Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
L. Kissel, Ben-Lian Zhou, S. Roy, S. Gupta, R. Pratt (1995)
The validity of form-factor, modified-form-factor and anomalous-scattering-factor approximations in elastic scattering calculationsActa Crystallographica Section A, 51
D. Schaupp, M. Schumacher, F. Smend, P. Rullhusen, J. Hubbell (1983)
Small‐Angle Rayleigh Scattering of Photons at High Energies: Tabulations of Relativistic HFS Modified Atomic Form FactorsJournal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, 12
G. Turturicǎ, V. Iancu, G. Suliman, C. Ur (2018)
Implementation of photon elastic scattering in GEANT4Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms
W. Muhammad, Sang Lee (2013)
New Empirical Equation for the Atomic Form Factor Function in the Momentum Transfer Range, q = 0–50 Å−1 for the Elements in the Range 1≤ Z ≤30PLoS ONE, 8
X. Jia, Hao Yan, X. Gu, Steve Jiang (2011)
Fast Monte Carlo simulation for patient-specific CT/CBCT imaging dose calculationPhysics in Medicine and Biology, 57
D. Cullen (2017)
A Survey of Electron Cross Section Data for use in EPICS2017
W. Muhammad, Sang Lee (2012)
Source of statistical noises in the Monte Carlo sampling techniques for coherently scattered photonsJournal of Radiation Research, 54
Michele Cianci, J. Helliwell, Madeleine Helliwell, V. Kaučič, N. Logar, Gregor Mali, N. Tušar (2005)
Anomalous scattering in structural chemistry and biologyCrystallography Reviews, 11
J. Hubbell, S. Seltzer (2005)
XCOM : Photon Cross Sections Database
D. Cromer (1983)
Calculation of anomalous scattering factors at arbitrary wavelengthsJournal of Applied Crystallography, 16
R. Murray (1977)
Particle-transport simulation with the Monte Carlo method By and . Technical Information Center, ERDA, 1975, (TID-26607) 115 pp. $dollar;5.45
A. Tartari, A. Taibi, C. Bonifazz, C. Baraldi (2002)
Updating of form factor tabulations for coherent scattering of photons in tissues.Physics in medicine and biology, 47 1
(2019)
PENELOPE 2018: A code system for Monte Carlo simulation of electron and photon transportPENELOPE: A code system for Monte Carlo simulation of electron and photon transport
D. Cullen, J. Hubbell, L. Kissel (1997)
EPDL97: the evaluated photo data library `97 version
M. Berger, J. Hubbell, S. Seltzer, J. Coursey, D. Zucker (1999)
XCOM: Photon Cross Section Database (version 1.2)
D. Cromer, D. Liberman (1970)
Relativistic Calculation of Anomalous Scattering Factors for X RaysJournal of Chemical Physics, 53
H. Menzel (2011)
The International Commission on Radiation Units and MeasurementsJournal of the ICRU, 11
S. Roy, R. Pratt, L. Kissel (1993)
Rayleigh scattering by energetic photons: Development of theory and current statusRadiation Physics and Chemistry, 41
A. Kling, Fernando Baräo, M. Nakagawa, L. Tavora, P. Vaz (2001)
Advanced Monte Carlo for radiation physics, particle transport simulation and applications : proceedings of the Monte Carlo 2000 Conference, Lisbon, 23-26 October 2000
(1993)
At. Data Nucl. Data Tables
W. Muhammad, Sang-Hoon Lee (2013)
Impact of anomalous effects on the angular distribution of coherently scattered photons using Monte Carlo simulationActa Crystallographica Section A, 69
M. Chadwick, M. Herman, P. Obložinský, M. Dunn, Y. Danon, A. Kahler, D. Smith, B. Pritychenko, G. Arbanas, R. Arcilla, R. Brewer, David Brown, R. Capote, A. Carlson, Y. Cho, H. Derrien, K. Guber, G. Hale, S. Hoblit, S. Holloway, T. Johnson, T. Kawano, B. Kiedrowski, H. Kim, S. Kunieda, N. Larson, L. Leal, J. Lestone, R. Little, E. McCutchan, R. Macfarlane, M. Macinnes, C. Mattoon, R. Mcknight, S. Mughabghab, G. Nobre, G. Palmiotti, A. Palumbo, M. Pigni, V. Pronyaev, R. Sayer, A. Sonzogni, N. Summers, P. Talou, I. Thompson, A. Trkov, R. Vogt, S. Marck, A. Wallner, M. White, D. Wiarda, P. Young (2011)
ENDF/B-VII.1 Nuclear Data for Science and Technology: Cross Sections, Covariances, Fission Product Yields and Decay DataNuclear Data Sheets, 112
M. Batič, G. Hoff, M. Pia, P. Saracco (2012)
Photon Elastic Scattering Simulation: Validation and Improvements to Geant4IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 59
K. Amako, S. Guatelli, V. Ivanchenko, M. Maire, B. Mascialino, K. Murakami, P. Nieminen, L. Pandola, S. Parlati, M. Pia, M. Piergentili, Takashi Sasaki, L. Urban (2005)
Comparison of Geant4 electromagnetic physics models against the NIST reference dataIEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 52
A. Surzhykov, V. Yerokhin, S. Fritzsche, A. Volotka (2018)
Diagnostics of polarization purity of x rays by means of Rayleigh scatteringPhysical Review A
R. Pratt, P. Bergstrom, L. Kissel (1993)
New relativistic S-matrix results for scattering -- beyond the usual anomalous factors/beyond impulse approximation
(1989)
Program SCATMAN: A Code Designed to Calculate Photon Coherent Scattering Anomalous Scattering Factors and Cross Sections
D. Bradley, S. Roy, L. Kissel, R. Pratt (1999)
Anomalous scattering effects in elastic photon-atom scattering from biomedically important elementsRadiation Physics and Chemistry, 56
(1999)
Stopping-Power and Range Tables for Electrons, Protons, and Helium Ions: Physical Reference Data. National Institute of Standards and Technology
B. Henke, E. Gullikson, J. Davis (1993)
X-Ray Interactions: Photoabsorption, Scattering, Transmission, and Reflection at E = 50-30,000 eV, Z = 1-92Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, 54
The acceptance–rejection technique has been widely used in several Monte Carlo simulation packages for Rayleigh scattering of photons. However, the models implemented in these packages might fail to reproduce the corresponding experimental and theoretical results. The discrepancy is attributed to the fact that all current simulations implement an elastic scattering model for the angular distribution of photons without considering anomalous scattering effects. In this study, a novel Rayleigh scattering model using anomalous scattering factors based on the inverse‐sampling technique is presented. Its performance was evaluated against other simulation algorithms in terms of simulation accuracy and computational efficiency. The computational efficiency was tested with a general‐purpose Monte Carlo package named Particle Transport in Media (PTM). The evaluation showed that a Monte Carlo model using both atomic form factors and anomalous scattering factors for the angular distribution of photons (instead of the atomic form factors alone) produced Rayleigh scattering results in closer agreement with experimental data. The comparison and evaluation confirmed that the inverse‐sampling technique using atomic form factors and anomalous scattering factors exhibited improved computational efficiency and performed the best in reproducing experimental measurements and related scattering matrix calculations. Furthermore, using this model to sample coherent scattering can provide scientific insight for complex systems.
Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations of Crystallography – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 2020
Keywords: ; ; ; ; ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.