone correlates of male calling behaviour in the túngara frog, 240
C. G. Murphy (1994a)
Chorus tenure of male barking treefrogs, Hyla gratiosa, 48
M. Andersson (1994)
Sexual selection
C. R. Bevier (1997)
Breeding activity and chorus tenure of two neotropical Hylid frogs, 53
S. K. Jacobson (1985)
Reproductive behavior and male mating success in two species of glass frogs (Centrolenidae), 41
Y.‐C. Cheng, Y.‐H. Chen, C. Chang, M.‐F. Chuang, Y. Hsu (2022)
Endurance rivalry and female choice jointly influence male mating success in the emerald treefrog (Zhangixalus prasinatus), a lek‐chorusing anuran, 7
M. F. Given (1987)
Vocalizations and acoustic interactions of the carpenter frog, Rana virgatipes, 43
D. Lesbarrères, T. Lodé (2002)
Variations in male calls and responses to an unfamiliar advertisement call in a territorial breeding anuran, Rana dalmatina: Evidence for a “dear enemy” effect, 14
P. C. Owen, S. A. Perrill (1998)
Habituation in the green frog, Rana clamitans, 44
V. S. Briggs (2008)
Mating patterns of red‐eyed treefrogs, Agalychnis callidryas and A. moreletii, 114
H. C. Gerhardt, F. Huber (2002)
Acoustic communication in insects and anurans: Common problems and diverse solutions
M. F. Given (1988)
Territoriality and aggressive interactions of male carpenter frogs, Rana virgatipes, 1988
T. Catry, J. A. Alves, J. A. Gill, T. G. Gunnarsson, J. P. Granadeiro (2012)
Sex promotes spatial and dietary segregation in a migratory shorebird during the non‐breeding season, 7
R. A. Hinde (1956)
The biological significance of the territories of birds, 98
M. S. Caldwell, G. R. Johnston, J. G. McDaniel, K. M. Warkentin (2010)
Vibrational signaling in the agonistic interactions of red‐eyed treefrogs, 20
J. Delia, L. Bravo‐Valencia, K. M. Warkentin (2017)
Patterns of parental care in neotropical glassfrogs: Fieldwork alters hypotheses of sex‐role evolution, 30
C. A. Marler, G. Walsberg, M. L. White, M. Moore, C. A. Marler (1995)
Increased energy expenditure due to increased territorial defense in male lizards after phenotypic manipulation, 37
G. M. Fellers (1979)
Aggression, territoriality, and mating behaviour in north American treefrogs, 27
K. Goldfeld, J. Wujciak‐Jens (2020)
Simstudy: Illuminating research methods through data generation, 5
C. R. Bevier, C. T. Daniel, E. H. Lauren, E. R. Heather (2006)
Chorus attendance and site Fidelity in the mink frog, Rana septentrionalis: Are males territorial?, 40
C. G. Murphy (1994b)
Determinants of chorus tenure in barking treefrogs (Hyla gratiosa), 34
G. Pyke (2005)
The use of PIT tags in capture‐recapture studies of frogs: A field evaluation, 36
D. Bates, M. Mächler, B. Bolker, S. Walker (2015)
Fitting linear mixed‐effects models using lme4, 67
G. Godwin, S. M. Roble (1983)
Mating success in male treefrogs, Hyla chrysoscelis (Anura: Hylidae), 39
P. T. Lopez, P. M. Narins (1991)
Mate choice in the neotropical frog, Eleutherodactylus coqui, 41
W. E. Duellman (1970)
The hylid frogs of middle America
G. A. Parker (1974)
Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behavior, 47
B. J. Greer, K. D. Wells (1980)
Territorial and reproductive behavior of the tropical American frog Centrolenella fleischmanni, 36
S. J. Beaupre, E. R. Jacobson, H. B. Lillywhite, K. Zamudio (2004)
Guidelines for use of live amphibians and reptiles in field and laboratory research
M. Christy (1996)
The efficacy of using passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags without anaesthetic in free‐living frogs, 30
M. L. Crump (1986)
Homing and site fidelity in a neotropical frog, Atelopus varius (Bufonidae), 1986
M. L. Dyson, N. I. Passmore, J. B. Philip, S. P. Henzi (1992)
Male behavior and correlates of mating success in a natural population of African painted reed frogs (Hyperolius marmoratus), 48
M. C. Basto‐Riascos, J. López‐Caro, F. Vargas‐Salinas (2017)
Reproductive ecology of the glass frog Espadarana prosoblepon (Anura: Centrolenidae) in an urban forest of the Central Andes of Colombia, 51
C. R. Maher, D. F. Lott (2000)
A review of ecological determinants of territoriality within vertebrate species, 143
M. F. Given (2002)
Interrelationships among calling effort, growth rate, and chorus tenure in Bufo fowleri, 2002
H. C. Gerhardt, R. E. Daniel, S. A. Perrill, S. Schramm (1987)
Mating behaviour and male mating success in the green treefrog, 35
C. Morrison, J.‐M. Hero, W. P. Smith (2001)
Mate selection in Litoria chloris and Litoria xanthomera: Females prefer smaller males, 26
T. W. P. Friedl, G. M. Klump (2005)
Sexual selection in the lek‐breeding European treefrog: Body size, chorus attendance, random mating and good genes, 70
W. F. Pyburn (1963)
Observations on the life history of the treefrog, Phyllomedusa callidryas (cope), 15
M. Akopyan, Z. Gompert, K. Klonoski, A. Vega, K. Kaiser, R. Mackelprang, E. B. Rosenblum, J. M. Robertson (2020)
Genetic and phenotypic evidence of a contact zone between divergent colour morphs of the iconic red‐eyed treefrog, 29
A. Arak (1983)
Sexual selection by male–male competition in natterjack toad choruses, 306
(2020)
Guidelines for the treatment of animals in behavioural research and teaching, 159
A. G. Kluge (1981)
The life history, social organization, and parental behavior of Hyla rosenbergi Boulenger, a nest‐building gladiator frog
M. Akopyan, K. Kaiser, A. Vega, N. G. Savant, C. Y. Owen, S. R. Dudgeon, J. M. Robertson (2017)
Melodic males and flashy females: Geographic variation in male and female reproductive behavior in red‐eyed treefrogs (Agalychnis callidryas), 124
R. D. Howard (1978)
The evolution of mating strategies in bullfrogs, Rana catesbeiana, 32
T. Getty (1989)
Are dear enemies in a war of attrition?, 37
A. M. Ospina‐L, J. A. Rios‐Soto, F. Vargas‐Salinas (2017)
Size, endurance, or parental care performance? Male–male competition, female choice, and non‐random mating pattern in the Glassfrog Centrolene savagei, 105
For many frog species that aggregate around ponds or streams, chorus attendance, the percentage of time or nights a given male is present and actively calling at an aggregation, is the strongest documented predictor of inter‐male variation in reproductive success in the wild. Males are, thus, thought to compete via endurance rivalry, where available energetic reserves and individual physiology interact to determine chorus tenure. Frogs often exhibit territorial behavior within these aggregations, and territorial status is likely to influence a male's rate of energy expenditure. While males of several anuran species have been shown to hold territories across nights, it is not well understood whether such calling site fidelity is correlated with chorus attendance or mating success. Using subdermal RFID (PIT) tags to minimize disturbance to chorus structure, we quantified site fidelity, chorus attendance, and mating success for all male red‐eyed treefrogs (Agalychnis callidryas) within a breeding aggregation in Panama across 50 consecutive nights. We found that nearly half of these males held territories across nights, that this cross‐night territorial behavior was highly correlated with chorus attendance, and that chorus attendance was, in turn, the strongest predictor of male mating success. Males were most faithful to calling sites containing vegetation contiguous with adjacent sites and were more likely to remain at a site if they were successful in acquiring a mate there on the previous night. To our knowledge, this is the first study linking male site fidelity to chorus attendance and mating success in anurans. While female mate choice is an established driver of lineage diversification and the evolution of sexual signals, agonistic interactions between males at breeding aggregations are well‐documented from a wide range of anuran taxa. The relationship between male–male interactions and mating success deserves broader research attention among anuran species.
Ethology – Wiley
Published: Aug 1, 2022
Keywords: Agalychnis callidryas; anuran; chorus tenure; PIT tag; sexual selection; site fidelity
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.